title: New economic geography: Thirty years later
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Zakharova, Evgeniya A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Davydov, Denis V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Zemtsova, Elena M.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-03-30T12:56:13Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-03-30T12:56:13Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Zakharova, E. A., Davydov, D. V. and Zemtsova, E. M. (2023) ‘New economic geography: Thirty years later’, St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, 39 (1), pp. 127–155. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2023.106 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2023.106
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/39447
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In the past three decades, many analytical and quantitative models have been developed that
  seek to explain the inequalities in the spatial distribution of wealth and people, from international
  and regional to urban. We show that a number of theoretical and empirical works
  have shaped the New Economic Geography, whose framework is defined by general equilibrium
  models, heterogeneity, and microeconomic data of quantitative models. Early theoretical
  work focused on stylized analytical models that made empirical research difficult. The transition
  to empirical research required a revision of the canonical assumptions that are used in the
  basic models. Quantitative models focus mainly on applied issues of spatial economics with
  significant public policy implications. Quantitative models validate the results of analytical
  models using classic micro-foundations borrowed from urban and transport economies. The
  challenge for the New Economic Geography is an interdisciplinary dialogue with institutional
  economics, economic sociology, and endogenous growth theory to explore the problems of
  institutional heterogeneity and inequality of opportunity. In fact, we can talk about the fusion
  of disciplines, which will allow us to apply the provisions of the New Economic Geography to
  the analysis of historical, geographical and other modes of functioning of institutions.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation within the
  framework of the scientific project No. 22-28-20358.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies;Volume 39; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: new economic geography
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: general equilibrium
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: monopolistic competition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: increasing returns
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: analytical and quantitative models
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: New economic geography: Thirty years later
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 06.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/39447/1/06.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 837,2 kB