title: Historical Anthropology in Eurasia
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Schorkowitz, Dittmar
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-10-25T17:53:50Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-10-25T17:53:50Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Schorkowitz D. Historical Anthropology in Eurasia. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2019, vol. 64, iss. 3, рp. 1114–1145.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2019.318
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16439
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article reconsiders various notions and conceptions of historical anthropology as means
  of enhancing our knowledge and understanding of social and cultural processes. The author
  pays attention to a very complex problem — interrelationship between History and Anthropology.
  What is Historical Anthropology? Where is its place among other historical disciplines?
  Why it is so important? What about its possibilities and possible drawbacks, at the
  same time? The article poses these and some other important questions to the scholars and
  suggests answers. A careful attention is devoted to Anthropology within post socialist Eurasia,
  and to some post-colonial legacy on this territory. Different ways of conducting historical-anthropological
  studies are explored in order to determine which perspectives may be applied to
  Eurasia. The approaches discussed include ethnohistorical research, studies of transformation
  and persistence of social organization and cultural identity, interethnic relations, and relations
  between ethnic minorities and the state. The author examines the peculiarities of continental
  colonialism and its difference from other forms. With respect to methodological and theoretical
  implications inherent in the interdisciplinary relationship between history and anthropology,
  a concise outline of research carried out by Max Planck Institute focus group is given. A
  framework is thus provided for discussing arguments that concentrate on the need to establish
  a new format of (post-) colonial studies adjusted to the peculiarities of this macro-region,
  which entails a close cooperation between ethnologists from Russia, the Commonwealth of
  Independent States, and China, where both disciplines have gained new significance in recent
  years.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Volume 64; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Eurasia
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Historical Anthropology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Ethnohistory
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: сolonialism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: (рost-) colonial studies
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Historical Anthropology in Eurasia
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 1114-1145.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16439/1/1114-1145.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 784,89 kB