title: Discrediting bullying in online dialogues (on the material of linguo expert practice)
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Chernyshova, Tatyana V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-11-15T09:22:51Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-11-15T09:22:51Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Chernyshova T. V. (2022). Discrediting bullying in online dialogues (on the material of linguo expert practice). Media Linguistics, 9 (3), 170–189. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2022.301 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2022.301
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38567
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This article presents the results of the study — discrediting cyberbullying in the polylogues of
  network communication. The purpose of the study is to describe the options for the formation of defamatory cyberbullying in network communication and to identify some of its typological
  features in comparison with conflicting texts of a defamatory orientation in the materials of
  traditional print media based on the material of controversial texts that became the object
  of litigation in 2019–2021. The study, conducted on the material of three types of aggressive
  verbal behavior of network communicators — SMS correspondence, chat in the WhatsApp
  messenger and personal correspondence in the same messenger, made it possible to clarify
  some typological features of cyberbullying varieties as a distinct social problem that requires
  discussion and search for solutions. A comparative analysis of public aggressive speech actions
  associated with an attempt to discredit an opponent in traditional media (media) and social
  messengers made it possible to identify their common and different features. The common
  features, united by the strategy and tactics of discrediting, include: purposeful and pre-planned
  choice of the victim, due to the situation of communication, goals, the implementation of
  which is pursued by discrediting or offensive actions; conventionally or legally fixed rules of
  speech behavior in public and private speech communication. The differences, in our opinion,
  are primarily due to the type of discourse (institutional, interpersonal or mixed), the form
  of language manifestation as a means of communication (written/printed, oral, electronic);
  addressee factor (the number of participants involved in a speech conflict or observing it); a
  set of linguistic and non-linguistic means selected for cyberbullying. We believe that modern
  mass media serve as a kind of standard for the selection of speech means of communication,
  not only in “real”, but also in modern virtual communication.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Media Linguistics;Volume 9; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: network space
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: traditional media
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: defamation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: defamatory cyberbullying
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Discrediting bullying in online dialogues (on the material of linguo expert practice)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 170-189.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/38567/1/170-189.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 767,19 kB