title: The LSU Department of Classics in the Pre-War and Post-War Period
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Skvortsov, Artyom M.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-10-06T14:49:48Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-10-06T14:49:48Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Skvortsov A. M. The LSU Department of Classics in the Pre-War and Post-War Period. Philologia Classica 2022, 17 (1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2021.113 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2021.113
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38254
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This article analyzes the history of the Department of Classical Philology at Leningrad University
  from 1938 to 1946, except when the department was evacuated to Saratov during the
  Blockade of Leningrad. Documentation from the archival collections (the Central State Archive
  of St. Petersburg and the Joint Archive of St. Petersburg State University) and memoirs
  (mainly those of O. M. Freidenberg) were used. The study of the curriculum of the department,
  introduced in 1938, allowed us to draw a conclusion about the comprehensive historical-
  philological training of students, which had its roots in the pre-revolutionary times. It has
  been established that the policy of the head of the department, O. M. Freidenberg, of promoting
  young personnel in the department (with the handover of courses to them, not always
  rationally justified, in the main department) contributed to a conflict situation which led to
  a public discussion in May 1946 at the academic council of the department she headed. This
  meeting should not be categorized as an ideological campaign: it was based on professional
  disagreement. The scandalous nature of B. L. Galerkina’s and N. V. Vulich’s defense was due not
  so much to personal motives as to scientific differences in the views on the tasks of classical philology between O. M. Freidenberg and representatives of the “old” school. Dissertations
  turned out to be hastily done, the reason for which was the material factor.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Philologia Classica;Volume 17; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: history of classical philology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: department of Classical Philology of Leningrad State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: higher education in the USSR
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Philological Faculty of Leningrad State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The LSU Department of Classics in the Pre-War and Post-War Period
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 14146-Текст статьи-46481-1-10-20220805.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/38254/1/14146-%d0%a2%d0%b5%d0%ba%d1%81%d1%82%20%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b0%d1%82%d1%8c%d0%b8-46481-1-10-20220805.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 725,33 kB