title: Post-prison resocialization — myth or reality?
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Romashov, Roman A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Bryleva, Elena A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-12-13T20:11:23Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-12-13T20:11:23Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Romashov, Roman A., Bryleva, Elena A. 2019. “Post-prison resocialization — myth or reality?” Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 4: 827–835.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.414
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16878
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In this article, the authors draw attention to the consistently high growth of recidivism among
  those who returned from prison. The reasons for this are insufficiently effective re-socialization
  activities, while the authors point out that the activities of the Federal Penitentiary
  Service in prisons during the prison period are currently the most streamlined both in terms
  of regulatory legal support and in technical and legal terms. The main problems arise for
  convicts upon returning from prison, which is associated with the loss of social ties; difficulties
  in finding a job, while the state represented by authorized bodies and officials, in fact,
  distances itself from the process of post-prison resocialization. The authors in the process of
  the study point out the following issues that need to be resolved both at the legislative and
  administrative levels: the formation of common approaches in defining the concept of “resocialization”,
  “probation”, as well as in developing common requirements and standards in the
  field of post-prison resocialization. The authors conclude the need for an integrated approach
  to the re-socialization of convicts with the involvement of civil society institutions and refer
  to the historical past of the Russian Empire, in particular, patronage societies that are quite
  effective at that time. The authors have noted positive examples of concrete practical assistance
  to people who have returned from places of detention, in particular such organizations are the
  Center for the Promotion of Criminal Justice Reform.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law;Volume 10; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: resocialization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: convicts
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Federal Penitentiary Service
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: state
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: civil society
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: societies patronage
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Post-prison resocialization — myth or reality?
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 827-835.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16878/1/827-835.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 609,16 kB