title: Meaningful analysis of innovation, business and entrepreneurial ecosystem concepts
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Burda, Yegor D.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Volkova, Irina O.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Gavrikova, Elizaveta V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-06-29T10:36:12Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-06-29T10:36:12Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Burda Y. D., Volkova I. O., Gavrikova E. V. 2020. Meaningful analysis of innovation, business and entrepreneurial ecosystem concepts. Russian Management Journal 18 (1): 73–102.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2020.104
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/18388
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Over the last decade, academic literature has seen a boom in the number of publications devoted
  to the notion of ecosystem, which has resulted in the emergence of various research
  streams and the corresponding fragmentation of the research domain. The existing variation
  in meanings and contradictory definitions shows the need for a thorough literature review on
  the three tightly related concepts of innovation ecosystem, business ecosystem and entrepreneurial
  ecosystem. This study is based on a mixed technique, which combines a bibliometric
  analysis and an in-depth investigation of papers devoted to these research streams. Through
  examining their theoretical background, constructing conceptual structures and performing an
  in-depth analysis we were able to define the essence of innovation, business and entrepreneurial
  ecosystems as well as their distinctive features. We then proceeded with a comparative
  analysis of these concepts, which allowed us to outline the existing similarities and to demarcate
  the concepts from an ontological perspective. This study provides definitive clarification
  regarding the existing conceptual mix in the field of ecosystem research, and can be used as
  a foundation for a further investigation of the concept.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 19-31-27001.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Russian Management Journal;Volume 18; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ecosystem
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: innovation ecosystem
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: business ecosystem
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: entrepreneurial ecosystem
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: value creation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: bibliometric analysis
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: coopetition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Meaningful analysis of innovation, business and entrepreneurial ecosystem concepts
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 73-102.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/18388/1/73-102.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 3,77 MB