title: The Concept of Aesthetic Experience Based on the Theory of Sacrum by R. Otto
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Egorov, Pavel A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-12-05T15:25:12Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-12-05T15:25:12Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2024-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Egorov P. A. The Concept of Aesthetic Experience Based on the Theory of Sacrum by R. Otto. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2024, vol. 40, issue 2, pp. 309–319. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2024.211 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2024.211
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/48121
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article is focused at the demarcation of the concept of aesthetic experience. This operation
  is carried out through a critical analysis of the theory of the Sacred by R. Otto, set out by him in
  the book published under the same title. It demonstrates the internal inconsistency of R. Otto’s
  desire to bring the Sacred as an autonomous experience, not association with aesthetics, on
  the basis of neo-Kantian philosophy, which gravitates towards the same aesthetics. This contradiction
  of task and method, placed in a wider context of consideration, allows us to define
  aesthetic experience. Aesthetic experience is the mode of considering any possible experience
  according to the specific rules of the discipline of aesthetics. In this sense, pure experience is
  only an illusory perspective from the sensory overload of discourse with pre-conceptual expressions,
  from the aspect of intensity. The experience itself is completely reduced to a mode
  of expression, and has no characteristics of its own. Experience is the junction of the pre-conceptual
  and the conceptual, infinitely segmentable but never grasped, only always reducible to
  expression, hermeneutic (meaning) and non-hermeneutic (presence). Aesthetic experience,
  on the other hand, is experience interpreted in the light of the fact that existence is indistinguishable
  from representation, experience understood in a deontologized sense.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 40; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: aesthetic experience
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sacred
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: R. Otto
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: intensity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: discourse
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The Concept of Aesthetic Experience Based on the Theory of Sacrum by R. Otto
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 2024+(2),11.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/48121/1/2024%2b%282%29%2c11.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 610,45 kB