title: Sobornost’ in the Russian theological tradition
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Khondzinsky, Pavel V. (archpriest)
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kyrlezhev, Alexander I.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-11-08T10:45:30Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-11-08T10:45:30Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Khondzinsky P. V., Kyrlezhev A. I. Sobornost’ in the Russian theological tradition. Issues of Theology, 2019, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 427–440.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: http://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2019.307
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16555
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In a conversation between Alexander Kyrlezhev and Archpriest Pavel Khondzinsky,
  the concept of sobornost’, that arose in Russian theology by Alexei Khomyakov
  under the influence of the theology of J. Adam Möhler and German philosophy, is
  discussed with particular emphasis on the significance of the latter for the formation
  of the logical structure of a new ecclesiological concept. The ideas of the ancient
  father of the Church, St. Augustine, are taken into account. The interaction of the
  original Russian concept of sobornost’ with theological personalism at the end of
  the 19th–20th centuries is traced. Issues such as sobornost’ as unity and as unity in diversity, the relationship of Church sobornost’ with social community, a symphonic
  personality, and personification of the Church are considered. Development of
  the concept of sobornost’ by such authors as Filaret Drozdov, Vladimir Soloviev,
  Sylvester Malevansky, Evgeny Akvilonov, Pavel Florensky, Anthony Khrapovitsky,
  Sergiy Bulgakov, Nikolai Afanasyev, Georges Florovsky, Vladimir Lossky and others
  is specified. Other issues are also discussed such as the relationship between
  the Russian concept of sobornost’, the catholicity of the Creed, and the historical
  practice of church councils, primarily the All-Russian Council of 1917–1918, which
  marked both the “democratic turn” in the Church (the issue of the status of the laity)
  and the desire for personification of church unity (restoration of the patriarchate).
  In the conclusion, issues requiring further theological research are identified.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Issues of Theology;Volume 1; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sobornost’
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: catholicity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Church councils
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Alexei Khomyakov
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Adam Möhler
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: German idealism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russian theology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Sobornost’ in the Russian theological tradition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 427-440.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16555/1/427-440.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 651,9 kB