title: Vindication in Case law of The Constitutional Court of The Russian Federation and legal statistics
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Molodyko, Kirill. Yu.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2017-07-18T14:59:49Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2017-07-18T14:59:49Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2017-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Molodyko K. Yu. Vindication in Case law of The Constitutional Court of The Russian Federation and legal statistics.Vestnik SPbSU. Law, 2017, vol. 8, issue 2, pp. 225–241.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/ spbu14.2017.209
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/6916
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This article is the first part of research into vindication. The second part will focus on the analysis of
  academic positions. In this first part the author proves that the Constitutional Court of the Russian
  Federation unreasonably found inadmissible some constitutional claims of citizens who challenged
  vindication related to provisions of the Civil Code of Russia. Actual practice of the court on this issue is
  assessed as contradictory, which has both positive and negative elements. When a positive assessment of the new clarification of the Supreme Court regarding bona fide purchaser criteria is examined, it is
  criticized for the lack of attention to the initiation of the correction to new provisions of Art 200.1 of
  the Civil Code of Russia related to limitation periods which are erroneous when applied to vindication.
  An analysis of judicial statistics, in spite of the shortcomings of such a methodology, confirms: a) the
  high social importance of vindication disputes, b) the lack of public trust in the state compensations in
  cases of disputes related to vindication of property from a bona fide purchaser. Refs 5.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 8; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: vindication
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: bona fide purchaser
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: constitutionality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: limitation period
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: disposals of ownership
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Vindication in Case law of The Constitutional Court of The Russian Federation and legal statistics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 09-Molodyko.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/6916/1/09-Molodyko.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 646,49 kB