title: Historical and philosophical grotesque/nonsense: Scientific Communism
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Sokolov, Evgenie G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-10-06T13:44:44Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-10-06T13:44:44Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Sokolov E. G. Historical and philosophical grotesque/nonsense: Scientific Communism. Philosophy of the History of Philosophy, 2022, vol. 3, рр. 401–423. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu34.2022.126 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu34.2022.126
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44134
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article demonstrates how Scientific Communism, an ideological construct of the
  last three decades of the Soviet period of national history, can be interpreted from
  philosophical positions. The historical and philosophical concept of G. W. F. Hegel is
  taken as the starting point of the study, on the basis of which a scientific and academic
  version of the historical evolution of philosophical thought was formed, which
  has a paradigmatic status in the historical and philosophical discourse. However,
  later on, the tendency to expand the horizons of philosophical competence began
  to manifest itself clearly by including systems that, according to formal and substantive
  characteristics, do not meet Hegelian disciplinary criteria, and therefore can
  be qualified as marginal. This will allow us to assert that the historical evolution
  of philosophical thought is diverse in essence and cannot be theoretically monological,
  because it includes various forms of philosophizing, as well as discursivethematic
  contents. Scientific Communism is precisely such a marginal zone, whose
  philosophical potential can be fully manifested only when the perspective of research
  interpretation is shifted. The dominant attitude among researchers of humanities to
  ideology, a characteristic example of which is Scientific Communism, is based on
  the opinion of K. Marx, who considered it, ideology, an illusory and perverse form
  of reflection of the world, distorting reality. However, if we follow the installation of
  D. de Tracy, thanks to which ideology was articulated as an autonomous and socially
  significant cognitive practice, then the real task of ideology is precisely to form a
  worldview adequate to reality. Of course, ideology, according to D. de Tracy, will gain
  a positive effect, as well as philosophical and conceptual persuasiveness, only when
  mastering the entire complex of paideutical disciplines, such as Grammar, Logic and
  Ethics. In the case of Scientific Communism, such complexes accompanying and legitimizing
  each other were dialectical and historical materialism, political economy
  and the history of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The article is written in
  memory of Akat Kalistratovich Belykh, Doctor of Philosophy, the first and only head
  of the Department of Scientific Communism (1962–1992) of the Faculty of Philosophy
  of the Leningrad Order of Lenin and the Order of the Red Banner of Labor of
  the A. A. Zhdanov State University.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The reported study was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  (project no. 20-011-00144 “Theoretical heritage of philosophy in Leningrad-Petersburg.
  The second half of the twentieth century”).
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Philosophy of the History of Philosophy;Volume 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: history of philosophy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: paradigm
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: marginality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ideology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Scientific Communism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: G. W. F. Hegel
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: D. de Tracy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: K. Marx
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Historical and philosophical grotesque/nonsense: Scientific Communism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 401-423.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/44134/1/401-423.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 689,24 kB