title: HUMAN BIOMATERIAL AS A LEGAL OBJECT
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Vasiliev, Gennady S.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-03-04T11:48:26Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-03-04T11:48:26Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Vasiliev G. S. 2018 HUMAN BIOMATERIAL AS A LEGAL OBJECT. Pravovedenie 62 (2): 308–361.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu25.2018.205
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17135
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article deals with the issues related to the rights to the examination of human biomaterial
  after its separation from the human body. Biological samples are already recognized
  as legal objects in other countries, and they are subjects to the regime of property rights.
  In Russia, some private references to rights to examination biomaterial can also be explained
  if only it is recognized as property and ownership object. As a rule, the rights to
  such object belongs to the medical (scientific) organization, in which it was separated from the donor’s body. In the majority of cases, according to the current legislation, it is
  referred to things that are used freely. Two generally recognized limitations of this ownership
  right, namely, the need to obtain informed voluntary consent of the donor, as well as
  the right to the protection of personal data of the donor, are investigated. It is concluded
  that it is currently inappropriate to adopt a special federal law on these relations since
  in Russia public relations about the biomaterial are just beginning to take shape. It is
  desirable to publish explanations of the Supreme Court or the Ministry of health (as an
  authorized body of executive power in the field of medicine). Such an act would combine
  the achievements of law science and practice, but would remain an act of interpretation
  and did not entrust the legislator with responsibility for inevitable errors. This would leave
  room for their proper correction in the future.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: Статья подготовлена в рамках выполнения проекта НИР СПбГУ «Разработка
  концепции правового регулирования и этических стандартов оборота биоматериалов
  для генетических исследований, а также генетической информации»
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 62; Issue 2 (337)
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: legal objects
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: property rights
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: a biological sample
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: biomaterial
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: genetic information
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: personal data
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: a human body
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: HUMAN BIOMATERIAL AS A LEGAL OBJECT
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 308-361.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17135/1/308-361.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 839,92 kB