title: Influence of irrelevant verbal satiation on the negative priming effect
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Naumenko, Olga V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kostina, Daria I.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2018-02-09T16:06:40Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2018-02-09T16:06:40Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2017-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Naumenko O. V., Kostina D. I. Influence of irrelevant verbal satiation on the negative priming effect. Vestnik SPbSU. Psychology and Education, 2017, vol. 7, issue 4, pp. 328–342.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu16.2017.403
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/9126
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Multiple repetitions of the same word induce the verbal satiation effect — a feeling of complete or
  partial loss of meaning for the given word. Objectively this effect manifests itself in slower performance
  for tasks associated with a repeated word. According to V. Allakhverdov (2000) we assume
  that the attempt to keep realizing the unchanged content will help to “forget” the common meanings
  of this content. Our consciousness cannot stay empty, thus some other new meanings (which
  were previously “blocked but activated” because of a negative choice) should replace the “forgotten”
  meanings. These new meanings should not be necessarily related to the repeated stimuli. Here we
  used the negative priming method for experimental control of the “blocked but activated” stimuli.
  The main task for our participants was to read a target word as quickly as possible while ignoring the distractor word. The additional task appeared after every 3 probes of the main task: we asked
  our participants to read 10 words aloud (in the control group) or repeat the same one word aloud
  for 10 times (in the experimental group). The negative priming effect was found — the reaction was
  slower for the target stimuli, which have been previously presented as the distractors — but it decreased
  under the influence of verbal satiation in those subjects who performed the main task more
  slowly (they also pronounced the repeated words much more slowly in comparison to the control
  group). In addition, the irrelevant verbal satiation speeded up overall subjects’ responses during the
  main task. Refs 42. Figs 3. Table 1.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках проекта
  № 16-36-00297 мол_а.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Psychology and Education;Volume 7; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: verbal satiation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: negative priming
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: awareness
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: aftereffects
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ignored distractors
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Influence of irrelevant verbal satiation on the negative priming effect
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 03-Naumenko.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/9126/1/03-Naumenko.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 833,23 kB