title: Two psychologies: Specifics of research models
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Morozova, Svetlana V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Gorbunov, Ivan A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-12-17T13:31:56Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-12-17T13:31:56Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2024-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Morozova S. V., Gorbunov I. A. Two psychologies: Specifics of research models. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2024, vol. 14, issue 3, pp. 434–457. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2024.303 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2024.303
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/48151
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: A pressing problem in psychology is the quality of the application of mathematical methods
  in the practice of psychological research, which was one of the reasons for the emergence of
  a replication crisis. Also, recently many publications have appeared criticizing mathematical
  statistics in psychological research within the framework of critical psychology. In our opinion,
  the following factors play a key role in this problem: 1) the contradiction between the requirement
  for comprehensive research and the multiplicity of hypothesis testing; 2) the ability
  to put forward or adjust post-hoc hypotheses; 3) the training of psychologists in the field of
  mathematical statistics is significantly dependent on the exponential growth in the number of
  methods for the study of which limited time is given. Consequently, it is necessary to form lists
  of mathematical methods that are preferable in certain areas from the point of view of statistical
  practice, the origins of which lie in general methodological principles. The paper examines
  the problems of the methodology of applying mathematical methods in psychological articles
  from the point of view of the frequency and dynamics of their use, the dependence of the
  level of citations and other phenomena on them. It also examines a sample of articles in eight
  leading APA journals over the past 110 years that use the most current mathematical methods
  in psychology — 24,657 publications. The sample was obtained using queries to the Psyc-
  ARTICLES database. Using machine learning methods and automatic data processing, the
  raw results of search queries were corrected and validated. The work carried out on standardization
  and validation of data of this kind is the first example of work of this nature carried out
  in psychology. Based on the validated results obtained using structural equation modeling,
  two main factors in the use of mathematical methods were identified. Several alternative models
  are considered and compared.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Psychology;Volume 14; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: mathematical methods in psychology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: scientific publications
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: statistical practice
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: history of psychology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: prospects for psychology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: methodology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: model
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: disciplinarity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: disciplinarity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: branches of psychology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: APA
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Two psychologies: Specifics of research models
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 03.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/48151/1/03.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 1,94 MB