title: An empirical analysis of criminal sanctions against exam cheating in China
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Li, Lifeng
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-07-12T14:52:23Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-07-12T14:52:23Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2024-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Li L. 2024. An empirical analysis of criminal sanctions against exam cheating in China. Pravovedenie 68 (2): 202–212. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2024.205
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2024.205
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/45755
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In order to ensure the sustainability of the national examination system, which is the basis of
  social mobility, China has added new criminal sanctions for Exam Cheating in the criminal law
  amendment in 2015, and issued the latest judicial interpretation in 2019. However, through the
  analysis of the relevant judicial application data from 2015 to 2019 by SPSS, it is found that there
  is still a certain gap between the latest judicial interpretation and the actual problems. To a large
  extent, the judicial interpretation in 2019 solved the problems of the scope of the crimes of exam
  cheating and clarified its boundary with other related crimes. However, it does not contain detailed
  provisions on “serious circumstances”, which will certainly affect the original purpose of
  legal regulation laid down by the legislator to prevent illegal acts and formulate lawful behavior.
  Through the empirical research on such crimes, this article argues that the functions of criminal
  law in shaping the moral and behavior standard could give full play only by revising the penalty
  standards through later judicial interpretation. Such measures are extremely necessary and will
  achieve the goal that the legislator pursued when introducing liability for cheating.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 68; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: China’s National Examination System
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Criminal law Amendment
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: exam cheating
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: judicial interpretation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: An empirical analysis of criminal sanctions against exam cheating in China
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 05_Ли.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/45755/1/05_%d0%9b%d0%b8.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 811,98 kB