title: Dialectical analysis of amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law of China in 2018
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Peng, Haiqing
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-08-25T13:38:42Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-08-25T13:38:42Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Peng Haiqing. 2021. “Dialectical analysis of amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law of China in 2018”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 2: 384–400.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.209
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/32960
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law in China in 2018 mainly involves enhancing
  the system for leniency based on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment, increasing
  the procedure of fast-track sentencing, improving the convergence norm between the Criminal
  Procedure Law and the Supervision Law, and adding the procedure for trial in absentia. These
  improvements and additions have positive implications for the implementation of a criminal
  policy of leniency and strictness, for realization of the diversion of complex situations and
  simple situations in the proceedings, for deepening the reform of the state’s supervisory
  system, for realizing the people’s procuratorate’s effective performance of legal supervision,
  and power and for effectively punishing crimes of corruption. However, there are limitations
  in the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2018. In the future, the amendment to
  the Criminal Procedure Law can adopt both the comprehensive amendment of the National
  People’s Congress and the partial amendment of its Standing Committee, so as to promote the
  amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law in a timely and comprehensive manner. In terms
  of the amendment’s content, the judicial reform results and coordination between laws should
  be fully considered. New regulations for the new law should be clear and enforceable. In regard
  to law implementation, there should be sufficient time for implementation preparation after
  the promulgation of the new law.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 12; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: amendment
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Criminal Procedure Law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: justice and effectiveness
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Chinese plea bargaining
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: trial in absentia
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: state’s supervisory system
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Dialectical analysis of amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law of China in 2018
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 384-400.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/32960/1/384-400.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 675,93 kB