title: Ways of post-metaphysical thinking about God
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Konacheva, Svetlana A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kyrlezhev, Alexander I.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-05-08T09:39:07Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-05-08T09:39:07Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Konacheva S. A., Kyrlezhev A. I. Ways of post-metaphysical thinking about God. Issues of Theology, 2020, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 177–198.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: http://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2020.111
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17577
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In the conversation, various strategies of theological thought of the second half of
  the 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries are considered, which are characterized
  by a repulsion of the old metaphysical concept of God as, above all, a higher
  being. Against the background of criticism of such onto-theological theology undertaken
  by Martin Heidegger, various theological directions arise and develop,
  within the framework of which the boundary between philosophy and theology,
  established by default in the Modernity, is blurred. In the monograph of Svetlana
  Konacheva, the discussion of which is devoted to the conversation, the Russianspeaking
  reader encounters the positions of such authors as Eberhardt Jungel, Bernhard
  Welte, Wilhelm Weishedel, Heinrich Ott, John Caputo, Richard Kearney, as
  well as modern Orthodox philosophers and theologians David Bentley Hart and
  John Panteleimon Manussakis. The post-metaphysical thinking that these authors
  demonstrate is considered in connection with traditional Christian dogmatics. It
  touches on issues related to the phenomenological and hermeneutic approaches,
  as well as topics of religious language and the significance of deconstruction for
  theological thought. The influence of not only Heidegger, but also Hegel, as well as
  Jacques Derrida, is discussed. The conversation introduces into the problem areas of
  modern theological thought that are not well-known to the domestic reader.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Issues of Theology;Volume 2; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: philosophy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: theology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: phenomenology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: hermeneutics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: post-metaphysical thinking
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: religious language
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Heidegger
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: impossible
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: weak theology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Ways of post-metaphysical thinking about God
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 177-198.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17577/1/177-198.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 716,62 kB