title: Discourse analysis of political judgments in the context of digitalization
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Ignatjeva, Olga A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-11-17T13:26:31Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-11-17T13:26:31Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Ignatjeva O. A. Discourse analysis of political judgments in the context of digitalization. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 2021, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 259–272.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2021.303
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33622
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Discourse analysis of texts and speeches has been one of the most popular research methods
  since the second half of the 20th century. Its emergence is associated with the works of postmodernists,
  such as G. Deleuze, J. Derrida, M. Foucault, E. Laclau, and Ch. Mouffe. The method
  is interesting because it allows us to take into account the context of expressed judgments and to
  uncover the implied meaning of statements. Despite the widespread use of this method, no unified
  methodology has been created. In foreign and Russian science, parallel trends and schools
  in the field of discourse analysis were formed, the most influential of which is discussed in this
  article. The emergence of social networks, digital platforms and applications has set a new trend
  in modifying and creating new variants of discourse analysis of texts and judgments, but already
  in a digital environment. Some of them, such as Y. G. Misnikov’s approach, can serve as an alternative
  to studying public opinion by means of a social survey. The purpose of this article is to
  analyze and systematize both traditional methods of discourse analysis of political judgments and
  new approaches using social networks, apps, websites, and digital platforms. In the course of the
  research, the methods of classification and systematization as well as, general scientific methods
  of analysis and synthesis were used. In the context of digitalization, five varieties of discourse
  analysis method were considered for text analysis in a digital environment: critical discourse analysis,
  corpus discourse analysis, mediated discourse analysis, multimodal discourse analysis, and
  discourse analysis using artificial intelligence. A thorough analysis of these methods allowed us to
  identify a gap in the analysis of political judgments on digital platforms of interaction between the
  government and the population, and to propose a variant of filling it on the basis of A. Kruglanski’s
  parametric model.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: This work was supported with a grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant
  no. 20-011-31361 “Outsourcing of Political Judgment: A Critical Analysis of the Information Paradigm
  of Network Public Communication”).
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Political Expertise: POLITEX;Volume 17; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: discourse analysis
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: critical discourse analysis
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: social media
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: mobile applications
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: neural networks
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: political judgments
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Discourse analysis of political judgments in the context of digitalization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 259-272.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/33622/1/259-272.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 680,19 kB