title: What kind of expert is valuable for science? (On the issue of typological characteristics of expert knowledge)
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Shchedrina, Irina O.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Zhuravel, Evgeny P.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-02-07T09:42:49Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-02-07T09:42:49Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Shchedrina I. O., Zhuravel E. P. What kind of expert is valuable for science? (On the issue of typological characteristics of expert knowledge). Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2022, vol. 38, issue 4, pp. 562–571. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.410 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.410
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38972
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article presents the results of an epistemological study of expertise, taking into account the
  typologies of this cognitive and social phenomenon that exist today in the world and domestic
  philosophical and methodological community. The authors reveal its typological characteristics,
  relying on the phenomenological approach to social and humanitarian subject formations.
  This approach shows that expertise always involves two levels of assessment: fundamental and
  applied. At the applied level, the expert solves a very specific problem, in accordance with the
  goals of the customer, at the fundamental (coexisting with the applied) level, he tries to integrate
  the result into the expanding knowledge about the world and humanity. Any expertise is
  subject to an external, social, in its essence, request, and the emphasis on applied knowledge is focused on the implementation of this request in an expert opinion, i. e. fixes the boundaries of
  the request implementation. As an alternative to this approach, there is an appeal in the course
  of an expert assessment to the fundamental cognitive attitudes that are present in its basis (orienting
  the expert analysis to the expansion of the study). Such appeals, among other things,
  increase the degree of objectivity of expert assessments due to their fundamental intentionality
  and intersubjective verifiability. And the reflexive hermeneutic competence of an expert helps
  to overcome cognitive gaps that arise in the process of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary
  research. The phenomenological approach allows us to consider expertise as a cultural and
  historical phenomenon, and the expert not just as an element of the scientific system, but as a
  well-educated professional who recognizes himself as a part of history and culture.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The research has been performed within the project supported by the Russian Science Foundation
  no. 22-28-01632 “Expert examination as an epistemological phenomenon in the context of distinction
  between fundamental and applied guidelines in science”.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 38; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: expertise
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: expert practices
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: fundamental
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: applied
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: cultural-historical epistemology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: What kind of expert is valuable for science? (On the issue of typological characteristics of expert knowledge)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 10.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/38972/1/10.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 655,5 kB