title: Austrian metaphilosophy from Bolzano to the Vienna Circle
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Mironov, Dmitry G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-10-05T12:51:24Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-10-05T12:51:24Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Mironov D. G. Austrian metaphilosophy from Bolzano to the Vienna Circle. Philosophy of the History of Philosophy, 2021, vol. 2, рр. 200–216. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu34.2021.113 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu34.2021.113
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44095
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The purpose of the article is to compare and analyze the metaphilosophical ideas of
  the key Austrian thinkers of the 19th and the first half of the 20th centuries. To achieve
  this goal, several tasks are solved: first, to identify the main metaphilosophical positions
  shared by different Austrian philosophers, second, to reconstruct some details
  of the discussed metaphilosophical approaches, and third, to clarify the context
  within which the change in metaphilosophical views took place. The author uses the
  methods of rational reconstruction and historical-philosophical comparisons. The
  main content of the article is divided into four parts. The first part discusses the metaphilosophy
  of B. Bolzano: describes the requirements that Bolzano imposed on philosophizing,
  and shows how he approached the question of defining the concept of
  philosophy. The second part examines the details of the metaphilosophical position
  of F. Brentano and such of his disciples as A. Meinong and K. Twardowski. The peculiarities
  of Brentano’s views concerning the method of philosophizing are examined,
  and some clarifications are made to avoid incorrect interpretations of this views. The
  author also shows what supplementations to Brentano’s metaphilosophy were made
  by Meinong and Twardowski. The third part analyzes the views on the philosophy of
  such thinkers as E. Mach and L. Boltzmann. The requirements for philosophizing on
  the part of natural scientists of the beginning of the 20th century are discussed. In addition,
  the author considers the metaphilosophical ideas of the early M. Schlick, who
  clarified the nature of the assistance provided to the natural sciences by philosophy
  in his work “General Theory of Knowledge”. The fourth part reproduces the metaphilosophy
  of the early L. Wittgenstein and such representatives of the Vienna circle
  as M. Schlick, R. Carnap and O. Neurath. The peculiarities of the Vienna positivists’
  understanding of the activity-based nature of philosophy are clarified, and the differences
  in the interpretation of the method of philosophizing are shown.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Philosophy of the History of Philosophy;Volume 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: metaphilosophy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Austrian philosophy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: B. Bolzano
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: School of Brentano
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: E. Mach
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: L. Boltzmann
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Vienna Circle
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Austrian metaphilosophy from Bolzano to the Vienna Circle
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 200-216.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/44095/1/200-216.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 699,72 kB