title: Once Again about the Purpose of Ivangorod
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Vozgrin, Valerii E.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Teryukov, Alexander I.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-05-23T21:34:45Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-05-23T21:34:45Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Vozgrin V. E., Teryukov A. I. Once Again about the Purpose of Ivangorod. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2019, vol. 64, issue 1, рp. 311–322.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/ spbu02.2019.120
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15529
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article analyzes a number of problems posed in the monograph by Professor A. I. Filyushkin “Inventing the First War of Russia and Europe” devoted to the perception of the Livonian and other wars by contemporaries and descendants. One of these problems — namely, the reasons for long-standing aspiration of Russians to the Baltic — attracted the attention of Professor P. A. Krotov, and he published a review of this work. His review criticizes the main position of the author of the book, according to which the Moscovite rulers moved in this direction seeking to expand and protect their possessions, and not having the aim of developing merchant shipping, as is commonly believed. Defending the traditional point of view, P. A. Krotov bases his evidence on the example of Ivangorod, which, in his opinion, became the first Baltic seaport of Muscovy and the forerunner of St. Petersburg. The weakness of the scholar’s position lies in its speculative nature. Realizing the importance of real evidence to prove the functioning of Ivangorod as a commercial seaport, P. A. Krotov does not point out a single one, which is why his entire review loses its academic validity. In addition, focusing on this fictitious drawback of the book, the critic overlooks its other, quite real flaws. Therefore, the second part of this article is entirely devoted to their identification. By and large, the article aims at correcting the shortcomings that interfere with the holistic perception of the innovative concept of A. I. Filyushkin, which is objectively worthy of attention.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Volume 64; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: The Baltic Sea
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the Livonian War
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Ivan the Terrible
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Stephen Báthory
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Commercial Navigation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Political Competition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Indigenous People
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Once Again about the Purpose of Ivangorod
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 20.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15529/1/20.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 676,85 kB