title: Abusive Supervision: Manifestations, Antecedents, and Consequences
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Balabanova, Evgeniya S.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Borovik, Maria E.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Deminskaya, Veronika E.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2018-10-23T16:30:59Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2018-10-23T16:30:59Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Balabanova E. S., Borovik M. E., Deminskaya V. E. 2018. Abusive supervision: Manifestations, antecedents, and consequences. Russian Management Journal 16 (3): 309–336.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/spbu18.2018.301
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/14997
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The authors examine manifestations, individual and organizational antecedents and consequences
  of abusive supervisor behavior which is defined as regular humiliating, suppressive, rude and
  insulting day-to-day practices towards subordinates. Empirical analysis is based on the online
  survey of 198 employees from private and public organizations. We found, first, that abusive
  supervision in Russian organizations is most often manifested in coercion to do routine and unqualified work tasks; ignoring of subordinates’ ideas and initiatives; public critique in an insulting
  manner; cheating subordinates. Second, our investigation shows that respondents attribute
  such behavior to demonstration of power or to supervisors’ poor communicative skills. Third,
  we revealed that the strongest predictor of abusive supervision was employee’s economic dependence,
  namely, the reward system depending rather on personal leader-employee relationships than
  on objective performance indicators. Forth, abusive supervision considerably decreases employees’
  job satisfaction and work engagement, contributes to burnout and intentions to quit.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Russian Management Journal;Volume 16; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: abusive supervision
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: dark side of leadership
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: destructive leadership
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: power relations in organization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: economic dependence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Abusive Supervision: Manifestations, Antecedents, and Consequences
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 01-Balabanova.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/14997/1/01-Balabanova.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 280,2 kB