title: Historian in a Military Overcoat of a Volunteer
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Morozova, Olga M.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-06-29T11:56:27Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-06-29T11:56:27Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Morozova O. M. A Historian in a Military Overcoat of a Volunteer. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2023, vol. 68, issue 2, рp. 557–568. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2023.216 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2023.216
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/41711
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article is a review of the monograph by the St Petersburg historian A. S. Puchenkov “The
  first year of the Volunteer Army: from the emergence of the Alekseevskaia organization to the
  formation of the Armed Forces in the South of Russia (November 1917 — December 1918)”
  (St Petersburg: Vladimir Dal, 2021. 813 p.). The main task of the book is to present the most
  comprehensive chronology of events. The conclusions of the monograph about the role of
  key events and figures during the initial stage of the existence of the Volunteer Movement —
  M. V. Alekseev, A. M. Kaledin, V. V. Shulgin, A. I. Denikin, ataman P. N. Krasnov — are of the
  greatest interest for the review. This article focuses on the author’s position on debatable issues:
  on the correctness of choosing the Don as a springboard for gathering the future army;
  on the consequences of the decisions concerning the directions and goals of the First and
  Second Kuban campaigns; on the influence of relationships between leaders on the fate of the
  movement; on the results of military and state building for the first year of the existence of the
  Volunteer Movement. The review also makes critical remarks regarding the methods of working
  sources, too heterogeneous and contradictory to be used as a single explanatory basis. The
  approach of the author of the monograph is also characterized by his selective attitude to the
  opinions of eyewitnesses, in particular, more favourable to representatives of the mainstream,
  pro-Denikin, direction of white émigré literature.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Volume 68; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Civil War in Russia
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: 1918
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Volunteer Army
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Cossacks of the South of Russia
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: memoirs of white emigration
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Historian in a Military Overcoat of a Volunteer
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 16.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/41711/1/16.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 630,74 kB