title: Legal instruments of approximation for national legal systems in the context of civil procedure law
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Branovitskii, Konstantin L.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-02-12T11:56:04Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-02-12T11:56:04Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Branovitskii, Konstantin L. 2018. Legal instruments of approximation for national legal systems in the context of civil procedure law. Pravovedenie 62 (4): 606–624.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2018.402
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17089
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article offers an overview of the legal instruments existing in the world for approximation of
  civil procedure law, and also defines the basic concepts in this area (approximation, harmonization,
  unification). The author analyzes in detail the advantages and disadvantages of each instrument
  of convergence, and also presents examples of their use (tools) that are available today.
  The spectrum of legal instruments for the approximation of law makes it possible to trace in the
  historical perspective the development of the convergence process (from the reception of Roman
  law to the Principles of the Transnational Civil Procedure in 2004). Such diversity allows us to see
  how flexible this process can be, depending on the goals of rapprochement proclaimed by states,
  international organizations, and research teams. Flexibility is also given to the process by its object
  — the law in its social understanding, as well as by taking into account the economic, social
  and cultural components of the participating states of the convergence process. The focus on
  civil procedure law is related to the principle of forum shopping in the international civil process on
  the one hand and the inadmissibility of large-scale competition of legal (judicial) systems within
  the framework of integration associations, on the other. A study of modern integration processes
  shows that such phenomena as the growth of the domestic market and the proclamation of freedom
  of movement of services and capital, one way or another, lead to a convergence of civil
  procedure law of the respective states. Restriction of domestic trade is unacceptable due to the
  very different legal norms and rules of access to justice. Comparable provisions of the procedural
  legislation of individual member states of the integration association on the protection of rights
  and legitimate interests in civil proceedings are no less important than the comparable substantive
  law. The existing experience of European integration, in which the removal of barriers in the
  judicial protection of the rights of citizens and organizations, ensuring the real accessibility of
  justice for all members of the integration association, have become the basic and initial elements
  of building a integrated legal space, is a clear confirmation of this. Analysis of the advantages and
  disadvantages of various legal instruments for rapprochement, as well as the inclusion of civil
  procedure law in the list of areas of rapprochement, should be included in the current agenda of
  Eurasian integration. It should be emphasized that today in domestic procedural science there
  is almost no discussion on the issue of an adequate model for approximating the legal systems
  of the EAEU member states, on the advantages and disadvantages of the legal instruments for
  approximation proposed in the constituent documents. This state of affairs only increases the
  importance of scientific research in this area, built on the basis of a comparative legal approach,
  as well as a broad scientific and practical discussion of emerging problems.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 62; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: approximation of law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: civil procedure law approximation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: legal instruments of approximation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: coordinated legislation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: reception (transplantation) of law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: international treaty
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: model law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Legal instruments of approximation for national legal systems in the context of civil procedure law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 606-624.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17089/1/606-624.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 655,25 kB