title: How to study the history of Eastern Europe today?
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Filyushkin, Alexander Ilyich
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-09-11T11:59:36Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-09-11T11:59:36Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Filyushkin A. I. How to study the history of Eastern Europe today? Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana, 2020, vol. 1 (27), pp. 3–24.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu19.2020.101
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/19435
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The author analyzes the historiographic situation that has developed in recent years on post-soviet
  space. He draws attention to the changing subject and nature of scientific research. In the historiography
  of the new nation-states, national history dominates, in their historical politics - nationalism. This weakens
  the scientific component, since national history in its characteristics is presentist and constructivist. She
  suffers from autarchy, the work of scientists is confined only to the national reader, and the products which
  is produced by national historiographies, has mainly domestic consumers, it is difficult to enter the world
  scientific platform with it. An indicator of the situation is the absence of indexing scientific journals of these
  countries in international highly rated databases (unlike Russia, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Moldova, which
  are more oriented to international scientific criteria). There is a reduction in the study of world history, and
  the history of Russia interpreted in the spirit of the corresponding historical policy and practically not studied
  in the scientific plan. The article offers an overview of relevant research areas and concludes that scientific
  integration and the development of a new general concept of the history of the Central-Eastern Europe.
  Comparative studies are promising here; it is useful to include in the field of comparison and the Balkans
  and the countries of Central Europe. In the pre-imperial period, the studied historical region in general, it
  would be more correct to define Central-Eastern Europe from the Elbe and the Danube to Don and Volga,
  from the Baltic to the Black Sea as a complete region. Historically, everything here was too intertwined and
  interconnected to plunder it over national historic territories.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana;Volume 1 (27)
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: historiography
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: methodology of history
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Eastern Europe
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: post-soviet space
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: historical memory
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: How to study the history of Eastern Europe today?
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 3-24.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/19435/1/3-24.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 990,51 kB