title: Trinity of museum, archive and library in the projective philosophy of N. F. Fedorov: Modern interpretation
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Poltavskaya, Elena I.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2017-12-17T11:34:42Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2017-12-17T11:34:42Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2017-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Poltavskaya E. I. Trinity of museum, archive and library in the projective philosophy of N. F. Fedorov: Modern interpretation. Vestnik SPbSU. Philosophy and Conflict studies, 2017, vol. 33, issue 4, pp. 563–570.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.414
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/8783
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The author presents parallels between the views of N. F. Fedorov on the trinity of the library,
  archive, museum and the essential similarity of these social groups. The idea of N. F. Fedorov about
  the museum (archive, library) as the “council of persons” is interpreted as the notion of “museum
  (archive, library) — a social institution”, the structure of which the author represents in the form of
  the system of two interacting and interdependent elements: subject of propose and subject of demand.
  The subject of propose is the creator (manufacturer) of some product; the subject of the demand is
  the consumer.
  The structural identity of the notions “archive”, “library”, “museum” as defined by a schematic of
  their content displays the basic similarity of these institutions that creates a (archival, library, museum)
  document that is particular only to them and provides it to the use of the public. The similarity of
  archives, libraries, museums determines their modern convergence and the ability to exist in a unified
  organizational form, denoted by a new term “lambrary”. The archival science, library science and
  museology, studying the communication that is carried out in the archives, libraries and museums,
  they can be combined in a single classification field under one name. Refs 11.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 33; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: library
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: archive
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: muzeum
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: lambrary
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: scheme
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: notion
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Trinity of museum, archive and library in the projective philosophy of N. F. Fedorov: Modern interpretation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 14-Poltavskaya.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/8783/1/14-Poltavskaya.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 646,26 kB