title: Features of the Study of Industrial and Construction Management Reform in the Latest Russian Historiography
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Mineev, A. I.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-07-11T09:31:07Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-07-11T09:31:07Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2024-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Mineev A. I. ’Features of the Study of Industrial and Construction Management Reform in the Latest Russian Historiography’, Modern History of Russia, vol. 14, no. 1, 2024, pp.127–143. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu24.2024.108 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu24.2024.108
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/45722
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article analyzed the peculiarities of studying various aspects of the reform of industry and construction
  management (1957–1965) in the works of modern Russian researchers, highlighted the main trends in
  the development of the domestic historiography of the issue. It was revealed that in the last two and a half decades
  the history of councils of the national economy (sovnarchoz) has been studied mainly at the regional level,
  with the wide use of specific historical materials identified in the funds of local archives. At the same time, quite a
  lot of theoretical works have been prepared, devoted directly to the reasons, progress of implementation and the
  results of the reform. The article draws attention to the variety of aspects of the topic studied by modern researchers.
  The issues on which the discussions between historian scholars are most active are highlighted: the ratio of
  economic, political and subjective factors that led to the transition to a new system of industrial and construction
  management; the problem of the essence of reform, the degree of its radicality; reasons for the winding down
  of reform. Based on a comparison of different points of view, the author describes the fundamental differences
  in approaches to the study of these issues. The article shows the commonality of the views of researchers in
  highlighting the shortcomings in the activities of the sovnarkhoz created on the ground, and assessing the reform
  as hasty and contradictory. It is concluded that with all the variety of published works, at present the topic of the
  history of the sovnarkhoz in the Soviet Union has the potential to expand both “wide” and “deep”, by studying new aspects of the topic, introducing previously unused historical sources into scientific circulation, systematizing,
  generalizing and rethinking existing views and assessments.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Modern History of Russia;Volume 14; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sovnarkhoz
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: decentralization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: industry
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: USSR
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: reform
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Features of the Study of Industrial and Construction Management Reform in the Latest Russian Historiography
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 08_mineev.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/45722/1/08_mineev.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 836,78 kB