title: A small note about a big misunderstanding, or Whether Saint Philothei (Leshchinsky) was the author of Sibirskij Lestvichnik?
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Soboleva, Larisa Stepanovna
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Dergacheva-Skop, Elena Ivanovna
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-08-29T15:36:28Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-08-29T15:36:28Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Soboleva L. S. A small note about a big misunderstanding, or Whether Saint Philothei (Leshchinsky) was the author of Sibirskij Lestvichnik?. Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana, 2019, vol. 1 (25), pp. 193–200.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu19.2019.114
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16227
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The authors focus their attention on the analysis of the late 17th century edition of the manuscript “Sibirskij lestvichnik” (GIM. Sin. sobr. 120 (262)), carried out in 2015 in Tyumen. The publication received numerous praise in the local press, was among the winners of the competition for the best book. Meanwhile, the reference of the manuscript to the authorship of Philofei (Leshchinsky), established in science, raises great objections. The study of the manuscript does not give the right to make such conclusions. The authors express new assumptions about the reasons for the creation of the manuscript and its popularity among readers. The quality of translation, which does not take into account many peculiarities of the manuscript’s language (syntactic, morphological, and stylistic), is equally doubtful, as is the quality of its translation, which distorts the meaning and individual features of the language. The design of the edition does not meet modern requirements to the accuracy of the source of illustrations.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The research was supported by the Russian Scientifc Foundation, project № 19-18-00186
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana;Volume 1 (25)
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Philofei Leshchinsky
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Sibirskij Lestvichnik
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Orthodox culture
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: edition of Old Russian manuscripts
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: A small note about a big misunderstanding, or Whether Saint Philothei (Leshchinsky) was the author of Sibirskij Lestvichnik?
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 193-200.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16227/1/193-200.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 1,09 MB