title: Nicolai Hartmann’s Philosophy of Objective Spirit as seen through his Colleagues’ Reviews
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kluck, Steffen
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-07-05T11:17:08Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-07-05T11:17:08Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Kluck S. Nicolai Hartmann’s Philosophy of Objective Spirit as seen through his Colleagues’ Reviews. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2019, vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 160–181.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2019-8-1-160-181
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15891
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This essay traces the reception of Nicolai Hartmann’s philosophy of objective spirit based on his colleagues’ reviews of his works. By examining this reception, important aspects of Hartmann’s work can be elucidated, for example, in the context of phenomenology (Martin Heidegger) and philosophical anthropology (Helmuth Plessner, Arnold Gehlen). In addition, any new ideas in the philosophy of the objective spirit will be likely to face objections analogous to those Hartmann’s theory encountered, which is why this analysis can probably have a systematic significance. In this connection, the article describes and analyzes some contemporary reviews and highlights principle arguments pro et contra Hartmann’s philosophy. It aims to show which authors criticized Hartmann with which frameworks to point out the position of his theory in the philosophy of the early 20th century. Furthermore, striking features and missing topics within the reviews are discussed. The conclusion of the article is that the reviewers praise Hartmann’s work for its phenomenological-empirical approach with rich, insightful descriptions and emphasize its ontologically founded middle position between Hegel and Marx, but at the same time characterize the book as theoretically weak and ambiguous. This finding can help to understand the work’s marginal reception and at the same time provides hints in which way it seems to be still up-to-date and relevant.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: de
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 8; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: phenomenology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: objective spirit
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: philosophical anthropology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: layered ontology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Hartmann
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Gehlen
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Plessner
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Heidegger
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: philosophy of 20th century
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Nicolai Hartmann’s Philosophy of Objective Spirit as seen through his Colleagues’ Reviews
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 160-181.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15891/1/160-181.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 662,85 kB