title: Gorodische from Novgorod and Gnyozdovo: 40 years of controversy
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Petrukhin, Vladimir Yakovlevich
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-03-18T13:57:40Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-03-18T13:57:40Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Petrukhin V. V. Gorodische from Novgorod and Gnyozdovo: 40 years of controversy. Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana, 2019, vol. 2 (26), pp. 93–100.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu19.2019.206
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17200
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In 1979 the author and Tamara Pushkina published an article dedicated to the prehistory of the
  Russian town, where Gnyozdovo settlement near Smolensk was described as princely pogost, controlling
  veche town of the Kriviches, just as «Ryurikovo» Gorodische (hillfort) controlled Slovenian Novgorod.
  Initially, this historic structure caused the rejection, including Evgeniy Nosov: the chronological gap between the earliest nonfortified trade-craft settlements (9th–10th centuries; transcontinental trade was considered the
  background function) and latest old Russian towns dated with the second half of the 10th century (earliest
  Smolensk housing estates belong to the second half of the 11th century). Positions of the opponents became
  closer, when Valentin Yanin speculated that the Princely settlement was part of the emerging from individual
  settlements (future town blocks) Novgorod. Gorodische was perceived as «old town» — New town /
  Novgorod arose from the joining up of primary settlements (Evgeniy Nosov). Smolensk and Gnyozdovo
  excavations reveal the presence of the earliest strata, in Smolensk significantly associated with autochthonous
  long barrows culture (Nikolay Krenke, et. al.), in Gnyozdovo associated with the River Port Zone (Veronica
  Murasheva, et. al.). The problem of future research is whether long barrows found in Smolensk correspond to
  Kriviches town «in its place» and how can the town relate chronologically to the trading port in Gnyozdovo.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana;Volume 2 (26)
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Novgorod
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Gorodische
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Gnyozdovo
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Smolensk
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: urbanization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Gorodische from Novgorod and Gnyozdovo: 40 years of controversy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 93-100.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17200/1/93-100.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 614,88 kB