title: F. M. Dostoevsky and A. N. Ostrovsky in the process of learning about the people (1860s)
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Mikhnovets, Nadezhda G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-02-25T20:40:38Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-02-25T20:40:38Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Mikhnovets N. G. F. M. Dostoevsky and A. N. Ostrovsky in the process of learning about the people (1860s). Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2021, 18 (3): 460–478.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2021.303
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/35256
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article examines the history of formation and development of Fyodor Dostoevsky’s “soil
  concepts” in the 1860s in the light of his close attention to the work of Alexander Ostrovsky.
  Previously, researchers did not correlate the different positions of Ostrovsky and Dostoevsky
  in the writers’ shared process of the cognition of folk life. The main focus of the article is
  centered on revealing the dynamics of changes in Dostoevsky’s attitude towards the work of
  Ostrovsky: from the recognition of impartiality of the playwright’s portrayal of the Russian
  people to the belief of his misunderstanding of foundations of folk life and the conviction of
  the gradual increase in accusatory tones in its coverage, starting from the final resolution of
  the play Thunderstorm. The article identifies the areas of synchronicities and disagreements of
  the two writers from a problem-thematic standpoint. The work concludes that the main point
  of divergence in the writers’ understanding of the Russian people was, on the one hand, Dostoevsky’s
  certainty of the monolithic unity of the Russian people, anchored in the Orthodox
  faith, and, on the other, Ostrovsky’s idea that the fundamental crises of the mid-19th century
  encompass all strata of Russian society, without any exceptions. The idea of the significance
  of the Last Judgment in the life of the common people is identified as essential for Ostrovsky.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The article was prepared within the framework of a research project supported by the Russian
  Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) “The phenomenon of the Russian epic novel in the academic science
  of the XXI century: I. A. Goncharov, I. S. Turgenev, L. N. Tolstoy, F. M. Dostoevsky”. Project number
  20-012-00102.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 18; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: F. M. Dostoevsky
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: A. N. Ostrovsky
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: common people
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: literature
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: journalism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: F. M. Dostoevsky and A. N. Ostrovsky in the process of learning about the people (1860s)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 03_12131-Текст статьи-38622-1-10-20211118.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/35256/1/03_12131-%d0%a2%d0%b5%d0%ba%d1%81%d1%82%20%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b0%d1%82%d1%8c%d0%b8-38622-1-10-20211118.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 703,42 kB