title: The member states’ contributions to NATO’s policy in Afghanistan during Donald Trump presidency
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Boguslavskaya, Yulia
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-05-29T12:48:26Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-05-29T12:48:26Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Boguslavskaya Yu. The member states’ contributions to NATO’s policy in Afghanistan during Donald Trump presidency. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 2019, vol. 12, issue 1, pp. 40–57.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu06.2019.103
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15589
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In a currently highly competitive international environment, US goals of consolidating and strengthening NATO as well as bringing its present mission in Afghanistan to successful termination gain in significance. The success of these processes enhances the reputation of the United States as a powerful international actor. I checked the hypothesis that facing sharp critique from the United States president for free riding in NATO, those members who fail to meet the target of 2 per cent of GDP in their defense expenditure would choose to increase significantly their contributions to the Alliance’s efforts in Afghanistan. I did not find enough convincing empirical data to prove it. The contributions of allies rather reflect their power potentials and ambitions they pursue by cooperating in NATO framework. US allies remain able to define the scale of their contribution to collective efforts in NATO framework despite the US pressure. Broadening of the Alliance’s purview after the end of the Cold war provided member states with additional alternatives for choosing types of their involvement. My findings generally support the established view on intra-alliance bargaining process in scholarly literature. A wide range of missions in NATO framework and beyond it facilitates coalition formation for the United States with their numerous allies and partners. At the same time, if more major allies further choose to cooperate with Washington outside NATO, it will undermine its effectiveness and global role.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. International Relations;Volume 12; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: NATO
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: United States
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Afghanistan
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: alliance
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: politics of prestige
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The member states’ contributions to NATO’s policy in Afghanistan during Donald Trump presidency
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 40-57.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15589/1/40-57.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 642,61 kB