title: Mead and Husserl on the Self and identification of the subject
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Krioukov, Alexei N.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2017-12-17T11:19:50Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2017-12-17T11:19:50Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2017-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Krioukov A. N. Mead and Husserl on the Self and identification of the subject. Vestnik SPbSU. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2017, vol. 33, issue 4, pp. 477–489.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.409
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/8778
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Out of many different strategies in the philosophy of the early 20th century the author compares
  two completely different philosophies: G. H. Mead’s social behaviorism and E. Husserl’s transcendental
  phenomenology with respect to the self-arising problem. For Mead, the initial point of his theory is
  the social conduct or person’s behavior, whereas for Husserl, the life of the isolated transcendental
  Ego is of greatest value. The author emphasizes, though the main ideas of both philosophers have
  different methodological grounds, one finds, that the matter of primary importance for them. This is
  the question of who is an executor of the social acts (Mead) and the transcendental phenomenological
  act (Husserl)? Through an analysis of the main ideas of both philosophers (‘I’ and ‘Me’ as principles
  of the subject by Mead, and intentionality, time analysis, and intersubjectivity by Husserl) the author
  demonstrates, firstly, how the question of self-identity is solved in both conceptions, and, secondly,
  how to argue the advantages of phenomenology. The article leads to the conclusion: methodologically
  Mead’s social behaviorism is relativistic, as far as his theory of subjectivity depends on the social
  context. Husserl’s method, despite its complexity, offers a clear subject structure and therefore can be
  regarded as more productive for the theory of self. Refs 15.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 33; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Mead
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Husserl
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: transcendental Idealism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: behaviorism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: phenomenology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Ego
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: intersubjectivity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: philosophy of language
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: self
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Mead and Husserl on the Self and identification of the subject
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 09-Krioukov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/8778/1/09-Krioukov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 662,71 kB