title: The Second World War as a social trauma: a comparative analysis of Russian and French legislation
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Dorskii, Andrei Yu.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Chernogor, Nikolay N.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-07-04T20:06:20Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-07-04T20:06:20Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Dorskii, Andrei Yu., Nikolay N. Chernogor. 2019. “The Second World War as a social trauma: a comparative analysis of Russian and French legislation”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 2: 311–331.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.208
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15862
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article compares legislation for the memorialization of the Second World War in France and Russia. Based on the theory of social trauma, memorial law performs the function of overcoming trauma. Its specific tasks are verbalization of trauma and the expression of points of view that determine the identity of the society. These tasks do not depend on type of law, which can be soft or strict, positive or negative. Social reasons for adopting of memorial legislation include deepening public interest in history and spreading discussions on topics that are painful for national identity. The history of memorial legislation for the Second World War in both countries began long before the adoption of the Gayssot Law in France and the introduction of Art. 354.1 to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Russian laws of1995 and their evolution to the present are considered. With the help of comparative analysis, the common features of legislation on memory in the two countries are highlighted. A comparison focused on the Resistance and the Soviet Union. On the basis of judicial practice, the interpretation of certain controversial concepts is given. The practice of constitutional control over the memorial legislation on the Second World War is traced. The most important directions for improving legislation and social practices are indicated: minimization of necessary restrictions on freedom of speech, and research into crimes committed by citizens of the victorious countries for the period 1939-1945.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The part of the reported study by of A. Yu. Dorsky was funded by RFBR according to the research project No. 18-011-01233 “The Legal Factor in the Dynamics of Social Injury: Russian Experience”.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 10; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: memorial laws
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Second World War
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Geyssot Law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: days of military glory and memorable dates
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: commemorating victory
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: rehabilitation of Nazism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The Second World War as a social trauma: a comparative analysis of Russian and French legislation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 311-331.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15862/1/311-331.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 702,14 kB