title: Presidential republics in Eastern Europe — distinctive features of formation after the Cold War
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Tkachenko, Stanislav L.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2018-10-24T16:11:11Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2018-10-24T16:11:11Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Tkachenko S. L. Presidential republics in Eastern Europe — distinctive features of formation after the Cold War. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 2018, vol. 11, issue 3, pp. 305–318.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu06.2018.306
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15008
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article deals with the formation of political systems in states, which have emerged in Eastern
  Europe after the Cold War. It emphasises that the majority of states in the region made
  a choice in favour of presidential republics. The author have arrived at the conclusion that
  characterization of institute of presidentialism in a state under consideration as ‘authoritarian’,
  ‘hybrid’ or ‘democratic’ to a great extent depends on two factors: scope of constitutional authority
  of a president as well as practice of interpretation of this authority in concrete actions
  in political domain. Both factors could be under the influence of multiple processes, which include
  nature of the mutual interaction of institute of presidential power with three traditional
  branches of power in a sovereign state; a practice of relationship with civil society structures,
  business communities and media; historical experience and its interpretation in the concrete
  historical scenery. Last but not least nature of the political regime in a state and place of an
  institute of presidential power in it could be defined by personality of a politician, who hold
  the office of president, his or her education, political experience, communication skills, ability
  to communicate with representatives of other institutions of state power.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. International Relations;Volume 11; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: presidentialism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: hybrid regime
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Democratic transit
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Eastern Europe
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Commonwealth of Independent States
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Presidential republics in Eastern Europe — distinctive features of formation after the Cold War
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 06-Tkachenko.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15008/1/06-Tkachenko.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 628,02 kB