title: Labor discipline and the limits of the employer’s economic power
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kurennoy, Aleksander M.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-12-01T14:14:58Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-12-01T14:14:58Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38629
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Workplace discipline is supported by the employer with various means of exercising his economic
  power; in this sense it’s the obvious condition of the effectiveness of both individual
  and collective labor. Providing workplace discipline by means of economic power, the employer
  exercises it within certain limits. Those limits are set by the state authority. They are
  determined mainly by the aims of labour and employment legislation, provided in the norms
  of the General Part of the Russian Labor Code. The aims are establishment of state guarantees
  of labor rights and freedoms of citizens, creation of favorable working conditions, protection
  of the rights and interests of employees and employers. The main task of employment legislation
  is creation of legal conditions for achieving optimal balance of the interests of the parties
  of employment relations. Despite the fact that the employee is actually an economically
  weaker side of labor relations, the public nature of labor law and legislation makes it possible
  to guarantee the observance of all the rights of a citizen who is a subject of hired labor and thus
  in case of a conflict can expect the state protection. The employer, on the other hand, is limited
  in public law means of protecting his interests and therefore has to apply his economic power.
  In this regard, the analysis of the limits of its lawful application is of particular importance.
  The article reflects some issues that urgently require their discussion and solution in relation
  to the problem of labor discipline and the limits of economic power, in particular, the principles
  of disciplinary responsibility, as well as the employer’s right (not the obligation) to impose
  disciplinary action on the employee. The article also analyzes the issues of disciplinary liability
  in case of non-standard forms of employment of hired labor, including in remote work and
  telemediated work, as well as in relation to employees sent to the employer under the personnel
  lease agreements.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Russian Journal of Labour & Law;Volume 11
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: legal regulation in the field of labor
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: wage labor
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: economic power
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: labor discipline
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: disciplinary responsibility
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: distance labor
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Labor discipline and the limits of the employer’s economic power
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 89-100.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/38629/1/89-100.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 654,71 kB