title: Church court in Russia: The view of a lawyer
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Erokhina, Yulia V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-07-16T11:44:17Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-07-16T11:44:17Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Erokhina Yu. V. Church court in Russia: The view of a lawyer. Issues of Theology, 2020, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 315–340.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2020.209
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/18706
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In the article, the author attempts to consider the church court through the prism
  of a theoretical analysis of some aporias of the church court and their implementation
  in practice. As a rule, aporias arise based on the fact that contradictions are
  inherent in the object itself or its perception. The author analyzes the aporia of
  the church court, fictitious, logically correct statements and judgments about the
  nature and activities of the church court, which cannot be put into practice without
  resolving the contradictions. The first aporia: the basis of the judicial activity
  of the church should be unchanged. The second aporia: the activity of the church
  court should be considered outside the state system of secular law. An appeal in
  the article to pre-revolutionary church and secular law will help to partially reveal
  the principles of church proceedings and structure, and to reveal contradictions
  in the understanding of modern church court. Depending on the relationship
  between the church and the state, their interaction, the model of the church court
  is transformed: the church court is part of the state judicial system or the church
  court is not part of the state judicial system. The author concludes that the indicated
  aporia of a church court are logically correct judgments. Aporias reveal
  contradictions in views on church court from the part of church and secular law.
  Many contradictions and intractable issues were identified during the state judicial
  reform by Emperor Alexander II, but they were not taken into account in
  modern times when creating a modern church court. The Statute of the Church
  Court contains legal categories of secular law. The Russian Orthodox Church is
  faced with the task of resolving the contradictions associated with the nature and
  activity of the church court. An explanation is provided why the considered aporia
  of the church court cannot yet be practically realized.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Issues of Theology;Volume 2; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russian Orthodox Church
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: The Statute of the Church
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: church court
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: church law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: canon law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: aporia
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Church court in Russia: The view of a lawyer
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 315-340.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/18706/1/315-340.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 743,15 kB