title: The qualification of crimes and compliance with procedural law in one criminal case about embezzlement through abuse of authority: Expert opinion
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Shchepelkov, Vladislav F.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Stoyko, Nikolay G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2017-12-16T16:47:09Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2017-12-16T16:47:09Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2017-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Shchepelkov V. F., Stoyko N. G. The qualification of crimes and compliance with procedural law in one criminal case about embezzlement through abuse of authority: Expert opinion. Vestnik SPbSU. Law, 2017, vol. 8, issue 4, pp. 500–515.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu14.2017.411
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/8761
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Expert opinion examines harm to property of an organization through abuse of power by managing
  authorities at the conclusion of transactions. The authors use the approach of legal doctrine and judicial
  practice. Conclusions: (1) theft of entrusted property, when used in relation to the powers conferred
  upon the property is subject to qualification in accordance with Article 160 of the Criminal Code, rather
  than as fraud; (2) a business arrangement without competitive bidding, when it is obligatory, including
  there are other signs of abuse, may constitute an offence under Article 201 of the Criminal Code of the
  Russian Federation; (3) damage caused by the organization to shares belonging to the State cannot be
  regarded as damage caused to the State; (4) the qualification of the offence as grave in the absence of any
  reasoning means that bringing charges is illegal and groundlessness, and (5) the inadmissibility of the
  detention of the accused in custody based on the gravity of the offence alone. Refs 6.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 8; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: theft
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: abuse of power
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: embezzlement
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: fraud
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: damage
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: a resolution to bring charges
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: detention in custody
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The qualification of crimes and compliance with procedural law in one criminal case about embezzlement through abuse of authority: Expert opinion
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 11-Shchepelkov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/8761/1/11-Shchepelkov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 707,59 kB