title: Forgotten Past: The Legal Status Of The Cooperative Labor On Domestic Legislation
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Khokhlov, Evgeniy B.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-12-01T14:46:13Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-12-01T14:46:13Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38640
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article deals with the legal status of labor cooperatives of different types on the domestic
  legislation. A general legal status of labor cooperatives, as well as exchange cooperatives, cooperatives
  sailors, et al. Analyzed the place cooperatives in the employment relationship (as
  an employer as well as on the side of the employee). As an employer, the artel acted in the case
  of an employment contract with an individual who were not member of cooperative. In the
  case where the artel was on the side of the employee (contractor), the article examines two options.
  In the first version with the artel of an employment contract. However, in this case, the
  employment relationship does not arise between the employer and the artel, and between the
  employer and each individual member of the cooperative; artel also acted as an organizational
  form for optimal work organization and management of labor productivity of the members
  of the artel. The second option would conclude with a team of contract. In this case, there
  were two kinds of relationships: under the contract between the customer and the contractor,
  in which the role of the contractor assumes the labor cooperative as a entity and cooperative
  relations with its members, in which the artel acted as an employer. This article discusses the
  possible uses of the farm in modern conditions: as a form of employee participation in the
  affairs of the employer, as a kind of contract labor (in particular in order to safeguard the
  property of the employer).
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Russian Journal of Labour & Law;Volume 11
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: legislation of the Russian Empire
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: New Economic Policy legislation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: labor cooperative
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: exchange cooperative
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: association
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: material liability
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: agency work
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: social partnership
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Forgotten Past: The Legal Status Of The Cooperative Labor On Domestic Legislation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 229-245.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/38640/1/229-245.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 684,81 kB