title: The court and the prosecutor’s powers in taking custodial measure through legal proceedings
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Ivanova, Olga G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2017-07-18T14:55:13Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2017-07-18T14:55:13Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2017-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Ivanova O. G. The court and the prosecutor’s powers in taking custodial measure through legal proceedings.Vestnik SPbSU. Law, 2017, vol. 8, issue 2, pp. 209–216.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu14.2017.207
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/6914
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This article is written to analyse court and prosecutor’s powers in applying a custodial measure, to
  observe the introduction of specialized (investigative) judges, to look at the possibilities of procedural
  law improvement in the sphere of custodial measures. In the given article the prosecutor’s powers in
  court hearing while applying custodial measure were examined. This work voices the opinion that
  since the court has a juridical control function during a pre-trial investigation, this function must be
  institutionalized and a corps of investigating judges must be formed. It is being explained the suggestion
  to commute a sentence with a primary applying as “1 month detention”. The article was also
  arrives at a conclusion that the prosecutor’s task in applying a measure of restraint in juridical procedure
  is the supervisory action over the criminal procedural law while applying a measure of restraint;
  however a prosecutor’s attitude can be developed only during the court hearing after both sides’ arguments
  and elements of claims will be heard. A prosecutor, through his overriding concern in applying
  a measure of restraint, lies under the obligation to take part in the trial discussing this question but he is not bound by an investigator’s opinion and has a right, if eligible, not to support his application. A
  prosecutor does not provide a criminal prosecution function in pre-trial criminal procedure. Refs 8.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 8; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: criminal prosecution
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: prosecutor
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: court
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: custodial measure
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: powers
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: commitment
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: house arrest
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: bail
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The court and the prosecutor’s powers in taking custodial measure through legal proceedings
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 07-Ivanova.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/6914/1/07-Ivanova.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 602,25 kB