title: Coup d’État at the Age of Formation of the Early Modern State
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Fyodorov, Sergey E.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kliuchko, Boris I.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2018-09-21T10:48:53Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2018-09-21T10:48:53Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Fyodorov S. E., Kliuchko B. I. Coup d’État at the Age of Formation of the Early Modern State. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2018, vol. 63, issue 3, pp. 898–907.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu02.2018.314
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/14921
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In the 1980s the concept of “État modernе” gained more and more ground in the French
  historiography, and conventional statist concepts came in for severe criticism. The debate
  centred around not only general approaches concerning continuity of political processes
  from Antiquity to Modern times, but also around more specific issues, which, nevertheless,
  required serious reconsideration. With regard to this, the phenomenon of coup d’État and its
  interpretation in accordance with the development of État modernе is of exceptional interest.
  In the Early Modern time, there were no mechanisms of the dialogue between rulers and
  political communities. The absence of dialogue didn’t mean the absence of conflict, therefore,
  the only remaining means of resolving such conflicts was political cataclysm (including a
  coup d’état), and it was absolutely ordinary and imperative in the existing framework at the
  time. In order to outline the main features of coups d’État during the period of genesis of État
  moderne, it‘s necessary to systematize this phenomenon and to consider concrete examples of
  this classification. The most frequent form of coups d’état, and historically the first one at the
  time, was usurpation, which was quite natural — as the power was physically represented in
  the body of the sovereign. The second form of coups d’État typical of the period of the genesis
  of État modernе were extraordinary actions in the course of dynastic crises. The third form of
  coups d’état in the period of the genesis of État moderne were coups disguised as the struggle
  against conspiracy.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: This article has been written with support from the Russian National Fund for the Humanities (RGHF)
  (grant N 16-01-00108а) and St. Petersburg State University (project No. 11517076)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Volume 63; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Early Modern Western Europe
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Early Modern State
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: coup d’État
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Coup d’État at the Age of Formation of the Early Modern State
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 14-Fyodorov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/14921/1/14-Fyodorov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 654,99 kB