title: Role of the notary in the judicial reform
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Maleshin, Dmitry Ya.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-03-19T16:50:44Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-03-19T16:50:44Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Maleshin, Dmitry Ya. 2020. “Role of the notary in the judicial reform”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 1: 67–86.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.105
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17234
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: When the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation declared the goal of the current reform of
  civil justice to be simplification, it identified a number of means to achieve this goal. Special
  attention should be paid to the competence of a notary. Can a notary act as a judge? What is
  the role of a notary in the judicial system? This article examines the role of the notary as one
  of the means and proposes three measures that need to be adopted. The first is to expand the
  competence of the notary in special proceedings where there is no conflict between parties.
  In such cases, the notary takes on the competence of a judge in establishing a legal fact in the
  absence of a conflict between parties. The second is to draft special legislation concerning the
  procedure of notarial authentication of judicial proof, a procedure which is currently unavailable.
  The third is to expand notarial competence in enforcement inscription. This notarial
  competence is similar to judicial summary proceedings. The article concludes that if these
  measures are adopted, the expanded role of the notary could contribute significantly to reducing
  the workload of judges and to achieving the reform goal of simplifying civil justice.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 11; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: civil justice
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: notary procedure
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: judicial summary proceedings
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: enforcement inscription
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: reducing the workload of judges
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: notarial authentication of judicial proof
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Role of the notary in the judicial reform
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 67-86.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17234/1/67-86.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 683,13 kB