title: Metapragmatics: When the author brings meaning and the addressee context
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Chernyavskaya, Valeria E.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-05-07T10:34:06Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-05-07T10:34:06Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Chernyavskaya V. E. Metapragmatics: When the author brings meaning and the addressee context. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2020, 17 (1): 135–147.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2020.109
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17538
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The present article is formulated against the background of a theory of metapragmatics
  that studies how the effects of language usage are objects of discourse analyses. The notion
  of metapragmatics is discussed as it follows from approaches by Jacobson, Silverstein, Verschueren,
  Spitzmüller and is in line with modern approaches in intercultural sociolinguistics.
  Metapragmatics focuses on the reflexive metacommunicative effects of linguistic choices in
  discourse. Metapragmatic reflexivity is behind the meaning construction and linguistic choice
  when considering language in use. As a point of departure in analyzing the meaning making
  processes is the presumption, that meaning derives from social situation. The focus is placed
  on the notion of social sharing. Semantisation and contextualization are discussed as connected
  but sometimes divergent processes. The present paper aims to prove that understanding
  is the result of proper contextualization in which utterances are made to fit a particular
  context. Context change, or incorrect contextualization, can cause communicative conflicts
  and misunderstandings. Thus this paper has two central notions of context and contextualization
  to discuss the processes of meaning making within social practice. The theoretical and
  methodological framework under discussion is exemplified on a modern Russian sociocultural
  practice. The social effects of misunderstandings through context change are considered.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The research is supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 18-18-00442 “The mechanisms
  of meaning formation and textualization in social narrative and performative discourses and practices”
  at Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 17; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: metapragmatics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: language in society
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: context
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: contextualization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Metapragmatics: When the author brings meaning and the addressee context
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 135-147.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17538/1/135-147.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 649,02 kB