title: Disagreement on the Gain Sharing Method in Supply Chain Collaborations
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Jung, Verena
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Peeters, Marianne
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Vredeveld, Tjark
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-02-01T10:29:12Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-02-01T10:29:12Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Jung V., Peeters M., Vredeveld T . Disagreement on the gain sharing method in supply chain collaborations. Russian Management Journal 16 (4): 537–562.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/spbu18.2018.404
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15361
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Due to a constantly growing competition among organizations and higher customer expectations,
  in the course of the last decades companies started to realize the need for supply
  chain collaboration (SCC). However, setting up a coalition is often challenging for collaborative
  parties. One major challenge for the implementation and success of a collaboration is
  a fair allocation method, which is accepted by and satisfies all collaborative parties. Although
  researchers already outlined the importance of the parties’ acceptance of the gain sharing
  method, until now the actual acceptance levels of gain sharing methods have not been investigated.
  This paper fills this gap by investigating the acceptance levels of selected gain
  sharing methods in vertical three-echelon SCCs in the Dutch fast moving consumer goods
  (FMCG) industry. In addition, the influence of behavioural decision-making aspects on the acceptance
  of allocation methods is observed in order to explain the cause of the acceptance
  or rejection of the gain sharing method. Results indicate that the acceptance of a gain sharing
  method depends on the information availability and cognitive biases. Furthermore, due
  to a different influence of available information and varying cognitive biases, no allocation
  method is accepted by all collaborative parties. Practical implications include to provide each
  party individually all relevant information to increase the parties’ acceptance and to apply
  debiasing techniques to make the decisions more predictable.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Russian Management Journal;Volume 16; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: supply chain collaboration
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: gain sharing
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: behavioural decision-making
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Disagreement on the Gain Sharing Method in Supply Chain Collaborations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 04-Jung.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15361/1/04-Jung.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 2,34 MB