title: “Concept Synthesis” test for intelligence research: Qualitative analysis and conceptual commentaries
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Shcherbakova, Olga V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Makarova, Daria N.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Nikiforova, Elizaveta A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2017-08-25T09:42:53Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2017-08-25T09:42:53Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2017-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Shcherbakova O. V., Makarova D. N., Nikiforova E. A. “Concept Synthesis” test for intelligence research: Qualitative analysis and conceptual commentaries. Vestnik SPbSU. Psychology and Education, 2017, vol. 7. issue 2, pp. 128–136.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu16.2017.202
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/7119
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: “Concept Synthesis” test (by M. A. Kholodnaya) was suggested within an ontological approach to intelligence
  studies as an alternative tool for measuring intellectual abilities. The aim of this paper is
  to summarize our experience of using this test as well as to provide some conceptual commentaries
  on the original criteria developed for rating the answers. We compiled a database of 924 answers for
  “Concept Synthesis” test, collected from 2013 to 2015 in three different studies (all together, 104 participants)
  and rated in accordance with the original criteria. All the answers underwent a thorough
  qualitative analysis and were re-rated independently by three experts. The updated criteria for assessing
  the answers were suggested as a result of this work. We also provide conceptual commentaries on
  more than 40 particular answers and discuss the most common technical issues emerging while using
  “Concept Synthesis” test. Refs 19. Table 1.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Psychology and Education;Volume 7; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: intelligence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: intelligence measurement
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: conceptual abilities
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: “Concept Synthesis” test
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: “Concept Synthesis” test for intelligence research: Qualitative analysis and conceptual commentaries
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 03-Shcherbakova.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/7119/1/03-Shcherbakova.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 639,21 kB