title: Two registers of actual political speech in modern Bulgarian media discourse
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Eftimova, Andreana B.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-01-28T12:56:55Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-01-28T12:56:55Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Eftimova, A. (2018). Two registers of actual political speech in modern Bulgarian media discourse. Media Linguistics, 5 (2), 233–243.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/spbu22.2018.207
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15334
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Media speech reflects most vividly problems in the functioning of language and ongoing
  processes in speech practice. That is why in its mirror we often examine the speech of
  politicians which is directly related to the main trends in speech practice — intellectualization
  and democratization of speech. To designate the two styles of political discourse, the article
  introduces two terminological phrases — Brussels newspeak and populist rhetoric. The
  Brussels newspeak — one of the styles in today's Bulgarian political communication — is
  in accordance with the process of intellectualization. A vivid expression of the process of
  democratization of speech is populist political discourse. The main characteristics of these
  styles are given. The competition between the two styles of political talk is based on a delicate
  balance in the political space. In the media field, there is a struggle between the participants in
  the conflict to make public think in the coordinate system of their concepts, understandings
  and values. These styles polarize and weaken public attitudes towards the verbal and nonverbal
  behavior of political actors and they are a serious challenge for journalists who must
  daily make choices as to whether to reflect an authentic political speech or abide by ethical
  journalistic standards and seek the truth.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Media Linguistics;Volume 5, no. 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: wooden language
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: populism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: political speech
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: media speech
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Two registers of actual political speech in modern Bulgarian media discourse
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 07-Eftimova.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15334/1/07-Eftimova.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 733,41 kB