title: Implementation in EU member states of norms regarding the European Investigation Order
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Biriukov, Pavel N.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-12-11T13:11:16Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-12-11T13:11:16Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Biriukov, Pavel N. 2019 “Implementation in EU member states of norms regarding the European Investigation Order”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 3: 566–576.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.311
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16806
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the European Union is to be based on the principle
  of mutual recognition of judgments and judicial decisions. Many conventions and acts
  of secondary law have been issued within the EU. In this article, the author examines the issues
  of implementation of the Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the
  Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters in
  the EU states. This new approach is based on a single instrument called the European Investigation
  Order (EIO). An EIO is to be issued for the purpose of having one or several specific
  investigative measure(s) carried out in the state executing the EIO with a view to gathering
  evidence. With a view of ensuring the transmission of the EIO to the competent authority of
  the executing state, the issuing authority may make use of any possible or relevant means of
  transmission, for example the secure telecommunications system of the European Judicial
  Network, Eurojust, or other channels used by judicial or law enforcement authorities. The
  EIO should focus on the investigative measure to be carried out. The issuing authority is best
  placed to decide, on the basis of its knowledge of the details of the investigation concerned,
  which investigative measure is to be used. The questions of the authorities competent to execute
  the Order are considered. The procedure for the execution and direction of the Order is
  examined. Grounds for failure to comply with EU and member state law are being explored.
  It is shown that the Order is a new step in the development of communitarian mechanisms in
  the field of legal assistance in criminal matters.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 10; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: European Union
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: principle of mutual recognition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: European Investigation Order
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: competent authorities of EU member states
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: implementation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Implementation in EU member states of norms regarding the European Investigation Order
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 566-576.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16806/1/566-576.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 626,98 kB