title: Expertise as a form of development of science: Fundamental vs applied
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Pruzhinin, Boris I.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Vetrov, Vladimir A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-02-06T16:55:36Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-02-06T16:55:36Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Pruzhinin B. I., Vetrov V. A. Expertise as a form of development of science: Fundamental vs applied. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2022, vol. 38, issue 4, pp. 534–546. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.408 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.408
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38970
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article discusses the epistemological functions of expertise in modern science and substantiates
  the thesis that the emergence of expert knowledge is associated with the transformations
  of science (its technization, digitalization and application) and the anthropological crisis of the
  20th–21st centuries. The authors believe that due to expert assessments, the target settings that
  are present in specific scientific research programs are explicated — both cognitive ones and
  focused primarily on solving various kinds of socially significant practical problems. Thus, the
  examination, in fact, opens up opportunities for clarifying the most effective ratio of fundamental
  and applied research settings in a particular cognitive activity. The authors demonstrate that
  expert activity allows scientists to consciously (with appeals to the semantic content of specific
  research projects) and, thus, more adequately (taking into account applied problems) assess the
  epistemological prospects of certain areas of research and thereby contribute to the expansion
  of the scope of scientific knowledge, development science as a cultural and historical phenomenon.
  To concretize the reasoning, the authors focus on how the implementation of the cognitive
  functions of expertise in science takes place and appeal to the legal precedent (the Kass vs. Kass
  process), which has become one of the models for resolving disputes in the field of biomedical
  research of objects with an unstable subject, ethical and legal status (cryopreserved embryos).
  Particular attention is paid to the fundamental predictive functions of expert knowledge, which has dignity, i. e. taking into account socio-political and existential-humanitarian restrictions, on
  the one hand, and contributing to the expansion of the scientific horizon, on the other.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The research has been performed within the project supported by Russian Science Foundation
  no. 22-28-01632 «Expert examination as an epistemological phenomenon in the context of distinction
  between fundamental and applied guidelines in science».
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 38; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: expertise
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: peer review
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: science
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: applied research
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: basic research
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: bioethics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: biomedical expertise
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Expertise as a form of development of science: Fundamental vs applied
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 08.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/38970/1/08.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 694,36 kB