title: Philosophy as an imaginary mountain ascent
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Pertsev, Aleksandr V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-10-06T10:50:20Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-10-06T10:50:20Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Pertsev A. V. Philosophy as an imaginary mountain ascent. Philosophy of the History of Philosophy, 2022, vol. 3, pp. 9–24. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu34.2022.101 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu34.2022.101
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44109
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In connection with the discussion initiated in Russia by Professor N. S. Kirabaev
  about the role of philosophy as a worldview and its significance for education, the
  author of the article proposes to consider philosophy as a worldview in the light
  of modernity. It comes from philological roots, which interpret “worldview” as an
  expression of a view of the world from outside and from above. Analyzing today’s
  worldview processes in Western society, the author points to a turn in which broadcasting
  on behalf of the Present is replaced by something else, fundamentally different.
  In the 17th –19th centuries, Western philosophy firmly put forward a reliable
  idea of the Present and, on this basis, expressed reliable judgments about the Future
  of mankind. At the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries, contempt
  for the Present and confusion before the Future are imposed on Western society.
  This can be overcome only by returning to the Past, however, in such a way that this
  return turns into, as it were, a second beginning. The first beginning led to a dead
  end, because it was based solely on technical ideas. But it is precisely the Middle
  Ages, with its reliable moral guidelines, that is called upon to take over — as the
  theology of modernity — in the place of a rational interpretation of the world. The
  article deals with the ideas of Bede the Venerable, the theological ideas of Francesco
  Petrarca, Dante Alighieri — in the interpretation of G. Lebon, M. Heidegger, R. Guardini,
  P. Sloterdijk.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Philosophy of the History of Philosophy;Volume 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: G. Lebon
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: F. Petrarch
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Bede the Venerable
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Dante Alighieri
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: M. Heidegger
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: R. Guardini
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: P. Sloterdijk
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: theology as a justification for the ethics of modernity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: medieval philosophy as an apology for spiritual ascent
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: G. Lebon’s concept of great nations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Philosophy as an imaginary mountain ascent
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 9-24.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/44109/1/9-24.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 649,85 kB