title: Nature and essential characteristics of classical rationality
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Levytskyy, Viktor S.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-11-14T10:33:59Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-11-14T10:33:59Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Levytskyy V. S. Nature and essential characteristics of classical rationality. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2019, vol. 35, issue 3, pp. 430–446.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.304
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16580
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The 20th century began under the sign of deconstruction of the classical comprehension of
  substantiality of history, culture and mind. It turned out that each culture has its unique worldview
  universals and a conclusion has been made that there is a principal difference between
  classical and modern cultural worlds, and in the rationalities characteristic to them. In the
  article, based on V. Stepin’s conception of scientific rationality, the essential characteristics of
  the classical mind, which possess heuristic potentials when comparing pre-modern and modern
  rationality, are explicated. In particular, the ontologism of the pre-modern mind has been
  distinguished and substantiated based on historical and philosophical material — rootedness
  in being, only partially related to man; its hierarchy is the dependence of cognitive possibilities
  on the ontological level of the entities opening to the mind; and the transcendence is the
  fundamental incomprehensibility of the bases and “guarantors” of the mind and the world for
  the mind itself. Within the framework of the classical mind, archetypical principles of Western
  rationality were formulated as such, some of which, after the secularization of medieval
  culture, became the principle of organizing secular social reality, which ultimately led to the
  emergence of a new social reality, later called Modernism.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 35; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: mind
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: rationality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: modernity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ontology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: hierarchy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: transcendence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Nature and essential characteristics of classical rationality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 430-446.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16580/1/430-446.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 641,94 kB