title: Risk-reflections’ Conflict Potential: Conceptual Models and Research Problems of the Modern Analytics
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Aleinikov, Andrei V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Strebkov, Alexandr I.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Miletskiy, Vladimir P.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-10-09T20:01:03Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-10-09T20:01:03Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Aleinikov A. V., Strebkov A. I., Miletskiy V. P. Risk-reflections’ Conflict Potential: Conceptual Models and Research Problems of the Modern Analytics. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2023, vol. 39, issue 3, pp. 514–530. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.309 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.309
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44158
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Correlation problem of contradictions between “risk-beneficiaries” and “risk-outsiders” gains
  particular relevance during periods of the established order’s forced change and fundamental,
  ontological uncertainty. On the basis of riskological literature generalization we offer conflict
  potential’s analysis methodology of different risk-reflections’ types. Theoretical developments
  on problems of risk and protection/security forms’ dialectic and dialectic of risk’s foundation
  and its reflection had served as research’s conceptual framework. In this debate special place is
  occupied by works by U. Beck whose interpretation of actualization of social tensions is linked
  with the conflictual perception of risks’ producers and consumers and works by P. Virno who
  suggested certain theoretical solutions on methodology of risks-reflexivity’s key elements’ singling
  out. Authors’ attention is focused on the main reflexive characteristics of stakeholders’
  analysis. It is shown that risk-reflections are fraught with ideological and political preferences
  while in risks’ distribution process there is difference of hierarchies in which under certain
  stakeholders’ dominance, risk-beneficiaries shape outsiders’ adaptation strategies to their advantage
  in zone of threats and dangers, imposing them certain risk-reflections models, winning
  chances’ institualization forms and risk behavior strategies. Article considers approaches
  to the solution of the issue of the different interests’ groups’ selection criteria of the dangers’
  priorities’ importance and significance and evaluation/revaluation/underestimation issue of
  risk severity levels and its social acceptability. Article presents theoretical perspective of the
  socially acceptable risk level, its capacity, limit and disagreement of social subjects with the
  evaluation of tolerance towards risk on the basis of “risk-appetite” model. In this context special
  attention is paid to the threats’ free “selling and buying” logic, e.g. security as the source of
  risk management resources’ conversion into possession of power and property. Authors come
  to the conclusion that risks exploitation and earning rent from risks management along with
  reflexive conservation of risks’ distribution system cause society’s conflict potential’s growth.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The reserarch was funded by the Russian Science Foundation grant no. 19-18-00115, https://rscf.ru/project/19-18-00115/
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 39; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: risk
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: risk-reflection
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: conflict
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: uncertainty
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: risk-stakeholders
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: risk-beneficiary
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: riskoutsiders
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Risk-reflections’ Conflict Potential: Conceptual Models and Research Problems of the Modern Analytics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 09.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/44158/1/09.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 684,08 kB