title: Implicit administrative acts. Part one
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Andreev, Denis S.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-06-16T08:36:32Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-06-16T08:36:32Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Andreev, Denis S. 2023. “Implicit administrative acts. Part one”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 2: 318–336. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.203 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.203
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/41592
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Based on the comparative legal method, the article analyzes the use of the construction of
  implicit (fictitious) decisions in Russian and several European legal orders, when the inaction
  of the public administration is equated with the adoption of an administrative act. In the first
  part of article the author provides a brief overview of the evolution of the legal regulation of
  the silence of public administration in France, the Netherlands and Germany, and considers
  the influence of the Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of
  December 12, 2006 on services in the internal market (Services Directive) on the development
  of the institution of implicit decisions in the EU countries. The paper analyses the conceptual
  basis and the main arguments pro et contra of two models of implicit administrative acts — a
  negative decision (based on the principle of “silence is a sign of refusal”) and a positive decision
  (based on the principle of “silence is a sign of consent”). Despite political slogans and formal
  proclamation in legislation, in fact, a mixed model is implemented in European national
  legal systems, combining both principles. The functional meaning of implicit administrative
  acts has undergone a significant evolution. The initial purpose of this construction was to
  provide the possibility of appealing against the inaction of public authorities in those legal
  acts that allowed judicial review only of administrative acts. In the future, the construction of
  implicit administrative acts began to be used as a tool for increasing the efficiency of public
  administration, simplifying and speeding up administrative procedures, and stimulating economic
  activity.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 14; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: administrative silence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: administrative inaction
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: public administration
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: implicit decision
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: fictitious decision
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: administrative act
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: administrative decision
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: silent refusal
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: silent consent
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Implicit administrative acts. Part one
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 03.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/41592/1/03.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 750,93 kB