title: Interchangeability as the feature of synonymy (experimental and corpus research)
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Belov, Vadim A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2018-11-07T15:38:56Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2018-11-07T15:38:56Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Belov V. A. Interchangeability as the feature of synonymy: (experimental and corpus research). Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature, 2018, vol. 15, issue 3, pp. 390– 411.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/spbu09.2018.306
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15041
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In the paper interchangeability is regarded as a feature (criterion) of synonymy. The research
  is based on the psycholinguistic experiment and Russian National Corpus data. 144 subjects
  took part in the experiment: they were given 22 sentences in which subjects could choose one
  of the given synonyms. The hypothesis of the research is that the interchangeability depends
  on the types of semantic relation within synonymic groups; synonymic relations are directly
  organized. The important task of the research is to determine the role of collocation in the
  choice of synonyms. MI (Mutual Information) is а special tool to measure the collocation
  strength, it measures a relationship between two random linguistic items that are sampled
  simultaneously. With the help of the Russian National Corpus data, MI is calculated for each
  utterance. There are few types of synonymic groups with different semantic relations: centric,
  middle asymmetric, and non-centric. These types are distinguished in my previous paper.
  The centric synonymic groups have the headword (typically the headword is the most frequent
  word); the middle asymmetric synonymic groups have two headwords, that are the core
  synonyms; the non-centric synonymic groups have no headword. Directivity of synonymic
  relations depends on the type of a synonymic group. It is possible to introduce three following
  models: for the centric synonymic groups: subordinated synonym → headword; for the
  middle asymmetric groups: subordinated synonym → core synonyms; for the non-centric
  synonymic group: synonym → another synonym. As a result, it was shown that different contextual
  features are significant (for example, the meaning of neighboring words, general utterance
  sense) for the choice of synonyms.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 15; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: lexical semantics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: synonymy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: synonymic set
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: interchangeability
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: collocation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Interchangeability as the feature of synonymy (experimental and corpus research)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 06-Belov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15041/1/06-Belov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 733,7 kB