title: Intangible Cultural Heritage in architecture and urban planning
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Chapagain, Neel Kamal
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-12-10T20:08:30Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-12-10T20:08:30Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Chapagain, Neel Kamal. 2020. Intangible Cultural Heritage in architecture and urban planning. Pravovedenie 64 (1): 35–46.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.103
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33836
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This article reflects several observations of our cities during the COVID-19 pandemic — particularly
  the initial lockdown that most parts of the world experienced since March 2020. One of
  the impacts of COVID-19 has been the forced closeness of people with their homes wherever
  they were. In the present age, perhaps, many of us have rarely experienced our own homes or
  shelters or architecture so closely. The pandemic may have brought us an extended moment
  to experience and reflect on architecture and urban planning on a very personal scale — from
  a room, to an apartment or a house, a neighbourhood, and then perhaps a city on a limited
  scale. This is an interesting moment in history to reflect on architecture and space, and how
  they are designed and planned. COVID-19 has exposed the limitations of many of our thoughts
  and practices. Apart from the author’s own self-reflections at “home”, observations include
  the context of South Asian cities where the globally accepted measure of lockdown to prevent
  the spread of COVID-19 triggered the plight of millions of migrants on the momentarily empty
  roads and highways for a long-march towards rural and semi-urban segments of countries. This
  led to the author’s re-thinking of architecture and planning in urban contexts. In (re)thinking
  architecture and urban planning, the article uses the notion of intangible cultural heritage (ICH)
  as espoused by the 2003 UNESCO Convention, and discusses whether ICH could offer useful
  insights to achieve better results in our contemporary architecture and urban planning thinking
  and practice. Can the ICH perspective help us to understand these bitter realities of the 21st
  century? The author attempts to reflect on some of the questions.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 64; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: COVID-19
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: intangible cultural heritage
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Kathmandu Valley
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: world heritage
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: architecture and urban planning
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: UNESCO
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Intangible Cultural Heritage in architecture and urban planning
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 35-46.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/33836/1/35-46.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 616,99 kB