title: SICHÜBERLIEFERUNG: RE-MOVING THE HISTORY OF BEING AS PRESENCE
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: MURATA-SORACI, KIMIYO
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-06-22T16:43:35Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-06-22T16:43:35Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: MURATA-SORACI K. SICHÜBERLIEFERUNG: RE-MOVING THE HISTORY OF BEING AS PRESENCE. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2021, vol. 10, issue 1, pp. 61–76.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2021-10-1-61-76
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/29521
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: How are we to responsively belong to tradition? This paper retrieves the concept of self-tradition
  (Sichüberlieferung) in Heidegger’s magnum opus Being and Time (1927). We will take as a guiding
  light Heidegger’s designation of a mode of his phenomenology as “phenomenology of the inapparent”
  expressed in the 1973 Zähringen Seminar. We will pay special heed to the function of the middle voice,
  neutrality of Da-sein, and tautology in the question of Being and history and bring to light the relation
  between authentic temporality and authentic historicity in a tautological turning of the selfsame. We
  will make a remark on the delay of Da-sein’s authentic historicity in the light of the “self-tradition”
  which marks Heidegger’s non-metaphysical response to the heritage of metaphysics of presence. In
  the wake of the phenomenology of the inapparent, we will turn to Derrida’s 2008 text The Animal that
  Therefore I Am to explore Derrida’s different approach to free the “I am” from that of Heidegger’s Dasein
  whose being is set in Jeweilig-Jemeinigkeit. We will show how Derrida’s invention of animot enables
  him and us to speak with the voices of our non-human animal others and enables us to free ourselves
  from the fixities of presence of the present in our thought, language, and sensitivity. In a relay of the two
  philosophers’ reading of us and their ways of self-overcoming of man as rational animal, we will learn
  to be in question and to learn to relate to one another without reducing one to the other and other to
  the one.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 10; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: repetition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ek-sistence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ecstatic temporality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: authentic historicity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: self-tradition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the middle voice
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: tautology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: animot
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: SICHÜBERLIEFERUNG: RE-MOVING THE HISTORY OF BEING AS PRESENCE
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 61-76.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/29521/1/61-76.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 644,9 kB