title: Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage and the environment
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Ubertazzi, Benedetta
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-12-10T20:50:39Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-12-10T20:50:39Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Ubertazzi, Benedetta. 2020. Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage and the environment. Pravovedenie 64 (1): 124–137.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.110
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33843
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (hereafter known as
  the Convention) was adopted within the framework of UNESCO in October 2003. Article 2 of the
  Convention establishes that intangible cultural heritage (ICH) must be compatible with sustainable
  development. Sustainable development in relation to culture consists of three intertwined
  dimensions: society, environment, and economy. Chapter 6 of the Operational Directives for the
  Implementation of this Convention establishes a framework related to “environmental sustainability”.
  The framework consists of three pillars. The first pillar relates to “environmental impacts
  in the safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage”. The second pillar relates to “knowledge
  and practices concerning nature and the universe”. The final pillar concerns “community-based
  resilience to natural disasters and climate change”. Through analysis of the Convention, the
  Convention’s Operational Directives and elements of intangible cultural heritage inscribed on
  the Representative List of the Convention, this article will provide case studies where, in line with
  these pillars, intellectual property rights, particularly geographical indications, aim to support
  environmentally friendly practices. In so doing, this article will also seek to show that intellectual
  property rights can recognise communities as bearers of knowledge about nature and as essential
  actors in sustaining the environment. Indeed, this work will suggest that although intellectual
  property rights, if not carefully drafted, can pose risks for environmental sustainability,
  when correctly adopted they have the capacity to empower communities. Thus, the aim of this
  work is to show how intellectual property rights can be tools to facilitate safeguarding and sustainability
  for both intangible cultural heritage and the environment.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 64; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: cultural heritage
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: environmental sustainability
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: intellectual property rights
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: UNESCO
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: intangible cultural heritage
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: community
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage and the environment
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 124-137.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/33843/1/124-137.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 702,89 kB