title: Post-, trans-, hyper-sin
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Sokolov, Boris G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2018-09-13T16:22:48Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2018-09-13T16:22:48Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Sokolov B. G. Post-, trans-, hyper-sin. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2018, vol. 34, issue 3, pp. 429–440.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.310
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/14820
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article dedicated to the problem of sin and sinfulness, and the person’s status in contemporary
  culture. For achieving this goal the author provides the comparative analysis of the two
  cultural contexts in relation to the problem of sin, namely, of the contemporary media space
  of the Internet and the religious situation of the 19th century. Based on the understanding of
  the sinfulness of the Danish philosopher S. Kierkegaard for who a sin is ontological and the
  underlying characteristics of a person in constant “dialogue” with God, the author makes the
  comparison to how the sin is treated in modern media space from social media to the message
  of Pope addressed to journalists. In contrast to the cultural situation of the nineteenth
  century, which was condensed in the understanding of sin in Kierkegaard’s religious philosophy,
  the modern secular world of the Internet and media zones use the term of sin not as an
  ontological marker, but only as a metaphor, a rhetorical figure. This metaphor has no significant
  existential and ontological status in comparison with the understanding of sin in the age
  of Kierkegaard. Modern understanding of sin is not comparable to the sensations, spiritual
  experiences, and suffering religious thinker of the nineteenth century forms a consciousness
  of a modern man, deprived of essential imperatives. Modern man does not know of any true
  sin, does not see pain, suffering, hunger, i.e., deprived of the most important existential orientations
  that have shaped a spirituality of a man until the mid 20th century. Accordingly, the
  modern model of the assembly of human consciousness is radically different from how was
  created a religious traditionalist consciousness for which sin, suffering, pain, and death were
  deep existential imperatives.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 34; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sin
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sinfulness
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: contemporary culture
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Søren Kierkegaard
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Post-, trans-, hyper-sin
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 10-Sokolov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/14820/1/10-Sokolov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 628,97 kB