title: Quasi-synonymy of Danish causal conjunctions from the speaker’s perspective
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Nikulicheva, Dina
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-08-17T18:08:35Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-08-17T18:08:35Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Nikulicheva D. Quasi-synonymy of Danish causal conjunctions from the speaker’s perspective. Scandinavian Philology, 2021, vol. 19, issue 1, pp. 42–60.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu21.2021.103
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/32757
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article explores a fragment of the grammatical system of the Danish language,
  which represents a regular formal variation of auxiliary language markers — causal
  conjunctions fordi, for, eftersom, thi. The functional and pragmatic description of each
  of them is proposed based on the anthropocentric approach. This approach is aimed
  at studying the linguistic expression of the speaker’s orientation in denotative reality
  and communication. In terms of expressing causation, this presupposes differentiation
  of ways to substantiate the speaker’s assertion, depending on different sources of
  causation: the speaker’s own inference (for); appeal to knowledge, common to all
  participants in communication (thi); justifying one objective fact with another (fordi),
  justifying the speaker’s own inference with an objective fact (eftersom). The etymology
  of conjunctions, as well as the temporal correlation of the predicates in causal and main
  clauses, allows us to determine the reasons for the speaker to organize the mental space
  of causation in different ways. In addition, the use of the conceptual blending concept
  allows us to explain why one conjunction is replaced by another in oral speech.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: With support from the Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research (RFFR),
  grant no. 19-012-00146.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Scandinavian Philology;Volume 19; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Danish language
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: anthropocentric approach
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: causal conjunctions
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: quasisynonymy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: causal and main clause
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sources of causation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: mental space of causation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Quasi-synonymy of Danish causal conjunctions from the speaker’s perspective
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 42-60.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/32757/1/42-60.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 813,43 kB