title: Epistemic origins of neo-scholastic interpretation of ontological proof of divine existence and discussions сoncerning ontologism
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Savinov, Rodion V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-11-08T10:07:22Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-11-08T10:07:22Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Savinov R. V. Epistemic origins of neo-scholastic interpretation of ontological proof of divine existence and discussions сoncerning ontologism. Issues of Theology, 2019, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 334–347.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: http://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2019.303
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16551
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article discusses the problem of the foundation of the development and evaluation
  of ontological (aprioristic) proof of Divine existence in some traditions in
  the philosophy of the 19th century such as Ontologism and Neo-Scholasticism.
  The history of the development of this argument in the tradition of the Middle
  Ages and Early Modern period illustrates that at its foundation is the belief in
  the possibility of direct (obvious, evidential) apprehension of certain metaphysical
  principles that relate to the Divine existence, and their formal (aprioristic)
  demonstration. Thus, the difference in meaning of the possibility of explicating
  these principles (and recognition or non-recognition of this epistemological possibility)
  founded differences in evaluation of ontological proof. It has been shown
  that scholasticism, in the end, rejected this opportunity and was highly critical
  and negatively interpretated this kind of proof, while some modern thinkers have
  recognized this opportunity and included this proof in their philosophical theology
  (Descartes, Leibniz and other). We analyzed the teaching of A. Rosmini,
  V. Gioberti, and С. Ubags, that returned to the ontological proof, based on the
  Modern European philosophy, and they considered ontological proof as the basis
  of all philosophical and theological thinking. The Neo-Scholastic and Neo-
  Thomism traditions were then studied: Th.-М. Zigliara, J. Kleitgen, G. Sanseverino,
  and J. Franzelin who argued against the ontological proof and proposed
  epistemic arguments related to the non-evidentialistic interpretation of knowledge
  and the disclosure of internal mediating mechanisms of cognitive activity.
  In conclusion, despite the predominantly metaphysical and theological basis of
  the discussion, it took place within the framework of the discussion of epistemic
  models, and this is important for the history of the theory of knowledge and history
  of the formation of Neo-Thomism, which (through F. Brentano, a witness of
  these discussions) is associated with several schools of contemporary philosophy.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Issues of Theology;Volume 1; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Neo-Scholasticism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Neo-Thomism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Ontologism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: epistemology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: proof of the Divine existence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: knowledge
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: thinking
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Epistemic origins of neo-scholastic interpretation of ontological proof of divine existence and discussions сoncerning ontologism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 334-347.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16551/1/334-347.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 662,98 kB