title: LEXICAL AND SEMANTIC CONSTRAINS AND AFFORDANCES OF SMELL NOMINATION AND DESCRIPTION IN RUSSIAN AND GERMAN LANGUAGES IN PERFUME DISCOURSE
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Stepanov, Evgenii S.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-10-24T16:13:48Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-10-24T16:13:48Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2024
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2782-1943.2023.27
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/47831
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This article examines the specificity of nominations and descriptions within
  the concept of smell. It analyses perfume reviews from the Russian perfume
  discourse and their translations in German, as presented on the Fragrantica
  website. The study aims to reveal how the concept of smell is expressed in
  discourse, taking into account lexical-semantic constraints and affordances.
  The following tasks were performed: analysis of the main features of perfume
  discourse and the text type ‘perfume review’; study of the possibilities and
  limitations of describing smells; description of the structure and mechanism
  of the concept of ‘smell’ in discourse; analysis of the particle characteristics of
  the odorem corpus and their descriptors; identification of the main groups of
  vocabulary used in perfume discourse. The study uses critical multimodal discourse
  analysis to interpret communicative practices and reveal deep meanings
  and complex structures within multimodal embedding. The concept of
  smell has several affordances and constraints, including the nomination of
  denotates resulting in substantives with a limited number and stable lexical
  composition. As human attention is primarily focused on evaluating smells,
  the concept of smell is often described using a limited lexicon. There is no
  unique vocabulary to describe smells, so descriptions are formed through synaesthetic
  and metaphorical transfer from other sensory areas.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Synergy of Languages & Cultures 2023: Interdiscipilinary Studies;
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: perfume discourse
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: perfume review
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: concept of smell
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: smell nomination
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: descriptive component of the concept of smell
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: LEXICAL AND SEMANTIC CONSTRAINS AND AFFORDANCES OF SMELL NOMINATION AND DESCRIPTION IN RUSSIAN AND GERMAN LANGUAGES IN PERFUME DISCOURSE
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 313-324.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/47831/1/313-324.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 1,78 MB