title: CRITIQUE OF IDEOLOGY IN GADAMER’S HERMENEUTICS AND HABERMAS’ CRITICAL THEORY
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: LAURUKHIN, ANDREI
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-07-07T21:48:10Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-07-07T21:48:10Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: LAURUKHIN A. CRITIQUE OF IDEOLOGY IN GADAMER’S HERMENEUTICS AND HABERMAS’ CRITICAL THEORY. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2020, vol. 9, issue 1, pp. 69–101.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-1-69-101
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/18564
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The subject of this article is the debate of Gadamer and Habermas about the nature of critical thinking,
  the relationship between freedom and authority, the individual and traditions, documented in
  the book Hermeneutics and Criticism of Ideology (1971). Central to the author is the question: “What
  understanding of critical thinking would allow us to gain a higher degree of resistance to ideology?”
  The author consistently solves several problems. First, the author clarifies the meaning and significance
  of the key concepts of “ideology” and “criticism” in the critical theory of Frankfurt School and philosophical
  hermeneutics. Thanks to these explanations, becomes clear the basis for the possibility of a
  productive polemic between philosophical hermeneutics and critical theory. Secondly, in the analysis
  of the main lines of criticism by Habermas against the hermeneutical project of Gadamer, the author
  explicates the strengths and weaknesses in the argumentation of the opposing parties. The focus here is
  the problem of the relationship of critical reflection with prejudice, authority and tradition, the problem
  of theoretical maturity and methodological support of hermeneutics, the problem of forming a
  basic consensus of understanding and interaction. Based on a comparative analysis of the arguments
  and counterarguments of Gadamer and Habermas, the author shows the non-trivial nature of critical
  thinking and reveals new aspects in understanding the concept of criticism of ideology. The result of
  the comparative analysis is the idea of an integrative concept of ideology criticism, which allows productive
  use of the strengths of the critical and hermeneutic approaches, and thereby provide a higher
  resistance to ideology at the collective and individual levels.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 9; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ideology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: criticism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: authority in cognition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: tradition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Habermas critical theory
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: integrative concept of ideology criticism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: CRITIQUE OF IDEOLOGY IN GADAMER’S HERMENEUTICS AND HABERMAS’ CRITICAL THEORY
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 69-101.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/18564/1/69-101.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 732,79 kB