title: Theme of Lucifer and forms of speech in Icelandic biblical paraphrase
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Ogurechnikova, Natalija
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-08-18T13:32:56Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-08-18T13:32:56Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Ogurechnikova N. L. Theme of Lucifer and forms of speech in Icelandic biblical paraphrase. Scandinavian Philology, 2022, vol. 20, issue 1, pp. 127–149.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu21.2022.109
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/37460
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The subject of the article is the theme of Lucifer in Lilja, a poetic Icelandic biblical
  paraphrase dating from the first half of the 14th century. When analyzing Lucifer stanzas,
  attention is paid to the forms of speech of the author, their communicative properties
  and distribution. Attention to the sources of the monologue is determined by specificity
  of its structure and by peculiarities of the internal monologue as a form of speech. One
  thesis is that the context of St. Anselm’s speculative theology supports an interpretation
  of the monologue, which corresponds to the main idea of all Lucifer stanzas in Lilja.
  The article contains two sections, within the framework of which the following tasks are
  solved: In the first section, the forms of speech in Lucifer stanzas are compared with the
  forms of speech in the songs of the Poetic Edda; the purpose of the comparative analysis is
  to clarify relationship of Icelandic biblical paraphrase to the poetic traditions of Iceland.
  The second section of the article examines Lucifer’s monologue and its sources; here the
  structure of the monologue is considered and its meaning is clarified in the context of
  Lucifer stanzas on the one hand and the works of St. Anselm on the other. Results of the
  analysis are summarized in the Conclusion. The main method of work is comparative
  textual analysis from the standpoint of historical poetics.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Scandinavian Philology;Volume 20; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Icelandic biblical paraphrase
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: drapa
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: composition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: skaldic poetry
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Poetic Edda
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: forms of speech
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: theme of Lucifer
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Lucifer’s monologue
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Theme of Lucifer and forms of speech in Icelandic biblical paraphrase
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 127-149.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/37460/1/127-149.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 768,19 kB