title: Histoire croisée of «Slavic reciprocity»
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Belov, Mikhail V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2017-10-11T09:45:39Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2017-10-11T09:45:39Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2017-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu19.2017.204
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/8477
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The model of cultural transfer, which came from comparative literary studies, is now applied to
  a wide range of borrowings (adaptations) of institutions, ideas and practices. In other words, the dissemination
  of the new term in the spirit of the theory which explains it should be seen as the result of intersectoral
  and transnational transfer. In addition, its propagandists note the difficulties in adapting of the borrowing
  in the Russian scientific tradition. The migration of the term beyond literary criticism led to different
  interpretations. The theoretical grounds of the transfer model differ in terms of the recognized conflict and
  hierarchy of the cultural space, as well as its dependence on economic (political) dominance. Differences are
  revealed in comparing the cultural transfer with adjacent theoretical constructions (the ideas of Y. M. Lotman,
  P. Casanova, F. Moretti). «Slavic reciprocity» in the light of such a paradigm can be viewed as a result
  of a multidirectional transfer (and I. G. Herder became the most significant adapter) or a number of re-inventions.
  This complicated understanding of the dynamics of multiple processes corresponds more closely to
  the «histoire croisée» (intertwined, intersecting, related history). In the second part of the article the author,
  relying on A. N. Robinson’s comparative study and some amendments to its methodology, demonstrates the
  probable sources of the Herder’s Slavic characterology. They are found in the Slavic historiography of the
  late Renaissance, Baroque and early Enlightenment, when there already was an intensive interchange. As
  shown in the article, institutional initiatives of Kollar’s «literary reciprocity» also relied on that available,
  rapidly spreading and mutated experience.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana;Issue 2(22)
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: «Slavic reciprocity»
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: cultural transfer
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: histoire croisée
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: I. G. Herder
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the formation of the Slavic nations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Histoire croisée of «Slavic reciprocity»
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 04-Belov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/8477/1/04-Belov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 330,74 kB