title: BEYOND ONTOLOGY: ON BLAUSTEIN’S RECONSIDERATION OF INGARDEN’S AESTHETICS
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: PŁOTKA, WITOLD
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-12-09T15:17:54Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-12-09T15:17:54Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: PLOTKA W. BEYOND ONTOLOGY: ON BLAUSTEIN’S RECONSIDERATION OF INGARDEN’S AESTHETICS. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2020, vol. 9, issue 2, pp. 552–578.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-2-552-578
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/21403
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article addresses the popular reading of Ingarden that his aesthetic theory is determined by ontology. This reading seems to suggest that, firstly, aesthetics lacks its autonomy, and, secondly, the
  subject of aesthetic experience is reproductive, and passive. The author focuses on Ingarden’s aesthetics
  formulated by him in the period of 1925–1944. Moreover, the study presents selected elements of Ingarden’s phenomenology of aesthetic experience, and by doing so, the author aims at showing how Ingarden’s aesthetics was reconsidered by Blaustein, a student of Ingarden, whose theory seems to lead one
  beyond the scope of ontology. Blaustein, namely, reconsiders Ingarden’s theory of purely intentional
  objects by interpreting it in a descriptive-psychological, or phenomenological fashion. The article is divided into four parts. In section 1, the author highlights historical interconnections between Ingarden,
  and Blaustein. Section 2.1. is devoted to Ingarden’s phenomenological approach towards aesthetic experience as a phasic structure. At this basis, in section 2.2., Ingarden’s early theory of intentional objects
  is to be discussed. Section 3 concerns Blaustein’s contribution to phenomenology of aesthetic experience. Given that Blaustein formulates his theory in discussion with Ingarden, section 3.1. is devoted
  to Blaustein’s critical assessment of Ingarden’s method, and aesthetics. Next, in section 3.2., the author
  presents Blaustein’s original theory of presentations, and its use in aesthetics. Finally, in section 4, the
  author lists similarities, and differences between Blaustein’s and Ingarden’s aesthetic theories.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The project was held within the research grant on “The Presence
  of Kazimierz Twardowski’s Thought in Early Phenomenology in Poland” financed by the National
  Science Centre, Poland within the OPUS program (No. 2017/27/B/HS1/02455).
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 9; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: aesthetic experience
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: descriptive psychology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: purely intentional object
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: theory of presentations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Ingarden
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Blaustein
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: BEYOND ONTOLOGY: ON BLAUSTEIN’S RECONSIDERATION OF INGARDEN’S AESTHETICS
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 552-578.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/21403/1/552-578.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 684,83 kB