title: Cossacks Deputies Gatherings as an Element of Political Autonomy of the Host Don in the Late Imperial Period
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Peretyatko, Artyom Yu.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-05-05T21:11:25Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-05-05T21:11:25Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Peretyatko A. Yu. Cossacks Deputies Gatherings as an Element of Political Autonomy of the Host Don in the Late Imperial Period. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2020, vol. 65, iss. 1, рр. 121–139.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2020.107
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17506
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The second half of the 19th century is usually perceived in the historiography on the Don as the
  time of crisis for traditional Host institutions which maintained the Don Cossacks autonomy.
  Thus the question of relationships between the Host Don and the imperial government has remained
  outside the scope of researchers of the Russian outskirts. However, between 1863 and
  1899 elected deputies in the Don area were convened four times to discuss the most acute
  economic and legal issues. Based on the archival materials from the State Archive of Rostov
  Oblast, the Russian State Historical Archive, the Nation Library of Russia Manuscript department,
  memoirs of contemporaries and modern scholarship, the author reveals that opinions
  of these deputies were usually opposed to the government. Despite that, the imperial authorities
  twice had implemented important measures suggested by the Don deputies; one time
  they managed to sway their original opinion in their favour; and only once the will of the Don
  deputies was rejected. At the same time, the Don deputies had always demanded extension
  of the Don Host independence, thus, virtually, full political autonomy. The Ministry of War
  rejected such demands each time, referring to the absence of precedence “in the spheres of
  local and State Imperial management”. The paper concludes that although the Host Don in did
  not enjoyed full political autonomy in1860–1890, there were some elements of it, and the Don
  Cossacks repeatedly achieved actual adjustments to government course in accordance with
  their preferred direction, even though the scale of such adjustments was limited.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Volume 65; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russian Empire outskirts
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the Host Don
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the Don zemstvo
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Cossacks’ legislation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Cossacks’ self-government
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Cossacks Deputies Gatherings as an Element of Political Autonomy of the Host Don in the Late Imperial Period
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 121-139.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17506/1/121-139.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 694,67 kB