title: PHENOMENOLOGY AND SYMBOL: FROM HUSSERL TO BACHELARD
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: SOKOLOV, BORIS
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-07-08T10:10:50Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-07-08T10:10:50Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: SOKOLOV B. PHENOMENOLOGY AND SYMBOL: FROM HUSSERL TO BACHELARD. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2020, vol. 9, issue 1, pp. 235–255.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-1-235-255
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/18576
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: “Blindness” to the problem of the symbol necessarily follows from the main positions of the research
  strategy of Husserl phenomenology. However, both noema and noesis, as well as the flow of cogitations
  in our minds are initially infected with symbolism, and therefore the project of phenomenological
  description needs a “symbolic correction.” The supposed and experienced object is supposed as a symbolically
  filled object, and the position of the ego describing, constituting, experiencing its object is
  not only initially infected with cultural symbolism, but also represents the “assemblage point” of any
  phenomenon as a “constellation” formation. Symbolism is initially “embedded” in any phenomenon
  and in any scheme of “pure” consciousness. Correspondingly, the flow of phenomena that can be subjected
  to both noematic and noetic description proceeds according to various “scenarios,” “schemes,”
  which are nationally and culturally based, and do not follow the single universal route (Past, Present,
  Future), which is peculiar only to the new European model of time. This drawback of Husserl’s project
  was overcome in varying degrees by some phenomenologically oriented philosophers. The author of
  the article analyzes one of such “symbolic adjustments” by reference to the poetic topology (microphenomenology)
  of poetic image of the Home in the text of French philosopher G. Bachelard.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: This research is supported by the RFBR (Russian Foundation for Basic Research) research grant
  No. 18-011-00570 А “French Philosophy of the Classical Era as a National Project: History and
  Self-Awareness.”
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 9; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Husserl
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: phenomenology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: image
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: home
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: symbol
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Bachelard
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: microphenomenology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: PHENOMENOLOGY AND SYMBOL: FROM HUSSERL TO BACHELARD
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 235-255.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/18576/1/235-255.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 656,8 kB