title: The Oxford movement and the English reformation
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Baryshnikov, Vladimir N.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Borisenko, Victor N.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Stetckevich, Mikhail S.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2018-01-24T12:01:57Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2018-01-24T12:01:57Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2017-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Baryshnikov V. N., Borisenko V. N., Stetckevich M. S. The Oxford movement and the English reformation. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2017, vol. 62, issue 4, pp. 826– 838.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu02.2017.410
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/8920
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article examines the attitude of the leading figures of the initial stage (1833–1845) of the Oxford
  (Tractarian) movement — J. H. Newman, J. Keble, R. H. Froude, E. B. Pusey, W. Ward, F. Oakeley towards
  English Reformation, and the estimation of their opinion by religious and secular circles of English society.
  The article demonstrates that tractarians have departed to a great extent from tradition of benevolent
  assessment of the Reformation that prevailed in the Church of England. It was the logical result of their
  aspirations to present the Church of England not as the Protestant Church, but as a branch of Ancient
  undivided Catholic Church. The controversy that started after the publication of R. H. Froude’s “Remains”
  (1838–1839), the first tractarian treatise in which a negative assessment of the Reformation was made
  clear, and of J. H. Newman’s “Tract 90” demonstrated that the position of members of the Oxford movement
  had no support in the Church of England as well as in the society. Rejection of the heritage of the
  English Reformation was perceived as a rejection of Anglican identity. After the “apostasy” of Newman,
  Ward and Oakeley in 1845, those tractarians, who stayed in the Church of England and their descendants,
  Anglo-Catholics, significantly reduced the degree of their rejection of English Reformation, or preferred
  not to pronounce their opinion about the subject. At last by the end of the 19th century the compulsory
  characterization of the Church of England as “Protestant” had gradually faded making way for a more
  critical look at the Reformation. In the Anglican theology of the 20th century the view, according to which
  the Church of England is both “Catholic” and “Reformed”, became predominant. Refs 53.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Volume 62; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the Oxford movement
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the Reformation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: English Reformation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: history of England
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: tractarians
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: J. H. Newman
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: The Church Of England
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The Oxford movement and the English reformation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 10-Baryshnikov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/8920/1/10-Baryshnikov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 659,12 kB