title: TECHNO-TELEPATHY & SILENT SUBVOCAL SPEECH-RECOGNITION ROBOTICS: DO ANDROIDS READ OF ELECTRIC THOUGHTS?
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: BROWER, VIRGIL W.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-06-23T11:30:51Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-06-23T11:30:51Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: BROWER V. W. TECHNO-TELEPATHY & SILENT SUBVOCAL SPEECH-RECOGNITION ROBOTICS: DO ANDROIDS READ OF ELECTRIC THOUGHTS? Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2021, vol. 10, issue 1, pp. 232–257.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2021-10-1-232-257
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/29542
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The primary focus of this project is the silent and subvocal speech-recognition interface unveiled in
  2018 as an ambulatory device wearable on the neck that detects a myoelectrical signature by electrodes
  worn on the surface of the face, throat, and neck. These emerge from an alleged “intending to speak”
  by the wearer silently-saying-something-to-oneself. This inner voice is believed to occur while one reads
  in silence or mentally talks to oneself. The artifice does not require spoken sounds, opening the mouth,
  or any explicit or external movement of the lips. The essay then considers such subvocal “speech” as a
  mode of writing or saying and the interior of the mouth or oral cavity as its writing surface. It briefly
  revisits discussions of telepathy to recontextualize Heidegger’s warning against enframing language
  exclusively within calculative technics and physiology, which he suggests is detrimental to Mundarten
  (mouth-modes of regional dialects). It closes in reconsideration of Husserl’s phenomenology of
  language and meaning in Ideas as it might apply to subvocal speech-recognition interfaces. It suggests
  ways by which the electrophysiology that the device detects and deciphers (as an alleged intention of a
  presumed natural language unspoken vocally or aloud) might supplement Husserl’s insinuation of the
  Leiblichkeit of language through a self-stamping extraction of an extension of meaning.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 10; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: intention
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: meaning
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: language
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: telepathy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: cybernetics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: logic
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: embodiment
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: orality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: TECHNO-TELEPATHY & SILENT SUBVOCAL SPEECH-RECOGNITION ROBOTICS: DO ANDROIDS READ OF ELECTRIC THOUGHTS?
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 232-257.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/29542/1/232-257.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 1,16 MB