title: The modern literary prose in professional media criticism: Pragmastilistic analysis
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kolesnikova, Olga I.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-05-04T13:58:19Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-05-04T13:58:19Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Kolesnikova O. I. (2023). The modern literary prose in professional media criticism: Pragmastilistic analysis. Media Linguistics, 10 (1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2023.108 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2023.108
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/41414
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article is devoted to the identification and pragmastilistic characterization of the means of
  evaluating the interpretation of works of modern fiction by the authors of reviews and articles
  presented in the media content of the electronic literary magazine “Literratura” under the
  heading “Criticism” over the past three years. The purpose of the study is to analyze the evaluative
  judgments of critics based on a pragmaesthetic approach to discourse, i. e. taking into account
  the pragmatic attitude of the addressee of speech. Under the influence of the chosen role
  of the subject of critical discourse (“analyst” or “reader”), it can be dominated either by style
  standards objectified in line with the canonical genre of the review, or by subjective-evaluative
  ways of conceptualizing the reviewed work. It is established that modern professional media
  criticism is distinguished by intellectualized forms of evaluation, which manifest themselves
  in intertextuality, sensual metaphors and periphrases. In this case, the transfer of the critic’s
  attitude to the reviewed work is mainly implicit. The fact of the influence of “new Russian
  prose” on the style of the reviewer’s narration, which often imitates the author’s manner of
  creating a “second reality” and has pragmaesthetic effect, is revealed. The important feature of
  critical discourse, which brings it closer to blogistics in the case of choosing the position of the
  “reader”, is the transfer of the reader’s reflection of the subject of evaluation, acting in egocentric
  plane and not hiding subjectivism. At the level of verbal representation of the assessment,
  we can talk about the interaction of scientific, literary, artistic and colloquial discourses, about
  decrease in the stylistic register during irony, as well as due to professional jargonisms and colloquial
  forms that increase the degree of emotionality of critical media discourse.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Media Linguistics;Volume 10; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: professional critical media discourse
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: evaluative conceptualization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: pragmastilistic analysis
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: pragmaesthetic effect
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: emotionality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The modern literary prose in professional media criticism: Pragmastilistic analysis
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 128-143.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/41414/1/128-143.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 669,49 kB