title: TREATY ON PROHIBITION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS 2017 AND PROSPECTIVE OF HIS APPLICATION
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Marusin, Igor S.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-03-04T09:43:10Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-03-04T09:43:10Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Marusin I. S. 2018. TREATY ON PROHIBITION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS 2017 AND PROSPECTIVE OF HIS APPLICATION. Pravovedenie 62 (1): 20–31.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu25.2018.102
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17119
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article analyzes content and consequences of the Treaty on prohibition of nuclear
  weapons, which was opened for signing in September 2017. This Treaty for the first time prohibits to the states, which would ratify it, use of nuclear weapons and demands annihilation
  of all nuclear weapons. But it is very improbable that states, which possess now
  nuclear weapons, would ratify this Treaty and so the main goal of this Treaty — liquidation
  of all nuclear weapons on Earth — would not be achieved in the near future. But even so
  this Treaty has considerable political and juridical meaning. After his entering into force
  instead of now existing four regional nuclear-free zones would be created united, global
  nuclear-free zone, to which could join states from the regions, where such zone does not
  exist, for example, neutral states from Europe. Also after the entering of this Treaty into
  force use of nuclear weapons against any of the states-parties to this Treaty or on the
  territory of such state might be considered by this state as an international crime, and
  persons, which had given order for such use and persons that had fulfilled such an order
  might be considered as war criminals. Also use of nuclear weapons on the territory of
  states-parties to this Treaty might fall under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal
  Court. In the end author comes to the conclusion that a full prohibition of nuclear weapons
  could be only achieved as a result of long process and that the conclusion of analyzed
  Treaty may be a part of such a process.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 62; Issue 1 (336)
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: law of international security
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: nuclear disarmament
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: international treaty
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: prohibition of arms of mass destruction
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: nuclear-free zones
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: TREATY ON PROHIBITION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS 2017 AND PROSPECTIVE OF HIS APPLICATION
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 20-31.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17119/1/20-31.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 666,22 kB