title: A SPECULATIVE MEDIUM: THE MATERIAL DIMENSION OF THE INTERPRETIVE EXPERIENCE IN GADAMER’S HERMENEUTIC PHILOSOPHY
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: INISHEV, ILYA
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-07-07T21:38:18Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-07-07T21:38:18Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: INISHEV Ι. A SPECULATIVE MEDIUM: THE MATERIAL DIMENSION OF THE INTERPRETIVE EXPERIENCE IN GADAMER’S HERMENEUTIC PHILOSOPHY. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2020, vol. 9, issue 1, pp. 44–68.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-1-44-68
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/18563
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Key innovation of phenomenological, or philosophical hermeneutics is the treatment of ‘understanding’
  not as an operation with symbols and meanings but as an activation of the specific experiential
  forms, including correlative affective and bodily potentials as well as respective ‘aggregate states’ of the
  material-perceptual environment. In this regard, understanding is a kind of transposition from one
  material and bodily configuration into another. In each case, configuration is comprised of ‘subjective’
  (experience) and ‘objective’ (milieu) components. But while ‘subjective’ side of ‘hermeneutic phenomenon
  (‘hermeneutic event’) is elaborated by Gadamer relatively detailed (for example, “theory of hermeneutic
  experience” makes up the central—systemic—part of Truth and Method), dynamics of the
  ‘objective’ side (and first of all, of its material dimension) is just indicated by the use of the vivid metaphors
  (for example, “fusion of horizons” or “increase in being”) or by description of everyday material
  practices in which ‘microphysics’ of transformative dynamics of ambient environments is implicated
  but not discussed overtly, as, for example, in case of Gadamer’s references to architecture, décor, and
  gestures. The problem here is that the ‘strong’ treatment of the transformative potential of hermeneutic
  experience presupposes the strong transformation affecting not only interpreter’s consciousness but
  also materiality of his body and ambient environments. The elements of such a ‘strong’ treatment of
  transformative potential of understanding, we find in Gadamer’s conception of the speculative schematically
  presented in the two concluding sections of his Truth and Method.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 9; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: speculative medium
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: transubstantiation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: materiality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: mediality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: perceptual faith
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: A SPECULATIVE MEDIUM: THE MATERIAL DIMENSION OF THE INTERPRETIVE EXPERIENCE IN GADAMER’S HERMENEUTIC PHILOSOPHY
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 44-68.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/18563/1/44-68.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 686,73 kB