title: The variety of evaluation in communicative practices of academic discourse
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Nefedov, Sergey T.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-03-01T11:36:01Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-03-01T11:36:01Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Nefedov S. T. The variety of evaluation in communicative practices of academic discourse. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2021, 18 (4): 760–778.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2021.408
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/35315
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article represents a discourse-analytical and corpus study of the evaluation of language as
  a pragmatic tool in the structure of the professional scientific activity of German linguists. The
  aim of the work consists in outlining the functional-communicative variety of the evaluation
  language, depending on the principal task of scientific research, scientific expert and scientific-
  educational communication practices. The scholarly relevance of the research rests on its
  incorporation into modern interdisciplinary studies of language resources from the aspect of
  linguistic pragmatics, interactional sociolinguistics and discourse linguistics, which are directed,
  on the whole, towards the study of the language and interpretation of the meaning of
  language signs within the framework of real social contexts while also taking into account a
  wide range of extralinguistic factors. The novelty of the research is evident in the following
  results: for the first time, the linguistic variety of evaluations dependent on the general aim of
  communication practice, which determines the axiological perspective, is considered; a disciplinary
  correlated classification of evaluation with the allocation of epistemic cognitive, expert
  and persuasive evaluation is proposed; the essential differences between the selected types of
  evaluation in the pragmatic categories of author-centricity, normo-centricity and addresseecentricity
  are substantiated; the text- and discourse-forming part played by language markers
  of the evaluation category of importance/relevance in profiling and promoting established
  knowledge in the process of teaching the fundamental theoretical disciplines is revealed. The
  research material was the German-language corpus of journal articles, scientific reviews and
  university textbooks on linguistics.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 18; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: evaluation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: academic discourse
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: epistemic cognitive evaluation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: expert evaluation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: persuasive evaluation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The variety of evaluation in communicative practices of academic discourse
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 760-778.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/35315/1/760-778.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 728,38 kB