title: NORM, ONTOLOGY, CONCEPTUAL SCHEME: NORMATIVE HEIDEGGERIANISM IN PHILOSOPHICAL AND HISTORICAL CONSIDERATION
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: ONEGIN, ILIA
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-06-27T19:07:20Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-06-27T19:07:20Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2024-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: ONEGIN I. NORM, ONTOLOGY, CONCEPTUAL SCHEME: NORMATIVE HEIDEGGERIANISM IN PHILOSOPHICAL AND HISTORICAL CONSIDERATION. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2024, vol. 13 issue 1, pp. 177–206.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2024-13-1-177-206
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/45631
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This article reconstructs the normative strategy of interpretation of Martin Heidegger’s Being and Time
  in modern analytical philosophy, and also proposes a theoretical framework for understanding this
  strategy as a historical phenomenon. The article describes the development of the normative direction
  in the interpretation of Heidegger’s fundamental ontology. Its first branch—the socio-normative, or
  the neopragmatist one—is associated with such philosophers as John Haugeland and Robert Brandom.
  The second one—the ethico-normative, or postneopragmatist one—branch is represented by Steven
  Crowell and Sacha Golob. It is shown that the first group of normativists focused mainly on implicit
  social norms and structures of conformity, while the second—focuses primarily on Kantian ethics and
  Christina Korsgaard’s interpretation of Kant, as well as on the inferentialist philosophy of language of
  Robert Brandom. The conceptual schemes used by each of the representatives of these approaches are
  reconstructed. The connections of different approaches within the framework of the normative direction
  with each other are shown. The concept of a relay race is proposed, which can describe normative
  Heideggerianism as a historical phenomenon. It is shown that the development of normative Heideggerianism
  can be characterized as theoretical progress in relation to the accuracy of the interpretation
  of Heidegger’s texts. The grounds for the comparative “progressiveness” of different normative
  approaches in the updates of the basic normative conceptual scheme that they involve are clarified. It
  is also shown that the progress of the normative conceptual scheme in the direction of flexibility and
  adaptation to Heidegger’s text is fraught with a loss of meaningfulness of the very concept of norm. It
  is argued that the concept of norm, despite the loss of its empirical content, can be used to translate
  Heidegger’s concepts for pragmatic reasons.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 13; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Martin Heidegger
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: normative interpretation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: neopragmatism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: norm
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: commitment
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: practical identity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: constitutive standard
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: relay race
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: conceptual scheme
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: NORM, ONTOLOGY, CONCEPTUAL SCHEME: NORMATIVE HEIDEGGERIANISM IN PHILOSOPHICAL AND HISTORICAL CONSIDERATION
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 09_Онегин-177-206.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/45631/1/09_%d0%9e%d0%bd%d0%b5%d0%b3%d0%b8%d0%bd-177-206.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 746,62 kB