title: Mediatization of cognitive terms: A corpus study
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kulikova, Valentina A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-08-27T19:54:09Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-08-27T19:54:09Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2024-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Kulikova V. A. (2024). Mediatization of cognitive terms: A corpus study. Media Linguistics, 11 (2), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2024.201 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2024.201
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/47364
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The problem of mediatization of cognitive terms in modern Russian socio-political media
  is considered. The study examines various approaches to the mediatization studies, which is
  comprehended at various levels: as a social process, discursive process, as well as the resulting
  transformation of lexemes in media texts. Thus, the mediatization of terms is considered
  as a consequence of global social and discursive processes, manifested in the semantic and pragmatic transformations of terms in the media. The object of the study is 22 terms that
  are relevant in scientific discourse and denote cognitive processes and phenomena, as well
  as approaches to their study. The functioning of the terms was studied on the material of
  6704 contexts in the newspaper subcorpus of the National Corpus of the Russian Language.
  The aim of the study is to compare the semantics, pragmatic functions of cognitive terms in
  the media and scientific discourses, to identify factors that influence the features of mediatization
  of terms. To achieve this aim, N-grams, the frequency of use in media and scientific
  discourses were studied using the corpus statistics. The use of terms in the concordance lists
  of the NCRL were studied with semantic, contextual analysis. The semantics of terms in media
  texts is compared with the semantics in scientific discourse according to specialized dictionaries
  of cognitive terms. Discursive, pragmatic features of these lexemes are also analyzed to
  identify atypical functions, expressive contexts of use. As a result, the terms are divided into
  4 groups depending on the characteristics of their use in media texts and the mediatization
  specific: 1) terms that are not mediatized; 2) terms with wider semantics in the media discourse;
  3) terms that have differential semes in comparison with scientific discourse; 4) terms
  that function in non-standard combinations, expressive contexts.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Media Linguistics;Volume 11; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: mediatization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: terminology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: terminology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: cognitive science
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: media discourse
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Mediatization of cognitive terms: A corpus study
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 01.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/47364/1/01.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 674,52 kB