title: Counteraction of Iran and Russia to Economic Sanctions: Similarity and Distinction of Strategy
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Radikov, Ivan V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-05-26T12:50:10Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-05-26T12:50:10Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Radikov I. V. Counteraction of Iran and Russia to Economic Sanctions: Similarity and Distinction of Strategy. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 2020, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 113–127.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2020.107
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17873
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article attempts to conduct a comparative analysis of strategy of counteraction for Iran and
  Russia to economic sanctions as modern foreign policy means of compulsion are undertaken.
  The author starts with the unacceptability and illegitimacy of the sanction regimes established by
  the USA and their satellites without the decision of the Security Council of the United Nations. It is
  underlined that sanctions are directed on restricting or influencing the sovereignty and sovereign
  political policy by means of measures of economic character, destabilization of the political system
  and a change of a state’s political policy, a political mode. In formation of a modern Russian
  policy to counter the pressure of sanctions it is possible and it is necessary to consider not only
  domestic experience, but also the practices of other states, in particular Iran which has been
  under the influence of sanctions for several decades. As a strategy of countering economic sanctions,
  Iran invokes the methods of economic mobilization to diversify export and import, external
  relations of the state, search for new partners and its features of state activity in organizing import
  substitution are of interest. Recognizing the prospect of preservation and the essential damage
  done by economic sanctions, the article concludes with the necessity to diversify external relations
  of the state. Priorities in the policy of countering sanctions are also identified: international
  trade development, creation of alternative financial systems of calculations, import substitution,
  creation of an effective and developed economy that has a high level of stability.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Political Expertise: POLITEX;Volume 16; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sanctions
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sanctions regime
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sanctions policy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: policies of counteraction
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: legitimacy of sanctions
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Counteraction of Iran and Russia to Economic Sanctions: Similarity and Distinction of Strategy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 113-127.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17873/1/113-127.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 686,49 kB