title: Turkisms in one of the early Russian translations of the 18th century
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Sokolov, Alexander I.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Malysheva, Irina A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-09-03T19:51:52Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-09-03T19:51:52Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Sokolov A. I., Malysheva I. A. Turkisms in one of the early Russian translations of the 18th century. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2021, 18 (1): 187–201.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2021.110
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33064
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article considers Turkic borrowings in the Russian language at the beginning of the 18th
  century. The material of the study was a translation of the 17th century treatise “The History
  of the Present State of the Ottoman Empire” written by the English diplomat Paul Ricaut
  and translated into a number of European languages. The Russian translation was done by
  P. A. Tolstoy from the Italian version in 1702–1714 and published as “The Turkish Monarchy”
  in 1741. The study presents the methods of phonetic (orthographic) and morphological adaptation
  of Turkisms by comparing a typographical manuscript for typesetting with edits (made
  in 1725) and the printed text. The article aims at comparing the usage of borrowings with
  their forms in the Italian version of the treatise and in the Polish translation since the latter, apparently, was used in the process of typographical editing of the Russian text. A number of
  distorted forms of Turkisms that appeared in the Russian “Monarchy” as a result of the mechanical
  transfer of typos from the Italian translation were revealed. It has been established
  that the translation of compound nouns identified in the Turkic languages as izafet constructions
  was mainly a copying of their forms from the Italian translation. Most of the Turkisms
  in “The Turkish Monarchy” are exoticisms, but likely relevant for the Russian reader of the
  18th century. Hence, the principles of including exoticisms in the “Dictionary of the Russian
  Language of the 18th Century” require clarification because a number of Turkisms denoting
  confessional concepts in modern Russian are part of active vocabulary.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 18; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russian historical lexicology and lexicography
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Turkisms
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Paul Ricaut
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: The Turkish Monarchy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Turkisms in one of the early Russian translations of the 18th century
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 187-201.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/33064/1/187-201.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 795,31 kB