title: Joseph de Maistre and Peter Chaadaev: Cultural transfer of Catholic ideas
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Pantina, Marina V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-12-19T16:33:25Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-12-19T16:33:25Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Pantina M. V. Joseph de Maistre and Peter Chaadaev: Cultural transfer of Catholic ideas. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2023, 20 (3): 567–578. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2023.310 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2023.310
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44526
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The influence of Joseph de Maistre on P. Chaadayev is a confirmed fact, though the textological
  analysis of his “Philosophical Letters” has not yet been carried out. The problematic aspect of the topic is the variety of interpretations of the thought of the Savoyard philosopher in Russia,
  which leads to the paradoxical possibility of reaching opposing conclusions based on the
  same works of de Maistre. He also inspired the conservative thinkers and Chaadayev, whose
  works were perceived by his contemporaries as opposing the theory of official nationality.
  The methodology used to investigate this problem is M. Espagne’s methodology of reception
  studies, which suggests the possibility of creating a new semantic meaning when an idea is
  perceived from a different cultural or political perspective. In this article, we focus on Chaadayev’s
  strategies in interpreting de Maistre’s thought and the significant differences that arise
  in adapting the Savoyard philosopher’s ideas for the readers of the “Philosophical Letters”. The
  novelty of the study lies in comparative analysis of the texts, which makes it possible to move
  away from stating the fact of borrowing to its specific use, characteristic of the author and
  the era when the work was written in Russia. With this approach, the focus of the study shifts
  to the recipient’s text and the perception of the Savoyard philosopher’s thoughts in a specific
  historical context.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The study was carried out within the framework of grant no. 21-78-10052 “From the Cadiz
  Constitution to the St. Petersburg Uprising: Transfer of Discourses, Ideas, Emotions in the Biedermeier Era”
  of the Russian Science Foundation, https://rscf.ru/project/21-78-10052/.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 20; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: history of reception
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: cultural transfer
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Catholicism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russian literature of the 19th century
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Joseph de Maistre and Peter Chaadaev: Cultural transfer of Catholic ideas
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 10.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/44526/1/10.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 650,41 kB