title: Adoption of views on quality management
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Skripko, Larisa E.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-12-02T13:55:01Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-12-02T13:55:01Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Skripko L. Е. 2022. Adoption of views on quality management. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management 21 (3): 395–428. http://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu08.2022.304 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: http://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu08.2022.304
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38661
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article analyzes and discusses different approaches to the periodization of scientific research
  on quality management problems that appeared over the last 120 years. Based on the analysis, the
  study proposes the author’s model of this scientific field development which includes three stages
  and describes each of them. The issues of periodization of the evolution of scientific knowledge
  are not popular and do not carry a practical orientation, however, without the systematization of
  the studied issues, it is impossible to understand the mechanisms of the emergence of new ideas,
  to assess the prospects and a long-term use of them as well as to predict the development of scientific
  fields. The consideration of the history of the development of quality management, which
  includes more than one century of doing various studies, is no exception. However, there is no
  generally accepted view on the retrospective of the stage-by-stage development of these scientific
  studies, which may cause a lack of understanding whether to include certain issues or not. Consideration
  of four- and seven-stage models shows a lack of clear transition from one dominant
  paradigm to another, it is not always possible to distinguish a period of “normal science” in each
  of the stages; for some stages there are no concepts that lose their relevance due to the anomalies
  that have appeared, and which should be discarded at the next stage of development. Therefore,
  there is a need for a retrospective analysis of evolutionary approaches to the transformation of
  views on quality management from modern positions.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Management;Volume 21; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: quality management
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: TQM
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: transformation of scientific views
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: stages of scientific field development
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Adoption of views on quality management
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 918.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/38661/1/918.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 2,1 MB