title: Moving to ambidextrous organization: A systematic literature review
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Smara, Rafik
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Bogatyreva, Karina A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-08-08T18:42:49Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-08-08T18:42:49Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Smara R., Bogatyreva K. A. 2023. Moving to ambidextrous organization: A systematic literature review. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management 22 (2): 191–225. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu08.2023.203
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu08.2023.203
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/43630
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The existing studies support the positive impact of organizational ambidexterity on a firm’s performance and its ability to succeed in the dynamic environments resulted from the COVID-19 pandemics or contexts characterized by a variety of rising tensions. In business organizations, ambidexterity manifests itself in maintaining a balance between exploration and exploitation strategies. Achieving ambidexterity is a challenging managerial task. The purpose of this paper is to identify behaviours of firms to increase their ability to develop and maintain ambidexterity as well as specify organizational systems and processes that induce and balance both exploitation and exploration. The authors develop an integrative framework that provides a comprehensive understanding of the path towards ambidexterity in organizations. This review reveals the fact that with the purpose to meet the conflicting demands of the ambidexterity agenda, managers should adapt the organizational culture, strategic goals and structure in order to implement two incompatible innovation strategies. The study identifies three closely related ambidexterity support systems and their underlying mechanisms, procedures, and leadership styles. Also, the main gaps in the literature and relevant directions for further empirical research are outlined. Keywords: ambidexterity, balance, exploration, exploitation.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: This research has been conducted with financial support from the Russian science foundation grant
  (project No. 21-78-10024), https://rscf.ru/en/project/21-78-10024/
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Management;Volume 22; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ambidexterity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: balance
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: exploration
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: exploitation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Moving to ambidextrous organization: A systematic literature review
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 941.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/43630/1/941.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 391,55 kB