title: Contesting of normative legal acts in court: Procedure de lege lata and ways of improving
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Yarkov, Vladimir V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Spitsin, Igor N.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2018-12-18T16:22:33Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2018-12-18T16:22:33Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Yarkov, Vladimir V., Spitsin, Igor N. 2018. “Contesting of normative legal acts in court: Procedure de lege lata and ways of improving”. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Law 4: 554–567.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/spbu14.2018.407
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15151
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article is devoted to the analysis of judicial contesting of normative acts in civil procedure,
  its types, nature and correlation. There are two types of judicial contesting of normative acts in
  Russia — abstract and casual. First of them is implemented in administrative justice, second
  is in civil and administrative justice. Abstract judicial contesting of normative acts should be
  considered as a universal mechanism for checking the legality of the normative act, implemented
  in administrative justice proceedings. On the contrary, casual contesting of normative
  acts is exercised both in administrative and civil judicial proceedings and is essentially part of
  the procedure for the court to choose the rule of positive law to be applied in a particular case,
  the direct subject of which is not the verification of the legitimacy of the normative act. The
  competence of the courts, in any case, to assess the normative act for its compliance with the
  normative act of greater legal force lies not so much in the key of judicial contesting of normative acts, as in the sphere of implementation of judicial discretion in the choice of applicable
  law. The authors criticize the abstract type of judicial contesting of normative acts in relation
  to the limitation of the range of its objects to the limits of the operation of the normative act
  in time. In accordance with the principles of civil and administrative justice, the authors argue
  that normative acts that have lost their force at the time of application to the court should
  relate to the objects of judicial contestation.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 9; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: judicial contesting of normative acts
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: administrative judicial proceedings
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: civil procedure
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: access to justice
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Contesting of normative legal acts in court: Procedure de lege lata and ways of improving
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 07-Yarkov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15151/1/07-Yarkov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 634,1 kB