title: Liturgical argument in defense of Orthodoxy in the polemical collection of the Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences 16.3.13
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Panchenko, Sergey V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kretov, Andrej V. (priest)
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-03-23T17:04:47Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-03-23T17:04:47Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Panchenko S. V., Kretov A. V. Liturgical argument in defense of Orthodoxy in the polemical collection of the Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences 16.3.13. Issues of Theology, 2023, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 45–57. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2023.103 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2023.103
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/39365
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In a poorly covered polemical collection of the 17th century of the Library of the
  Academy of Sciences 16.3.13 there is a controversy between supporters of the Orthodox
  and Latin teachings about the Eucharist. The writings of the brothers Likhudov
  and monk Euthymius are placed along with the heretical writings of Sylvester
  Medvedev and the banned deacon Athanasius. In this article, we will pay attention
  to the “liturgical” direction in the argument, when the parties participating in the
  controversy find confirmation of their position in the order of the Divine Liturgy.
  This is done by referring to the authority of the liturgies of the Eastern Orthodox
  Church: Saints John and Basil, the Apostles Mark and James, brother of God, as well
  as the study of the “Latin” liturgy of the Apostle Peter. The complexity of describing
  the liturgical argument lies in its arbitrary arrangement on the pages of the collection.
  The purpose of this work is to consider the liturgical argument in defense of
  the Orthodox teaching on the time of the transubstantiation of the Gifts in the littlecovered
  polemical collection of the Library of the Academy of Sciences 16.3.13. The
  content of the manuscript will be considered in the context of the polemic with the
  “bread-worshipping” heresy, after which the method of liturgical polemic based on
  the rites of the liturgies will be examined. In conclusion, preliminary conclusions
  are made about the meaning of the liturgical argument.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Issues of Theology;Volume 5; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Liturgy of the Apostle James
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Liturgy of the Apostle Peter
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: polemics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: polemical collections
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Latinism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Eastern Orthodoxy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the doctrine of the Eucharist
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Liturgical argument in defense of Orthodoxy in the polemical collection of the Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences 16.3.13
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 45-57.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/39365/1/45-57.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 686,07 kB