title: Topos of philosophy
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Shentseva, Elena A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2018-04-05T10:50:55Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2018-04-05T10:50:55Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Shentseva E. A. Topos of philosophy. Vestnik SPbSU. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2018, vol. 34, issue 1, pp. 57–68.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.106
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/9351
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article considers the topos of philosophy in the context of the research interest in the
  theoretical possibilities of topological thinking. For topological discourse, the spatial characteristics of being have no less value than temporal ones. The idea of length, materiality,
  eliminated from philosophy, becomes relevant only in the 1970s and ‘80s. through sociological
  research (primarily in the framework of the actor-network theory). This process
  contributed to overcoming the dichotomy of a cognizing subject a passive object. Foremost,
  topos of philosophy are described starting from the values embedded in the Aristotelian
  concept of topos, which presupposes movement, aspiration “to one’s own place.” No less important
  for the author is the analysis of the meaningful connotations of topos of philosophy
  with A. Lefebvre’s concept of space production and M. Heidegger’s notion of ethos. Finally,
  the topos of philosophy is considered through the appeal to the key concept of J. Lo’s methodology,
  namely Hinterland as well as to his idea of topologically multiple objects. Special
  attention is given to the concept of having “fluid edges” object and to that type of spatiality,
  which is defined through the concept of variability. The article’s topological interpretation
  of philosophy permits opposing the classical categorical couple place and place filling, the
  process of simultaneous, mutually conditioned production of space (space) and objects.
  Interpreted in this way, the topos of philosophy appears as a multiple object (a polyphonic
  structure) existing as intersections of various spaces.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научного
  проекта № 16-06-00087 «Социальная сеть: топологическая интерпретация социальной реальности».
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 34; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: philosophy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: topos
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: topos of philosophy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: topology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: space
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ethos
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: hinterland
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: topologically multiple object
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Topos of philosophy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 06-Shentseva.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/9351/1/06-Shentseva.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 628,09 kB