title: Karl Marx and problem of humanism
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Dudnik, Sergei I.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2018-12-21T13:56:15Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2018-12-21T13:56:15Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Dudnik S. I. Karl Marx and problem of humanism. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2018, vol. 34, issue 4, pp. 462–473.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/spbu17.2018.401
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15187
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In the article there is considered relationship of Marx’s philosophy with a humanity problem
  as it arises in post-war Western European philosophy. The Marxist tradition separates at this
  time on scientism (L. Althusser, M. Godelier, etc.), proclaiming that the original Marxism represents
  scientific anti-humanism, and the humanistic tradition (J. P. Sartre, E. Fromm, etc.)
  seeking for the sake of maintaining classical humanism to unite Marxism with other ideological
  currents, for example, with existentialism. It is shown that the French neohegelianism,
  especially works of Alexander Kojeve who put forward and proved interpretation of philosophy
  of Hegel from the point of view of existentialism, played a key role in formation of humanistic
  tradition of Marxism. The antropologization of dialectic thinking within which the place
  of Spirit of Hegelian philosophy is occupied by the person realizing the freedom in the history becomes the main line of this new interpretation. The Vietnamese Marxist philosopher Tran-
  Duc-Thao convinced Alexander Kojeve that his anthropological interpretation of dialectics
  actually coincides in the main features with philosophy of Marxism. After a while Alexander
  Kojeve’s interpretation was adopted by many western Marxists setting the task of recovery of
  “authentic0Ф Marxism. Treating Marx’s humanism as aspiration to emancipate the person
  from the power of the capital, neomarxists considered this emancipation the major task not
  only of philosophy, but also of revolutionary practice. Within a humanistic current in Marxism
  this subject gained hypertrophied value as any question, both theoretical, and practical,
  was considered from the point of view of as far as it is a consequence of the capitalist project
  of exploitation.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 34; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Karl Marx
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Marxism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: humanism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: humanistic Marxism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: alienation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: freedom
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Karl Marx and problem of humanism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 01-Dudnik.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15187/1/01-Dudnik.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 637,41 kB