title: Correlation of translation and interpretation of legal terms in comparative legal studies of criminal proceedings
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Tarasov, Alexander A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-03-29T17:41:06Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-03-29T17:41:06Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2024-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Tarasov, Alexander A. 2024. “Correlation of translation and interpretation of legal terms in comparative legal studies of criminal proceedings”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 1: 49–66. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.104 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.104
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/45199
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Comparative legal methods have always been actively used in a significant part of scientific
  research into the problems of criminal proceedings. Currently, comparative criminal procedure
  has become especially in demand due to the need for constant international exchange
  of legislative and law enforcement experience. Under these conditions, the requirements for
  the quality of comparative studies themselves are increasing. Today in science it is customary
  to use legislative sources exclusively in the original language, and in a comparative analysis
  of the wording of legal regulations to compare not only their general legal meaning, but also
  specific original terms in their contextual environment. A comprehensive legal and linguistic
  analysis of legislative formulations from different national legal systems allows us to identify
  new meanings in compared laws, evaluate the effectiveness of legal regulation of similar social relations in different states, and consciously borrow or reject foreign legislative experience.
  Based on the analysis of comparative criminal procedural studies available in the domestic literature,
  the author argues that identified inaccuracies in the translation and interpretation of
  specific foreign language legislative terms often lead researchers to a distorted understanding
  and reproduction of the meaning of foreign legislation, to erroneous conclusions and assessments
  based on the results of its comparison with Russian legal provisions, to unproductive
  attempts to “squeeze” legal phenomena familiar to Russian and Russian-speaking lawyers into
  foreign legal frameworks. In this context, some problems of the theory and practice of the
  Russian criminal process are considered: the participation of an expert and specialist in the
  case, the witness immunity of a lawyer as a holder of professional secrets, the procedure for
  his interrogation, the role of a lawyer and the bar in the administration of justice. Based on a
  comparison of similar legal phenomena in different states of the continental European legal
  family, directions for finding solutions to existing problems are proposed.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 15; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: criminal process
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: criminal proceedings
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: witness immunity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: witness
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: expert
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: specialist
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: attorney-client privilege
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: lawyer
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: defense attorney
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: justice
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Correlation of translation and interpretation of legal terms in comparative legal studies of criminal proceedings
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 49-66.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/45199/1/49-66.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 713,65 kB