title: V. I. Lenin and empiriocritics about matter. Is the discussion over?
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Antonov, Alexey V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-09-03T17:09:59Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-09-03T17:09:59Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Antonov A. V. V. I. Lenin and empiriocritics about matter. Is the discussion over? Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2021, vol. 37, issue 1, pp. 16–29.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.102
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33032
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The problem of matter in philosophy has become relevant again. Nowadays, it does not resemble
  the crisis of the early XX century when a so-called “dissolution” of the matter in mathematical
  formulae was discussed. However, the emergence of term “dark matter” in physics,
  which is not clear how it differs from the well-known “light matter”, is obscure and raises the
  question of the “matter doubling”. This makes one remember that the current definition of
  matter in philosophy was developed as a result of a discussion concerning the ways of its existence
  between Vladimir Lenin and empiriocritics. Thus, all modern attempts to define matter
  cannot exist without a new view on the old discussion presented in the book “Materialism and
  Empirio-Criticism” by Lenin. The author of the article pays attention to the fact that during
  the discussion of “the main question of philosophy” a century ago, concerning the attitude of
  matter towards consciousness, it was considered by Lenin only in two aspects, specifically, ontological
  and gnoseological. At the same time, the principle of the identity of dialectics, logic
  and theory of knowledge proposed by him demands consideration of the arguments adduced
  in the discussion as well as the logical aspect. According to the author, the consecutive consideration
  of the main question of philosophy by means of logic, should result in a correction of
  Lenin’s definition of matter.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 37; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Lenin
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: empiriocritics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: main question of philosophy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: matter
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: dialectics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: logic
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: V. I. Lenin and empiriocritics about matter. Is the discussion over?
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 16-29.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/33032/1/16-29.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 708,25 kB