title: The сoncept of discretion in administrative law of Germany and its distinction from the judicial discretion
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Pudelka, Jörg
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2017-12-16T16:32:14Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2017-12-16T16:32:14Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2017-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Pudelka J. The сoncept of discretion in administrative law of Germany and its distinction from the judicial discretion. Vestnik SPbSU. Law, 2017, vol. 8, issue 4, pp. 443–451.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu14.2017.406
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/8756
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The author gives a definition of discretion as a one of the key institutes in administrative law. Discretion
  is a legal conception, used in executive state bodies and courts. The executive body must have borderlines
  of discretion if it has power of discretion and this may be a matter to the lawsuit or administrative
  revision made by the same executive body or highest executive body. The highest body may have
  its own opinion or may give another point of view if there is no doubt of the legality of the impugned
  decision. In particular, it means that an independent review must be provided of the expediency of
  the executive body`s decision. This formalized the main problem, because administrative courts have
  a right only to verify legal aspects in the decisions of executive power but not the expediency of its
  decisions. As part of the process in the administrative court, verification of discretionary decisions is
  limited only to testing the existence of one of the types of marginal discrepancies, rather than checking
  whether an administrative act or refusal to publish or not issuing an administrative act is illegal. In the
  following, the author gives a detailed description of the types of discretion and what errors of discretion
  exist. In conclusion, the article demonstrates arguments in favor of the existence of discretion, as
  there are doubts about the susceptibility of decisions with discretion with respect to corruption. Refs 2.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 8; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: court`s discretion
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: discretionary power
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: administrative act
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: principle of separation of powers (‘trias politica’)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: statute on administrative procedures
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: administrative procedural code
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: pretrial appeal
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: types of margin of appreciation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: corruption
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The сoncept of discretion in administrative law of Germany and its distinction from the judicial discretion
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 06-Pudelka.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/8756/1/06-Pudelka.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 631,53 kB