title: The crisis of the genre and the symptoms of style: the problem of monumentality in the new Russian art
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kotlomanov, Alexander O.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-06-26T17:43:27Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-06-26T17:43:27Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Kotlomanov, Alexander. “The crisis of the genre and the symptoms of style: the problem of monumentality in the new Russian art”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts 9, no. 1 (2019): 110–124.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2019.106
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15784
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The current state of monumental art in Russia is analyzed in the context of global art and cultural trends. Examples of the newest Russian monuments that, in the philosophy of culture are symptoms of historical trends, is emphasized. The goal is to clarify this symptomatology for subsequent determination of the current situation in accordance with the theory of style. In the second half of the 20th century, monumental sculpture was in a state of crisis. There was a gap between aspirations of modern art and tastes of society. In critical publications, the idea that monuments separate us from history and soften our attitude to its tragic pages had been slipping. As a result, alternative versions of monuments and memorials were developed. The most interesting examples are counter-monuments, which suggest a controversial attitude to the topic, in contrast to the traditional monument, where such meaning is expressed unequivocally. The counter-monument raises the question shifting the response to the sphere of public debates. Thus art participates in the live course of history and calls us to think. The idea of such an alternative is ambiguous and raises questions. It is not clear to what extent these projects are related to the general context of art. Can they really compete with traditional monuments? And, finally, is this attitude to the monumental form relevant in contemporary Russia? The text attempts to answer these topical issues of contemporary theory and practice of art.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Arts;Volume 9; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: style
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: genre
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: monumentality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: monument
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russian art
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russian sculpture
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: modern art
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: modern sculpture
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The crisis of the genre and the symptoms of style: the problem of monumentality in the new Russian art
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 4862-Текст статьи-9783-1-10-20190422.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15784/1/4862-%d0%a2%d0%b5%d0%ba%d1%81%d1%82%20%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b0%d1%82%d1%8c%d0%b8-9783-1-10-20190422.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 630,31 kB