title: Mutual interference and strategic concepts of international relations in the inter-war period
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Niyazov, Niyazi Sabir ogly
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2018-08-16T14:33:06Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2018-08-16T14:33:06Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Niyazov N. S. Mutual interference and strategic concepts of international relations in the inter-war period. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 2018, vol. 11, issue 2, pp. 146–170.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu06.2018.203
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/14734
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The creation of Versailles-Washington system of international relations failed to provide
  conditions for the crisis-free development of the international society in 1918–1938. Contradictions
  provoked by unequal treaties with the defeated, especially with Germany, ignoring
  interests of Italy and the Soviet Union finally must have led to the collapse of the system,
  materialized in the new world war. Realization of these facts by military specialists in the very
  period of history made them work out new strategic concepts. Their main objective was to
  find new ways of conducting military operations in the forthcoming world war, which they
  thought to be inevitable. Great Britain, France, the USSR, Germany, Italy, the USA and Japan
  made the most persistent efforts in concept development. Besides the modeling of conditions,
  under which future war should be waged, authors of a set of concepts paid attention to the
  preparation of civilian population and industry to the warfare. In the USSR due to the prevailing
  ideology experts focused on the political aspect of the future war. By the way, the creation
  of a strategic paradigm influenced the external policy of the state. Thus, the very fact that the
  strategic concept included the idea that the future war will be waged by blocks of states made
  the political leaders look for allies. Similarly, the assumption that in the future military conflict
  certain weapon system may complete strategic tasks could make the states which didn’t possess
  such armament or had limited availability of it appear on the international arena calling
  to constraint, prohibit or eliminate certain kinds of weapon and equipment.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. International Relations;Volume 11; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: international relations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: strategic concepts
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: armed forces
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: military technologies
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: world war
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Mutual interference and strategic concepts of international relations in the inter-war period
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 03-Niyazov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/14734/1/03-Niyazov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 702,37 kB