title: Features of the Modernization of the Russian Far East: Imperial and Soviet Models of Industrial Development
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Maklyukov, A. V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-06-30T09:00:24Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-06-30T09:00:24Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Maklyukov A. V. ‘Features of the Modernization of the Russian Far East: Imperial and Soviet Models of Industrial Development’, Modern History of Russia, vol. 12, no. 1, 2022, pp. 92–108.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu24.2022.105
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/37025
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The study analyzes the imperial and Soviet models of industrial development of the Russian Far East
  at the end of the 19th century and first third of the 20th century. The relevance of the study is that understanding the
  historical experience of the exploration and development of the eastern territories, and determining their place
  and role in Russian space, ultimately determines the fate of the Russian presence on the shores of the Pacific
  Ocean. The development of the Far East territories since their discovery by Russians was carried out by a combination
  of private initiative of individuals and state support, and from the second half of the 19th century with
  significant state participation. At the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the 20th centuries, the imperial model
  of industrial development of the region formed, and the Soviet model emerged with the establishment of Soviet
  power and the elimination of NEP. The article concludes that the imperial and Soviet model of the industrial development
  of the Far East was based on a strong state influence on the region, which in general, despite its negative
  aspects, can be viewed positively. Here, higher rates of industrial modernization were ensured than in the west of
  the country, and there was no particular risk of conflict with the old, obsolete elements of the social system. Along
  with this, there was a large influence of centralized management and bureaucratic structures that ignored local
  characteristics, conditions, and interests. Historical experience has shown that significant state participation in
  the development of the Far East did not contribute to the efficient use of financial, material, technical, and labor
  resources and was associated with significant costs and losses.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Modern History of Russia;Volume 12; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: modernization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russia
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: industry
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: technical re-equipment
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Far East
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: economy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Features of the Modernization of the Russian Far East: Imperial and Soviet Models of Industrial Development
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 05_maklyukov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/37025/1/05_maklyukov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 896,37 kB