title: Peculiarities of television debates as a type of speech interaction
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Tymbay, Alexey A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-01-28T12:55:07Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-01-28T12:55:07Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Tymbay, A. A. (2018). Peculiarities of television debates as a type of speech interaction. Media Linguistics, 5 (2), 221–232.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/spbu22.2018.206
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15333
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article contains the analysis of basic communicative strategies employed by the participants
  of TV debates, a type of political discourse. The study was conducted using the videos of the
  Trump — Clinton debate during the 2016 US presidential campaign. The major principles of
  building of a political dialogue of this type were singled out by means of a linguistic analysis,
  showmanship, competiveness and personification which are the top characteristics of this
  type of discourse. The article illustrates different types of turn-taking, shows the difference
  between turns and backchannels, simple overlaps and deliberate interruptions of a partner.
  However, the choice of turn-taking type is not random. It depends on the strategic planning
  of the candidates, who view it as a means to project their personality as well as their political
  programme onto the audience. Thus, the dual nature of discourse is highlighted: a dialogue
  between the candidates and the dialogue with the audience. The communicative strategies
  chosen by the politicians are viewed by the author as a means of influencing the opponent and
  the electorate in general, one of them being denigrating the opponent with the aim to create
  a more beneficial personal profile. In the end, the author suggests using the conclusions made
  in teaching oratory and effective public speaking techniques to students.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Media Linguistics;Volume 5, no. 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: TV debates
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: political discourse
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: communicative role
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: speech strategies and tactics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Peculiarities of television debates as a type of speech interaction
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 06-Tymbay.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15333/1/06-Tymbay.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 624,24 kB