title: Competence and PCC approach: opportunities and limitations
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Tolochek, Vladimir A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-07-19T11:06:31Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-07-19T11:06:31Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Tolochek V. A. Competence and PCC approach: opportunities and limitations. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2019, vol. 9, issue 2, pp. 123–137.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2019.202
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16001
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The methodology and descriptions of professionally important qualities (PECs) of the subjects of activity (conventionally called the “PWC approach”) and competencies (the “competence approach”) are presented. It is stated that it is not constructive to resolve questions about phenomena understood as “professionally important qualities” (PEC) and “competencies” when compared as components of the binary opposition (… or … or). A constructive solution can be the restoration of a whole series (continuum) of genetic transformations of the phenomenon (s), in different scientific traditions defined as “PWC”, “competence”, “abilities” (general, special, professional), etc. Both paradigms have their own capabilities and limitations. The PWC approach as a scientific paradigm is characterized by the following: extreme broad generalizations; often, the substitution of measurements and monitoring of the evolution of the STC by “judgments of common sense”; latently postulated preservation of the ICC throughout the subject’s professional life, etc. “Spontaneous opposition” to the basic principles of the ICC approach appears as a set of different, inconsistent and inconsistent points of view. K-approach as a scientific paradigm is characterized by: pragmatism of initial goals and objectives; empiricism; often the substitution of the scientific study of phenomena by the generalization of the opinions of expert practitioners; extensive approach to the study of competencies; solving issues of joint activities is presented through the expansion of the subject’s competence sets; insufficient attention to the development prospects of the qualities of the subject, his personal and professional development in the continuation of his career. The “spontaneous opposition” more often declares itself as a reasoned alternative approach, as a critic of opponents and arguing the advantages of its approach.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The study was supported by Russian Foundation for Humanities, project “Comprehensive study of psychological and sociocultural factors of labor productivity in enterprises of the Perm Territory”, No. 18-413-590009.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Psychology;Volume 9; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: professionally important qualities
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: competencies
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: abilities
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: approaches
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: paradigms
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: opportunities and limitations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Competence and PCC approach: opportunities and limitations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 123-137.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16001/1/123-137.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 649,48 kB