title: The end of the First World War: the formation of global intergovernmental structures and global political trends
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Lebedeva, Marina M.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-11-13T09:18:18Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-11-13T09:18:18Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Lebedeva M. M. The end of the First World War: the formation of global intergovernmental structures and global political trends. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 2019, vol. 12, issue 3, pp. 264–275.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu06.2019.301
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16567
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This article is devoted to the analysis of what political trends, structures and ideas laid down
  by the results of World War I are reflected in the practice of current world politics. It is shown
  that at the end of World War I not only the field called “international relations”, with its two
  classical theories — realism and liberalism—was formed, but also the political organization
  of the world was significantly changed. Firstly, as a result of the war, the first ever system of
  international (interstate) relations was formed, Versailles-Washington, which went beyond
  the limits of the European continent. Secondly, the first universal international organization
  was created — the League of Nations. All this served as a strong impetus for the implementation
  of global political ideas and the formation of global governance structures, and
  later it was developed in the processes of political globalization and the liberal world order,
  understood as openness, rationality and adherence to common legal norms and standards.
  At the same time, the article shows that both globalization and the liberal world order are
  not identical with Westernization or Americanization. Thirdly, as a result of the creation of
  a socialist state, the Westphalian model of the world was challenged, not only in theoretical
  terms, but in practical terms. In other words, an attempt was made to build an alternative to
  the Westphalian model.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: Статья подготовлена по гранту РФФИ и АНО ЭИСИ 2019 № 19-011-31053 «Мегатренды мировой политики в ХХI веке: сферы проявления и развития».
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. International Relations;Volume 12; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: World War I
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: system of international (interstate) relations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Westphalian model of the world
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: globalization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: liberal world order
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The end of the First World War: the formation of global intergovernmental structures and global political trends
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Animation
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 264-275.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16567/1/264-275.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 646,48 kB