title: Mystical historiosophy of Velimir Khlebnikov
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Samylov, Oleg V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Simonenko, Tatiana I.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-11-14T13:04:26Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-11-14T13:04:26Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Samylov O. V., Simonenko T. I. Mystical historiosophy of Velimir Khlebnikov. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2019, vol. 35, issue 3, pp. 507–518.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.310
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16587
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In this article the mystical historiosophy of Velimir Khlebnikov is considered as a form of Russian
  historiosophical thought. Religious, philosophical, historical and cultural prerequisites
  of formation of the concept of historicism in Russian mysticism of the beginning of the 20th
  century are analyzed. Special attention is paid to “Boards of Fate”, a collection of notes and
  observations about the universal laws of time discovered by Khlebnikov. In the article general
  principles are formulated of assessment of both the mystical historiosophy of Khlebnikov, and
  other attempts of mystic-occult development of the principle of historicism. Progress in the
  humanities and cultural anthropology makes it easy to see the limitation of such attempts and
  to establish some of their initial attitudes, reproduced by default. When these attitudes remain
  ignored, mystical historicism not only is reproduced in this or that form again and again, but
  also naturally finds admirers. In particular, we consider the idea of “the universal myth” which
  for a long time was an attractive reference point for anthropology and for other humanities. Modern anthropological theories (for example, M. Godelye), see in such construction of the
  universal myth the reproduction of old speculative idealism in new forms of ethnology and
  psychoanalysis. As the current state of domestic culture is characterized by deviations from
  scientific and philosophical historicism (various versions of folk history, “new chronology” of
  A. Fomenko, conspiracy theories, etc.), analysis of sources of Russian mystical historicism acquires
  natural relevance. A conclusion is made about the need to study Russian historiosophical
  mysticism for deeper understanding of the principle of historicism and of peculiarities of
  its perception in Russia.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 35; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: history
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: historiosophy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: mysticism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: time
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: myth
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Mystical historiosophy of Velimir Khlebnikov
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 507-518.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16587/1/507-518.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 620 kB