title: The admissibility of improperly obtained evidence: The universality of the problem and the diversity of approaches to solving it
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Stepanov, Pavel P.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Besedin, Gleb E.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-12-16T15:59:49Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-12-16T15:59:49Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Stepanov, Pavel P., Besedin, Gleb E. 2019. The admissibility of improperly obtained evidence: The universality of the problem and the diversity of approaches to solving it. Pravovedenie 63 (3): 460–480.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2019.307
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33973
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article focuses on the issue of acknowledging inadmissible evidence obtained in violation
  of the law. According to the authors, this issue can be encountered, in one way or another, in
  any procedural system (both at the national and international levels). In this regard, the authors
  substantiate the relevance and ambivalence of the issue for the Russian criminal proceedings.
  Also, the authors use the scientific works of scholars belonging to the Soviet, early post-Soviet
  and modern periods of the development of Russian criminal proceedings, as well as materials
  of judicial practice from various years in order to demonstrate the evolution of approaches to
  the solution of the topic. In order to demonstrate universality of the issue, the authors analyze,
  in a comparative legal sense, the approaches of leading foreign procedural systems. It is concluded
  that there is a tendency that foreign legal systems are searching for the recognition criteria
  of evidence obtained in violation of the law to achieve a balance between the two areas of
  criminal procedural policy: ‘due process of law’ and ‘crime control’. Usually, the violation of human
  rights committed in obtaining evidence per se does not entail the finding of such evidence
  as unacceptable. The authors focus on the same issue, but in the scope of international criminal
  justice which combines the approaches of both the investigative (inquisitorial) and the accusatory
  (adversary) criminal procedure traditions. It is indicated that the bodies of international
  criminal justice (in particular, the International Criminal Court), when forming their position on
  the issue under consideration, are guided in many respects by the law enforcement practices of
  international bodies for the protection of human rights (primarily, the decisions of the European
  Court of Human Rights). The authors conclude that it is possible to use the criteria for the inadmissibility
  of evidence specified in the Rome Statute and the decisions of the European Court
  of Human Rights for Russian criminal proceedings due to the transitional nature of the criteria.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 63; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: evidence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: criminal proceedings
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: comparative research
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: independent source doctrine
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: inevitable discovery doctrine
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: inadmissible evidence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: due process of law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: crime control
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: inquisitorial tradition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: adversary tradition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The admissibility of improperly obtained evidence: The universality of the problem and the diversity of approaches to solving it
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 9850-Article Text-28113-1-10-20201203.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/33973/1/9850-Article%20Text-28113-1-10-20201203.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 794,31 kB