title: Logic of trial
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Ul’bashev, Alim Kh.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-12-11T12:37:21Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-12-11T12:37:21Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Ul’bashev, Alim Kh. 2019. “Logic of trial”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 3: 477–490.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.305
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16800
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This article is devoted to the application of logical techniques and methods in trial proceedings.
  The author proceeds from the fact that the logic of proving, in other words the use of arguments, cannot be excluded from the subject of civil procedure doctrine. Logic as a general
  scientific instrument of knowledge acquires a significant specificity in the civil procedure. The
  author starts with consideration of general mathematical and philosophical concepts of logic,
  subsequently shifting them to procedural matter and thereby showing the unity of methodology
  and the conceptual apparatus of logic. Thus, there is an attempt to overcome the gap that
  exists between the two fundamental sciences — formal logic and civil procedure. The author
  emphasizes that the correct application of logical laws and rules in proving provides the possibility
  for the courts to make a legitimate and grounded decision. A critical assessment is
  made of the inattentive attitude to the practical problems of the logic of proving that exists in
  the Russian, and even in the Soviet literature on the civil procedure. The domestic doctrine
  is practically not engaged in the development and theoretical conceptualization of the basic
  methods of argumentation and proving, although it recognizes their importance. The article
  pays great attention to the study of the experience of the common law countries (England and
  the USA), where the theory and practice of proving has a much deeper history — in these
  countries the logic of proving is the subject of various independent legal studies. The final
  part of the article is devoted to an attempt to identify and explain the reasons for this imbalance,
  when the theory of the civil procedure largely ignores the existing problems of proving
  in practice. The author sees the roots of the problem in the existing practice in the Russian
  system of higher legal education to focus only on the main provisions of classical formal logic,
  not applying them to the specific features of the legal profession in general and the process of
  proving in particular.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 10; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: proving
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: methods of proving
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: argumentation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: legitimacy and validity of the judicial decisions
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: formal logic
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Logic of trial
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 477-490.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16800/1/477-490.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 653,3 kB