title: THE ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMACY OF RUSSIAN FIRMS: CONTEXTUAL SPECIFICITY AND LEGITIMIZATION STRATEGIES
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Panibratov, Andrei Yu.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Rysakova, Liana E.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-12-09T18:50:23Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-12-09T18:50:23Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Panibratov A. Yu., Rysakova 2020 L. E. The organizational legitimacy of Russian firms: Contextual specificity and legitimatization strategies. Russian Management Journal 18 (3): 289–312.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2020.301
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/21415
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Russian firms suffer from the negative country of origin effect and legitimacy shortage. This
  paper has the aim to reveal factors for Russian firms to focus on while build legitimacy both at
  home and abroad. To identify the existing research directions, the 48 articles applying legitimacy and Russian focus from journals in management and business for all years were analyzed,
  using both the bibliometric analysis and manual in-depth study of papers. Based on the
  specificity of the Russian context and literature analysis about the factors of the legitimacy
  concept, we develop a theoretical framework that is supported by a set of propositions about
  possible legitimization strategies of Russian firms. Three main pillars of the organizational legitimacy construct such as moral, pragmatic and cognitive, which are accepted as the most
  influential ones, were introduced and proposed for Russian firms how to gain them at home
  and abroad. This paper has the value for both theory and practice. It contributes to the legitimacy literature, responding to many calls to study the microfoundations of the organizational
  legitimacy and developing the holistic theoretical framework within the Russian context. The
  findings also are of practical importance for managers and entrepreneurs whose attention is
  paid to the effective strategic management and legitimacy building both at home and abroad.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Russian Management Journal;Volume 18; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: liability of foreignness
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: liability of outsidership
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: organizational legitimacy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: moral legitimacy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: pragmatic legitimacy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: cognitive legitimacy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russia
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: THE ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMACY OF RUSSIAN FIRMS: CONTEXTUAL SPECIFICITY AND LEGITIMIZATION STRATEGIES
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 289-312.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/21415/1/289-312.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 590,34 kB