title: ABOUT THE NATURE, CONCEPT AND LIMITS OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Burmagin, Sergey V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-03-04T09:48:47Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-03-04T09:48:47Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Burmagin S. V. 2018. ABOUT THE NATURE, CONCEPT AND LIMITS OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE. Pravovedenie 62 (1): 32–53.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu25.2018.103
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17120
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The definition of the essence and content of justice is one of the actual problems of
  domestic legal science. The notion of justice remains debatable, including in the area of
  criminal procedure. The question of what actions and decisions of the court are covered
  by the definition “criminal justice” is not only theoretical and doctrinal, but also methodological
  and practical importance for criminal proceedings. There is the essence of
  criminal justice reveals and definition of criminal justice formulates in this article. Author
  considers the existing views on the limits of criminal justice in science, reveals the essence
  of two opposite approaches: giving justice a narrow and broad meanings. Further
  in the article the author criticizes the limited (narrow) interpretation of criminal justice
  and argues its insolvency, based on the actual role of the judiciary in modern society
  and in the state-legal system of Russia. The analysis of the current legislation and legal
  positions of supreme courts of the Russian Federation allows the author to conclude that
  there are legal grounds for giving the concept of “criminal justice” wide significance and
  inclusion in it not only activities for the consideration of the criminal case, implying the
  decision of the question of guilt, responsibility and punishment of the accused, but also
  the resolution of other legal issues raised before the court in cases of judicial control and
  at the stage of execution of punishment. At the end of the article, in order to continue a
  comprehensive study of the limits (borders) of criminal justice, it is proposed to apply the
  criteria for classifying different types and forms of judicial activity as criminal justice, and
  as such criteria to use universally recognized signs of justice. The author devotes to this
  comparative analysis his following article “Signs and limits of criminal justice”.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 62; Issue 1 (336)
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: judicial power
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: court
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: justice
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: criminal procedure
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: judicial control
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: enforcement of sentence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: ABOUT THE NATURE, CONCEPT AND LIMITS OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 32-53.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17120/1/32-53.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 748,71 kB