title: HUSSERL’S CONTEXTUALIST THEORY OF TRUTH
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: MAROSAN, BENCE PETER
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-07-08T09:52:47Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-07-08T09:52:47Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: MAROSAN B. P. HUSSERL’S CONTEXTUALIST THEORY OF TRUTH. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2020, vol. 9, issue 1, pp. 162–183.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-1-162-183
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/18573
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This article draws attention to certain features of Edmund Husserl’s theory of evidence and truth which,
  on closer look, reveal how his thoughts on the nature of experience and cognition are current and
  relevant even in the early 21st century. Many of his contemporaries and subsequent authors considered
  Husserl to be a late representative of traditional, modernist metaphysics—an idealist, a foundationalist,
  and an intellectualist, etc. The publication of his vast unpublished manuscripts has evidently dispelled
  such charges, and a thorough and attentive perusal of his published works (or works prepared for
  publication) clearly shows how highly problematic such charges were. In the article I aim to highlight
  the contextualist character of Husserl’s understanding of evidence and truth, of knowledge and Being.
  Every insight and every entity in his thought fits into a wider context of further experiences, insights,
  and entities. This conception is manifest at every level of his experience and knowledge: (1) everyday
  experiences, (2) scientific and (3) philosophical cognition. The evidence at every level is fundamentally
  open and contextual, and their correlation constitutes an essentially organic reality. With such
  formulations Husserl says something quite similar to what is now found under the label ‘epistemic
  contextualism’ in contemporary analytic philosophy. Next to the contextual character of evidence, the
  second main thesis of my essay is that Husserl’s stance in this question might serve as a fruitful field of
  dialogue between phenomenology and analytic philosophy.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: This paper was supported by the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of
  Sciences (project: BO/00421/18/2).
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 9; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Edmund Husserl
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: non-foundationalism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: contextualism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: evidence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: apodicticity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: truth
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: phenomenological metaphysics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: HUSSERL’S CONTEXTUALIST THEORY OF TRUTH
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 162-183.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/18573/1/162-183.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 674,32 kB