title: The factors of terminology modernizing in journalism theory
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Korkonosenko, Sergey G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-12-04T11:40:15Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-12-04T11:40:15Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Korkonosenko, S. G. (2019). The factors of terminology modernizing in journalism theory. Media Linguistics, 6(3), 290–302.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2019.301
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16725
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article deals with the forming and modernizing the journalism theory terminological
  apparatus in the changing socio-cultural environment and technical and technological support
  of its functioning. Some scholars insist on the need for a radical revision of the theoretical
  concepts in journalism, which would greatly affect the lexical representation of scientific
  knowledge. The author considers the experience of compiling terminological dictionaries
  of journalism in Russia and abroad and notes the high activity in this area, mainly at the
  applied level. However, the task to publish the fundamental encyclopedic dictionary is still to
  be completed. It will only be possible if there is an adequate theoretical concept of modern
  journalism to rely on. The study analyzes recent publications, which assess the impact on the
  journalism theory and its terminology of two main factors, namely the trends in world science
  and the digital explosion in the media industry. Supporters of radical changes insist that due
  to these factors the theory of journalism should give way to the theory of media. Accordingly,
  the media would become an essential element in the terminology system. At the same time,
  authoritative foreign scientists write that the imaginary crisis of journalism is typical of some
  Western countries and that the idea to revise the theory is promoted by representatives of the
  Anglo-American school of communication studies. In other regions of the world, on the one
  hand, journalism is successfully developing, although changing in forms of functioning, on
  the other hand, the lexical diversity brought by different national cultures, enriches science
  more than terminological unification. The author also sees no reason to kill journalism theory
  with its stable terminology, which reflects the existing institutional and professional reality.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Media Linguistics;Volume 6; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: journalism theory
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: media theory
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: terminology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: modernization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: digitalization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The factors of terminology modernizing in journalism theory
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 290-302.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16725/1/290-302.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 699,89 kB