title: Evolution of property in Cuba in a comparative perspective
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Benatti, Francesca
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-10-16T11:09:12Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-10-16T11:09:12Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Benatti, Francesca. 2023. Evolution of property in Cuba in a comparative perspective. Pravovedenie 67 (3): 284–304. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.303
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.303
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44251
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The essay examines the evolution of property in Cuba. It focuses in particular on the reforms
  that led to the recognition of private property in the 2019 Constitution and the first embryonic
  openings to the market. The different theories on the emergence of real rights and privatisation
  are then considered, with a comparison between the rapid and gradual privatisation models.
  The latter embodied by China and Vietnam, whose experience are analysed, seems to have
  achieved good results. China since Deng’s reforms has opened up to the market and the slow
  recognition of real rights was enshrined in the 2007 law. The balance achieved is taken up in the
  2021 code. The new phase, announced by Xi Jinping, is inspired by the idea of common prosperity.
  Vietnam with its Doi Moi policy followed a similar path and the difficult balance between
  the different visions was enshrined in the Constitution. It should be noted that socialist countries
  are trying, although not without contradictions, to discover their own model capable of guaranteeing
  individual protections and freedoms together with the development and improvement
  of quality of life. In this journey, the fundamental and indispensable establishment of property,
  contract, and enterprise must be balanced with the principles of equality and social justice that
  are or should be the foundation of their own experience.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 67; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: property rights
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: socialism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Cuba
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: constitution
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: reforms
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: comparative law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Evolution of property in Cuba in a comparative perspective
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 03.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/44251/1/03.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 957,96 kB