title: The Long-term Effect of Low Recognition of To-be-forgotten Items Requires an Intention to Forget in Conjunction with a Means of Doing so
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Gofman, Alena A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Nourkova, Veronika V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-06-26T12:45:13Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-06-26T12:45:13Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Gofman A. A., Nourkova V. V. The Long-term Effect of Low Recognition of To-be-forgotten Items Requires an Intention to Forget in Conjunction with a Means of Doing so. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2019, vol. 9, issue 1, pp. 57–76.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2019.105
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15758
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In the present paper, we reviewed the studies relevant to the issue of intentional forgetting and assumed that it would be reasonable to examine whether the intention to forget itself decreases the probability to retrieve the to-be-forgotten stimulus or it should be combined with forgetting-evoking means. We reported the empirical study intended to verify their independence or interdependence. 20 Russian - made up language word pairs were exposed to participants (N = 71) three times. They then viewed each Russian word from a pair once, with randomized instructions “Forget”, “Remember”, “Repeat”, “Forget by generating associations to the Russian word” or a short cognitive task. Self-reports on the mnemonic strategies were collected. Recognition tests were administered two times - four hours and two months (N = 32) later. The probability to succeed by chance was 1 to 3. The main findings consisted of the fact that at two months delay the made-up words in the “Forget” and the “Remember” conditions were recognized the best, the words that were not processed in the context of any conscious mnemonic goals (“Repeat” and “Task”) were recognized worse, and the words in the “Forget by generating associations to the Russian word” condition were recognized the worst. This result brings us to the conclusion that the intention to achieve any goal with mnemonic content itself protects the material from forgetting at long time intervals. In contrast, the conjunction of mnemonic goal with congruent means might form a psychological tool that makes possible to keep the initial intention effective.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Psychology;Volume 9; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: intentional forgetting
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: mnemonic action
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: mnemonic goal
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: forgetting-evoking means
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: recognition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The Long-term Effect of Low Recognition of To-be-forgotten Items Requires an Intention to Forget in Conjunction with a Means of Doing so
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 57-76.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15758/1/57-76.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 858,05 kB