title: Landowners’ Сolonization of Bashkiria
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Shaikhislamov, Rashit B.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Aznabaev, Bulat A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2018-12-27T14:36:48Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2018-12-27T14:36:48Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Shaikhislamov R. B., Aznabaev B. A. Landowners’ Сolonization of Bashkiria. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2018, vol. 63, issue 4, рp. 987–1000.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu02.2018.401
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15203
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The “closed city” practice, exercised in Ufa province before 1735, together with the unfavourable
  political situation led to the bad crisis of estate landownership of the Ufa district. The
  population polls of the mid-XVII — beginning of XVIII cc. justify the fact that Ufa noblemen
  had to succumb to the fate of socially deprived Siberian nobility, practically devoid of serf
  peasants. The beginning of the largest-scale Bashkir insurrection of 1735–1736 made the administration
  review its attitude to the former ban on Bashkir estate lands sale. In the history
  of Bashkir landowners’ colonization the edict dated February 11th, 1736, allowing the local officers
  and officials to buy lands from Bashkir communities, was of principal importance. This
  procedure was exercised simultaneously with the establishment of the Russian government
  military control over the south-eastern border, separating Bashkir estate lands from Kazakh
  migratory tribes. From this moment on there is a stop in diplomatic contacts of the Bashkir
  elite with the governors of the Middle Asia, Kazakhstan and Turkey that meant the complete
  loss of political subjection by the Bashkirs. Bashkir communities become active participants of
  economic relations with Russian landowners, plant owners and the state institutions. Russian
  government preserved estate dynastic rights with the Bashkirs and refused from large-scale
  operations on the expropriation of Bashkir lands, transferring the mission of colonization to
  private persons, who had to arrange the issue with the local communities by themselves. The
  permission to sell estate lands forced landowners to active participation in the system of Russian
  legal relations, to contact the Russian government and customers.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Volume 63; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Bashkiria
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: landowners
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: estates
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: landownership
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: peasants
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: serfs
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: donations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Bashkir insurrections
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Landowners’ Сolonization of Bashkiria
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 01-Shaykhislamov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15203/1/01-Shaykhislamov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 651,17 kB