title: U. S. climate institutions and the intelligence community: Domestic and international collaboration
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Yarygin, Grigory O.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-01-31T18:03:08Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-01-31T18:03:08Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Yarygin G. O. U. S. climate institutions and the intelligence community: Domestic and international collaboration. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 2021, vol. 14, issue 4, pp. 432–445. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2021.404
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2021.404
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38940
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Climate change presents an actorless threat. The most powerful world jurisdictions are undertaking
  efforts to tackle this global threat multiplier. The Biden-Harris administration, returning
  the U. S. back to international climate politics, claims the leadership role. The author of
  the article examines how the administration’s climate rhetoric is backed up organizationally.
  The institutional architecture that powers Biden’s climate policy is put at the center of the article’s
  analysis. The United States intelligence community has been entrusted with a significant
  role in running current U. S. institutional climate recovery efforts. The article approaches the
  engagement of the intelligence community in climate policy from such angles as policymakers’
  expectations of the intelligence community and its role and capabilities for domestic and
  international collaboration. The article proceeds through three stages. The first stage presents
  theoretical frameworks for new-institutional analysis approaches to climate policy of the
  United States. The second examines how the Biden-Harris administration organizes institutions
  in the system of climate policy. The third approaches the role and functions of the U. S.
  intelligence community in climate change prevention policy. The author concludes that the
  U. S. intelligence community possesses a strong capacity to provide for responsible decision
  making in regard to the climate, however, mechanisms for domestic and international climate
  intelligence exchange have yet to be determined.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. International Relations;Volume 14; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: USA
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: new institutionalism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Biden-Harris administration
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: intelligence community
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: climate change policy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: U. S. climate institutions and the intelligence community: Domestic and international collaboration
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 04.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/38940/1/04.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 639,98 kB