title: Discourse analysis of an interview about the Bulgarian Pomak wedding ceremony
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Balashevich, Diana Dmitrievna
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-02-05T13:45:34Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-02-05T13:45:34Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Balashevich D. D. Discourse analysis of an interview about the Bulgarian Pomak wedding ceremony. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2019, 16 (4): 538–556.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2019.401
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16993
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The material of the article is a transcribed interview recording about a wedding ceremony of
  the middle of the 20th c. with an informant born in 1932, identifying herself as Pomak (Bulgarians-
  Muslims) and is a native speaker of the Smoljan subdialect of the Bulgarian Rhodope
  dialect. The relevance of the work is due to the increasing interest of modern humanities to religious
  minorities and the necessity of developing the most effective methods of field linguistics
  (based on the dialect material that is quickly disappearing due to social reasons) as well as
  the novelty of the original material. The article depicts cases of disclosure of information when
  there are no questions by using the question “what is called y+z?” or the question “do you have
  a lexeme x?,” by using a clarifying question, or by the question of repeated inquiry; the most
  frequent one turned out to be “what is called y+z?.” The article also considers the cases of categorical
  denial of the information proposed in the question, the lack of memories, the cases of
  a detailed answer or a one-word answer. The most effective questions are “do you have y+z?”
  and the question of repeated inquiry, resulting in the highest number of positive responses.
  Due to the dialectic nature of the narrative, the number of questions “do you have a lexeme x?”
  that aim at concretizing the meaning of a lexeme given by the interviewer was minimal, as the
  informant mentioned the marked lexis himself without any question being asked.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The work was started with the support of grant RSF No. 14-18-01405 “From separation to symbiosis:
  languages and cultures of Southeast Europe in contact” and completed with the support of grant RSF No. 19-
  18-00244 “Balkan bilingualism in dominant and equilibrium contact situations in diatopy, diachrony and
  diastration.”
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 16; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: discourse analysis
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: role of the question in narrative
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: interviewing methods
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: language code of the wedding ceremony
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Pomaks
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Discourse analysis of an interview about the Bulgarian Pomak wedding ceremony
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 538-556.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16993/1/538-556.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 755,18 kB