title: Topical issues of international responsibility in the light of the fight against coronavirus
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Moshnikov, Daniil K.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-10-20T21:04:55Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-10-20T21:04:55Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Moshnikov, Daniil K. 2022. Topical issues of international responsibility in the light of the fight against coronavirus. Pravovedenie 66 (1): 101–121. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2022.106 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2022.106
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38322
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The COVID-19 pandemic caused unprecedented damages for contemporary society. Unfortunately,
  international regulations have not been effective enough to minimize harm, however,
  academics and state representatives widely speculate on claiming compensation from the responsible
  state. The paper examines whether grounds for international responsibility exist. In order to achieve thorough results, research is divided into three parts. Firstly, the obligations
  of States are analyzed through the prism of international responsibility law. Secondly, the possibility
  of claiming the WHO responsible as the main international organization in the field is
  assessed. The analysis indicates that the critical problem with claiming compensation from any
  State is the lack of particular obligation owed to injured states. The scope of contemporary regulations
  is limited to the duty to notify WHO. Therefore, the general focus of the third part of the
  paper is on the shifted from attempts to claim responsibility, to arguments in favor of development
  and perfection of regulations. The last part of the research also focuses on ways to reform
  regulations on combating infectious diseases to clarify possible responsibility in the future. The
  analysis indicates that emphasis on responsibility is not sufficient for defining effective ways to
  combat diseases and provides methodological ways for further research in this area.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 66; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: сoronavirus
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: international law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: World Health Organization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: International Health Regulations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: infectious diseases
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: communicable diseases
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: COVID-19
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: pandemic
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: international responsibility
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Topical issues of international responsibility in the light of the fight against coronavirus
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 06.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/38322/1/06.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 757,24 kB