title: Transformation of digital diplomacy in the face of new challenges: A view from Washington and Beijing
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Krivokhizh, Svetlana V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Telenga, Marina P.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-09-04T19:54:43Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-09-04T19:54:43Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2024-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Krivokhizh S. V., Telenga M. P. Transformation of digital diplomacy in the face of new challenges: A view from Washington and Beijing. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 2024, vol. 17, issue 2, pp. 143–163. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2024.203 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2024.203
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/47432
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Globalization has created a new media landscape within which public diplomacy is implemented
  and has posed three challenges for practitioners of traditional public diplomacy. First,
  diplomats and foreign ministries have lost their monopoly on diplomatic communication as
  non-governmental organizations, civil society organizations, activists, bloggers and even terrorist
  groups have been able to disseminate public diplomacy messages online. Second, the
  “new” actors in public diplomacy have transformed the digital world into a competitive arena
  in which multiple actors vie for the attention of digital audiences, attempting to influence their
  understanding of world events. Third, there has been a fragmentation of the public diplomacy
  audience into “selective influence networks.” How states adapt to these new conditions is of
  significant scientific interest. In the article, the authors compare the digital diplomacy strategies
  of the two largest actors in modern politics — the United States and China. Both official
  documents and practical steps, as well as discussions in the scientific community of the two
  countries are analyzed. The authors conclude that despite the fact that at the initial stages the
  digital diplomacy of the USA and the PRC differed both conceptually and instrumentally, due
  to digitalization and datification of international relations, states have to test various formats
  and tools that were not previously typical for them, react to opponents’ activity and constantly
  adjust their strategies. It can be concluded that in conditions of uncertainty, high competition
  and algorithm manipulation, the differences in digital diplomacy between the United States
  and China are becoming increasingly blurred.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. International Relations;Volume 17; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: digital diplomacy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: United States of America
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: People’s Republic of China
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: digitalization of public diplomacy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: datafication
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Transformation of digital diplomacy in the face of new challenges: A view from Washington and Beijing
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 6-2-2024+для+сайта-33-53.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/47432/1/6-2-2024%2b%d0%b4%d0%bb%d1%8f%2b%d1%81%d0%b0%d0%b9%d1%82%d0%b0-33-53.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 717,14 kB