title: Limping relationships in international family law
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Voytovich, Elena P.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-03-23T21:23:13Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-03-23T21:23:13Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Voytovich, Elena P. 2023. “Limping relationships in international family law”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 1: 211–226. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.113 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.113
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/39387
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article examines a legal phenomenon that has not received a generalized legal characteristic,
  its research in international family law is fragmentary. The reasons for the “lame” relationships
  are analyzed: differences in conflict of laws regulation, incorrect application of conflict of
  laws rules, discrepancy between substantive regulations, conflict of jurisdictions; it is concluded
  that “lame” relationships are the result of the interaction of conflict of laws, substantive and
  procedural norms, leading to an undesirable legal effect. The author expresses doubts about
  the effectiveness of such a method of eliminating “lame” relationships as the convergence of
  legal systems, suggesting to pay attention to the competing traditional conflict tools and the
  opposite methodological approach — recognition, the potential of which is underestimated
  and insufficiently studied. Recognition is seen not as an alternative to conflict method, but as an additional way to overcome “lame” relationships. Replacement of national conflict of
  laws rules in cross-border family disputes is illustrated by the practice of the European Court
  of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union. Attention is drawn to the
  existing models of recognition in common law countries and continental legal tradition, the
  legal nature and place of the norms of Russian family legislation on recognition are analyzed.
  The mechanism of recognition of foreign administrative procedures and decisions, foreign
  documents in the Russian Federation is assessed. The author comes to the conclusion that
  implementation in domestic law of various approaches to the recognition of foreign court
  decisions, administrative procedures and documents issued by the competent authorities of
  foreign states, proposing to unify them within the framework of a uniform recognition procedure
  that excludes uncertainty and internal contradictions.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 14; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: conflict of laws
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: unification
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: recognition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: legalization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: status
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: private international law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Limping relationships in international family law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 13.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/39387/1/13.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 672,04 kB