title: Antiphon Tetralog. 3. 4. 3
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Takhtajan, Souren A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-01-17T11:06:06Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-01-17T11:06:06Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Souren A. Takhtajan. Antiphon Tetralog. 3. 4. 3. Philologia Classica 2018, 13(2), 303–307.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu20.2018.210
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15260
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This paper deals with the initial phrase of Tetralog. 3. 4. 3: κοινοῦ δὲ τοῦ τεκμηρίου ἡμῖν ὄντος
  τούτῳ τῷ παντὶ προέχομεν. Such is the text of the manuscripts. Some scholars have proposed
  emendations to it. Evidently, most of them were confused by the proximity of two datives,
  τούτῳ and τῷ παντί. Others have defended the text as it stands in the manuscripts. At the
  same time, nearly all have regarded the pronoun τούτῳ as masculine and separated it from the
  subsequent τῷ παντί: κοινοῦ δὲ τοῦ τεκμηρίου ἡμῖν ὄντος τούτῳ, τῷ παντὶ προέχομεν. I try
  to show that the correct interpretation, not involving change of the manuscript reading, was
  proposed long ago by Johann Reiske. He regarded τούτῳ as neuter and separated τούτῳ τῷ
  παντὶ προέχομεν from the previous part of the phrase: κοινοῦ δὲ τοῦ τεκμηρίου ἡμῖν ὄντος,
  τούτῳ τῷ παντὶ προέχομεν. This interpretation makes perfect sense. It adds weight to the end
  of the phrase (τούτῳ τῷ παντὶ προέχομεν versus τῷ παντὶ προέχομεν), as τούτῳ “with the help
  of the following argument” points to the reason for the superiority of the defense over the prosecution.
  If the pronoun τούτῳ is neuter, it is opposed to τοῦ τεκμηρίου. According to this interpretation,
  Antiphon opposes two kinds of arguments: those using inferential evidence (τοῦ
  τεκμηρίου) and those using direct evidence (τούτῳ). This opposition suits the author of the
  Tetralogies just fine. Eduard Maetzner adopted Reiske’s interpretation and demonstrated that
  two adjacent datives with different functions, such as τούτῳ τῷ παντί, are common in Greek.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Philologia Classica;Volume 13; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Antiphon
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Tetralogy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: interpretation of the Greek phrase
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Blass
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Süss
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Reiske
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Maetzner
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: arguments from probability
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: direct evidence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Antiphon Tetralog. 3. 4. 3
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 10-Takhtajan.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15260/1/10-Takhtajan.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 617,82 kB