title: Function-and-behavior approaches in linguistics
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kasevich, Vadim B.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-03-03T14:33:08Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-03-03T14:33:08Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Kasevich V. B. Function-and-behavior approaches in linguistics. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2020, 17 (4): 532–536.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2020.401
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/25087
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Linguists are increasingly turning to approaches that say that language has no phonology
  per se, but one should speak about the phonology of speech production, speech perception
  and language acquisition. The same applies to morphology, syntax and smaller structures in
  the general architectonics of language/speech grammar. Nowadays, there is no description of grammar/phonology that would illustrate this logic. In the most general way, these approaches
  can be designated as behavioristic. It is argued here that oblivion of the principles of
  classical linguistics results in contradictions, unsolvable theoretical problems and delusions.
  Appeal to phonetics in the narrow sense of the term is unavoidable in modeling speech production,
  when reproducing from the “meaning to text” transition. The meaning is obviously
  immaterial, but the same cannot be said about the text. Another transition that in recent years
  began to be dealt with in linguistic literature on a par with Lev Shcherba’s “aspects”, is “text to
  language system”. The point of departure here is not easy to define, especially in the case of a
  natural speech. Two solutions are possible, one based on Chomsky’s postulation of the innate
  character of language, the other admitting a kind of recursive mechanism capable of “selfexpanding”
  as a result of an infinite number of iterations. As a solution, a combination of two
  levels may be proposed, prehonological and phonological (resp. semantic amd presemantic)
  which will be resonsible for both transitions.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 17; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: phonology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: speech production
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Lev Shcherba
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: functional communicative approaches
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Function-and-behavior approaches in linguistics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 532-536.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/25087/1/532-536.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 620,57 kB