title: Dogmatic and political-legal justification of real obligations
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Savenkov, Aleksei V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-12-13T17:37:32Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-12-13T17:37:32Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Savenkov, Aleksei V. 2020. Dogmatic and political-legal justification of real obligations. Pravovedenie 64 (3): 352–372.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.303
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33879
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The development of Russian civil law allows us to conclude that such an institution of the general
  theory of civil law as real obligations (obligatio propter rem) is no stranger to domestic
  law. At the same time, the existence of some relevant legal rules in federal laws and the recent
  jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation allows us to confirm the conclusion.
  It demonstrates that there are more and more examples of real obligations in Russian law.
  Meanwhile, the possibility of the very existence of real obligations in Russian law remains a controversial
  issue in the Russian civil law doctrine. In the article, the author, raising the question of
  the permissibility of the existence of real obligations, systematically analyzes possible dogmatic
  and political-legal arguments, the answers to which make it possible to find the place of real obligations
  in the system of Russian civil law. At the beginning of the work, the author turns to the
  dogmatic grounds for substantiating real obligations. Thus, the author reveals the importance
  of the structure of the system of property law, the principles of numerus clausus and numerus
  apertus, the properties of following the law, and of the principle of privity of contract for the
  existence of the real obligations in the given legal order. In the second part of the article, the
  author tries to provide a political-legal justification for real obligations. The author compares the
  legal possibilities that are provided, on the one hand, by the use of real obligations in civil law
  transactions, and, on the other hand, by the use of limited real rights (for example, servitudes),
  legal restrictions on property rights and social norms (neighborly norms). In the final part of the
  article, the author summarizes the conclusions made in the article, coming mainly to the general
  conclusion that Russian private law does not contain serious dogmatic and political-legal
  preclusions to the existence of real obligations in the domestic legal order.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 64; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: real obligations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: obligatio propter rem
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: servitudes
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: neighborhood law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: property law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Dogmatic and political-legal justification of real obligations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 352-372.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/33879/1/352-372.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 746,22 kB