title: Аutonomous State as a Political Category and Tool of Strategic Presence
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Dudin, Pavel N.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-05-26T12:24:07Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-05-26T12:24:07Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Dudin P. N. Аutonomous State as a Political Category and Tool of Strategic Presence. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 2020, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 40–57.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2020.103
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17868
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article attempts to derive the definition of an autonomous state and a set of its key features
  (characteristics) proceeding from existing foreign and domestic scientific materials. Although
  such a category is not present in wide political discourse, the existence of states (or state-like
  entities) with an autonomous status is still a reality that requires a scientific assessment. The
  relevance of the stated problems is due to the historical events that took place in the region
  of East Asia in the first half of the twentieth century. And for objective or subjective reasons,
  they require scientific and social rethinking. One of these events is the role and importance
  of Mongolia (then — Outer Mongolia / Mongolian People’s Republic) in the events preceding
  and accompanying the Second World War and the Great Patriotic War. Another event may be
  the creation of an “alternative” Mongol state in the occupied territories of Northern China by
  the Japanese military command. And if the current state of international relations in the region
  allows us to argue that the military presence of powers that are unfriendly to Russia in East Asia
  is not expected in the expected future, then we cannot speak with the same confidence about
  other instruments of strategic presence, including so-called “soft power.” That is why studying
  the experience of building a regional political order is an important task, to the solution of which
  the scientific community must also be connected.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Federal Property Fund in
  the framework of the scientific project No. 19-09-00502 “Institutions of the Russian / Soviet strategic
  presence in East Asia in the 20th century”.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Political Expertise: POLITEX;Volume 16; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: autonomy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: state
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Europe
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: East Asia
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: China
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Mongolia
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: international relations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: strategic presence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Аutonomous State as a Political Category and Tool of Strategic Presence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 40-57.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17868/1/40-57.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 710,53 kB