title: On the stages of factory inspection from the “sanction model” to the “сonformity model”
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Yasinskaya-Kazachenko, Angelica V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-12-01T18:11:27Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-12-01T18:11:27Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38641
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The civil legislation of the beginning of the 19th century did not establish proper legal regulation
  of freelance labor, since most of the workers were serfs. At the same time, the need for such regulation
  was strongly felt, which led to increased attention to the labor issue and, as a result, to the
  formation of the Institute of factory inspection. The article provides a retrospective step-by-step
  analysis of the formation and development of factory inspection as a forerunner of the school
  of labor rights. In relation to the previous period, the lack of legal regulation is revealed, specific
  proposals are formulated to improve the norms of codified acts. An interpretation of the Keynesian
  theory of “deviation from equilibrium” through the prism of protecting economic and social
  interests is demonstrated, while it is shown that labor legislation can tend to a certain resultant,
  to the need to move from a “model of sanctions” to a “model of compliance”. Special attention is
  paid to the activities of I. I. Yanzhul, Professor of the Moscow Imperial University, who headed
  the factory Inspectorate of the Moscow district. Reference to his scientific and practical heritage
  allowed us to substantiate the conclusion about the undoubted influence of factory inspectors
  on the formation and development of not only domestic labor law, but also the corresponding
  branch of legal knowledge. This can be most clearly seen in the development of the system of Supervisory
  and control bodies and the change in their functions from simply detecting violations
  to helping to eliminate the causes that give rise to them, from resolving disputes to preventing
  them. The author substantiates the conclusion that from the standpoint of the constitutional
  right to protect economic and social interests, labor law is focused on reaching a compromise
  between the parties to social and labor relations.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Russian Journal of Labour & Law;Volume 11
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: monument of law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: flaw in legislation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: anticipatory claims
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: function of factory inspection
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: mandatory prescription
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: labor protection
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: On the stages of factory inspection from the “sanction model” to the “сonformity model”
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 246-260.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/38641/1/246-260.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 668,73 kB