title: Sovereignty as an economical and geographic phenomenon (employing trends in the development of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation)
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Pilyasov, A. N.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2018-01-29T14:22:14Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2018-01-29T14:22:14Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2017-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Pilyasov A. N. Sovereignty as an economical and geographic phenomenon (employing trends in the development of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation). Vestnik SPbSU. Earth Sciences, 2017, vol. 62, issue 3, pp. 280–299.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu07.2017.305
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/8989
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: A departure from the legal interpretation of the sovereignty of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation
  allows one to draw the tools and information resources of other Sciences into studying this concept.
  The author believes that economic geography can make a significant contribution. An economicgeographical
  approach to the problem of national sovereignty in the Arctic puts it in the context of
  space (the sovereignty of which is questioned), which is atomized on a micro-level of municipalities
  (districts and cities) and rural and urban settlements. The protection of their sovereignty is connected
  with the implementation of investment projects, livelihood of local communities, preservation of the
  traditional economy and way of life, territories of traditional residence and natural use of indigenous
  peoples, ongoing research (stationary and expedition) activities in the territory. The author suggests
  an understanding of sovereignty as a process, which has a different value (which changes) in specific
  periods of time. This approach is illustrated by two periods in the development of the Arctic zone of the
  Russian Federation: 2010–2013 and 2014–2017. The first period can be called a time of “exogenous”
  developments, when the question of the sovereignty of the Arctic territories and waters of Russia
  approved in the coordinates of the active international cooperation with other Arctic countries on all possible negotiating forums. The second period saw a radical change in the entire instrumentation of
  Arctic sovereignty in favor of domestic investment focus on large mining and infrastructure projects,
  land and transition zone “land-sea” and defense mobilization in the Arctic Islands and coastal areas.
  Refs 17. Tables 3.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Earth Sciences;Volume 62; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Sovereignty
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: trends in the development of the Arctic zone
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: economic-geography approach
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: support zone of the Arctic
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Sovereignty as an economical and geographic phenomenon (employing trends in the development of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 05-Pilyasov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/8989/1/05-Pilyasov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 666,34 kB