title: The unity of the divine and the human in Christ: The Chalcedonian definition and Paul Tillich’s Spirit Christology
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Chernyavsky, Alexander L.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-10-29T17:05:53Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-10-29T17:05:53Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Chernyavsky A. L. The unity of the divine and the human in Christ: The Chalcedonian definition and Paul Tillich’s Spirit Christology. Issues of Theology, 2021, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 400–416.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2021.307
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33374
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The Christological disputes of the 6th–7th centuries (the polemics of Leontius of
  Byzantium with the Nestorians and Eutychians, and Maximus the Confessor with
  the monoenergistes/monothelites) showed that the Chalcedonian definition gives
  rise to a number of problems that cannot be solved within the framework of traditional
  theology: the unclear ontological status of human nature without a human
  hypostasis; the inconsistency of the ontological models underlying trinitology
  and Christology; the need to resort to an artificial interpretation of the gospel testimonies
  about Christ. However, the Chalcedonian definition is only one possible
  way to describe the unity of the divine and the human in Christ. The Christology
  of Paul Tillich is considered as an example of an alternative description in which
  the above problems do not arise. Tillich’s idea is to replace the traditional concept
  of the Logos incarnated in man with the concept of the Spirit of God transforming
  man. According to this view, God does not act on human nature without hypostasis,
  but on the hypostasis of man through its unifying center. During the
  earthly life of Christ, this effect occurred only in the hypostasis of Christ as man.
  And after (and thanks to) the death on the cross and the resurrection of Christ, it
  extends to all people.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Issues of Theology;Volume 3; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Christology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Chalcedonian definition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: human nature
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ontological interpretation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: unifying center of hypostasis
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Gospel testimony
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Spirit Christology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The unity of the divine and the human in Christ: The Chalcedonian definition and Paul Tillich’s Spirit Christology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 400-416.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/33374/1/400-416.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 699,68 kB