title: About the legal nature of “non-working days”
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Filippova, Marina V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Khokhlov, Roman E.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-12-01T14:11:38Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-12-01T14:11:38Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38628
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The changes in public life caused by the coronavirus pandemic have created many problems
  in many different areas. The sphere of social and labor relations was no exception, which was
  perhaps the most significantly affected by these events. Among the various measures taken
  by the state to reduce the risk of mass infection, there are also such measures as suspending
  the activities of organizations, and, consequently, the ore activities of their employees. In the
  regulatory legal acts that introduced these measures, such suspension of work is called “nonworking
  days”. Since these regulations do not contain any specifics, it is necessary to determine
  which of the known labor-legal categories “non-working days” belong to in order to apply the
  relevant norms in practice. In the Arsenal of Russian labor legislation, there is a category, all
  the signs of which coincide with the signs of “non-working days” — this is an exemption from
  work. Classification of types of work release by different criteria gives a strong reason to assert
  that “non-working days” are one of its types. This means that all the legal consequences of
  “non-working days” coincide with the consequences that a particular type of exemption from
  work entails: this applies to the inclusion of this period in different types of seniority, the preservation
  of the employee’s place of work during this period, and therefore the impossibility of
  changing the terms of the employment contract without his consent, including earnings saved
  for this period in average earnings, etc. These practical conclusions have become possible precisely because the corresponding legal qualification of the nature of “non-working days” has
  been given, even though their name is clearly unfortunate.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Russian Journal of Labour & Law;Volume 11
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: non-working days
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: coronavirus pandemic
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: exemption from work
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: source of labor law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: employment contract
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: right to health protection
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: About the legal nature of “non-working days”
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 72-88.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/38628/1/72-88.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 667,3 kB