title: Trade liberalization and trade facilitation: Two paths to one goal
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Vorontsova, Natalia A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Klimova, Irina A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-04-20T18:13:18Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-04-20T18:13:18Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Vorontsova, Natalia A., Irina A. Klimova. 2021. “Trade liberalization and trade facilitation: Two paths to one goal”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 1: 167–183.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.112
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/28070
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article defines trade liberalization and trade facilitation, highlighting their characteristics,
  some of which are inherent to both processes, while others differ. The authors analyze the impact
  of transborder production in a number of South-East Asian states on the development of
  their economies, as well as the role of trade facilitation in these processes. The article dwells on
  the economic impact of trade liberalization and facilitation, their synergistic interaction and
  peculiarities from the point of view of legal regulation. The authors come to the conclusion
  that trade liberalization and facilitation generally aim to achieve a common goal of promoting world trade, which in the long run will help to address one of the global problems — an immense
  wealth gap between developed and least developed countries. To achieve this goal, both
  liberalization and trade facilitation use their own tools, a set of practical measures enshrined
  in international legal instruments. At the same time, implementation of these measures often
  involves major risks, especially for developing economies. As a result, a strategy for implementing
  trade liberalization and facilitation measures needs to be developed, which would
  define the sequence of steps for each state individually and would take into account all the
  potential difficulties that a state may have while opening up the market. It is also necessary to
  create and improve the relevant regulatory and institutional framework for trade relations and
  implementation of reforms.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 12; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: trade liberalization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: trade facilitation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: protectionism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: trade barriers
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: customs formalities
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: supply chains
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Trade liberalization and trade facilitation: Two paths to one goal
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 167-183.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/28070/1/167-183.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 672,51 kB