title: “Industrialization of Power”: Russian Political Transit in Socio- Technological Dimension
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Dakhin, Andrey V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-02-12T10:21:47Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-02-12T10:21:47Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Dakhin A. V. “Industrialization of Power”: Russian Political Transit in Socio- Technological Dimension. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 2019, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 460–482.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2019.402
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17075
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Industrialization of state power is described as a global trend marked by “documentalization” and
  “governmentalization”. Russia’s political transit is discussed as a process of implementing industrial
  technologies into the state system’s activity. In accordance with L. Mumford’s ideas, the
  political system is described in terms of industrial “megamachine” which generates flows of disciplinary
  orders. They cover all fields of activity of state power and interactions between the state
  and the civil society. An analysis Russia state power’s practices of industrialization provides for
  critical rethinking of popular conceptual approaches and identifying the field of public policy as a
  space where three social technologies of political interactions between the state and the citizens
  are implemented. In the light of this approach Russia’s democracy transit is viewed as the consecutive
  implementation into the public policy, first, of technology of representative democracy
  (in the 1990s), then of technology of deliberation democracy (since 2012), and of technology of
  participatory democracy (since 2018). It allows to highlight various aspects of these implementation
  processes, including some risks with objectionable contradictions between these different
  technologies, and it was important to emphasize the efforts towards harmonization. Putting cyber-informational technologies into practice in the state administrative policy leads towards industrialization
  of velocity, capacity and structure for gathering data. The gap between elementary
  labour operations of ordinary officials and regimes of optimal use of cyber-informational systems
  of the state bureaucracy is also noted. In conclusion, the author focuses on the area of state and
  municipal services, where the trend of industrialization of documents elaboration is in progress.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Political Expertise: POLITEX;Volume 15; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russia
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: industrialization of state power
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: megamachine
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: technologies of public policy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: technologies of state administration
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: technologies of state and municipal services making
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: “Industrialization of Power”: Russian Political Transit in Socio- Technological Dimension
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 460-482.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17075/1/460-482.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 717,03 kB