title: Public biased urban philosopher. Should philosophy be only urban (philosophy of the city)?
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Bojanić, Petar
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2017-07-04T13:36:37Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2017-07-04T13:36:37Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2017-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Bojanić Petar. Public biased urban philosopher. Should philosophy be only urban (philosophy of the city)? Vestnik SPbSU. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2017, vol. 33, issue 1, pp. 4–13.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/ spbu17.2017.101
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/6625
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This article is a reflection on the purpose of the modern philosopher deployed in the horizon of the
  question: Should philosophy only be urban? Communication between the public-biased philosopher
  and urban philosophy is established by theming the concept of habitat. Analyzing the the habitat
  concept in the philosophy of M. Heidegger and E. Levinas, the author concludes, that the reduction
  of dwelling to proximity, kinship, neighborhood, gathering is insufficient. Nor is dwelling is a joint
  action. While the man lives surrounded by others he needs distance for existence, thinking, writing and memory. Following Ph. Lacoue-Labarthe and J. Derrida, the author claims that passive resistance
  leads to the deconstruction of the habitat concept by transforming what is internal and external,
  private and one’s own. He offers to re-think the ethics of the philosophical bias. The public philosopher
  who dwells in the city and takes care of the common cause, keeping distance from the others, should
  have the determination to determine himself as “we”. His new form of dwelling and speaking has yet
  to be established. Refs 14.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 33; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Public philosopher
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: biased dwelling
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: philosophy of the city
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: M. Heidegger
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: E. Levinas
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Ph. Lacoue-Labarthe
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: J. Derrida
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Public biased urban philosopher. Should philosophy be only urban (philosophy of the city)?
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 01-Boyanin.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/6625/1/01-Boyanin.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 523,09 kB