title: Сomparative analysis of morphemic and submorhemic neutralizations in Bantu pronominal paradigms (what they are for, and what they say about the language change)
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Zheltov, Alexander Yu.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2016-12-28T12:23:47Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2016-12-28T12:23:47Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2016-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Zheltov A. Yu. Сomparative analysis of morphemic and submorhemic neutralizations in Bantu pronominal paradigms (what they are for, and what they say about the language change). Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 13. Asian Studies. African Studies, 2016, issue 4, pp. 13–21.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu13.2016.402
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/5849
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This paper deals with a comparative analysis of the distribution of morphemic and submorphemic
  neutralizations in pronominal paradigms of the Bantu languages from different zones distributed into
  three geographical areas and Proto-Bantu reconstruction. The analysis shows that the neutralizations
  are not “occasional”, but rather systematic. Morphemic and submorphemic neutralizations are often in
  additional distribution, the more morphemic neutralizations in the paradigm, the less submorphemic
  ones. It is often important for paradigms to keep the structure of oppositions and neutralizations
  rather than the forms. All the neutralizations (1/2, 2/3, sg/pl) take place in all the languages despite
  the difference in forms. Sometimes 1/2 and 2/3 neutralizations are realized in cascade form (Basaa).
  It shows that all these neutralizations are crucially important to the ‘glue’ of pronominal paradigms.
  1 sg tends to be in opposition to other pronouns and very seldom participates in neutralizations. 3rd
  person is “responsible” for sg/pl neutralization, plural — for 1/2 neutralization, 2/3 is distributed in
  both sg. and pl. 1/2 neutralization tends to be submorphemic, while other types of neutralizations can
  be both morphemic and submorphemic. Refs 11. Tables 3.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Series 13. Asian Studies. African Studies;Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: morphemic neutralizations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: submorphemic neutralizations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Bantu languages
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: personal pronouns
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Сomparative analysis of morphemic and submorhemic neutralizations in Bantu pronominal paradigms (what they are for, and what they say about the language change)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 02-Zheltov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/5849/1/02-Zheltov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 664,7 kB