title: “La Trahison des Images”: Intentional discrepancy between individual will and its declaration
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Zezekalo, Alexander Y.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-10-16T11:13:34Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-10-16T11:13:34Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Zezekalo, Alexander Y. 2023. “La Trahison des Images”: Intentional discrepancy between individual will and its declaration. Pravovedenie 67 (3): 305–313. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.304
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.304
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44252
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The paper is intended to pursue the old issue of the underlying basis of contracts as well as legal
  transactions on the whole. The main idea is, consequently, to explore, using example of vices
  of will caused by intentional discrepancy between the internal will and its declaration, which
  theoretical pattern should be applied to the legislative regulation, which is in force nowadays
  first of all within the civil law legal space. In particular, with the aim of answering, in a way, the
  question whether it is really obvious that the dogma of the autonomy of the will here is no longer
  the basis of the rules of contract. Brief comparative overview demonstrates that despite the
  significantly different viewpoints of the doctrines as to the basis of legal transaction, and above
  all, a contract, many legal systems of continental Europe do take a serious account of the subjective
  element and proceed openly or implicitly from the necessity that the internal will should
  correspond to its external expression. At the same time, within the contract law, in some cases it
  is being spoken of consensus and its vices. However, if consensus in such cases means nothing
  but agreement on the parties’ intentions, we are still dealing with the same subjective approach,
  based to a large extent upon the central idea of the old will theory and its modifications, attaching
  at least considerable degree of importance to the individual will.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 67; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: contracts
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: transactions
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: fictitious transactions
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sham transactions
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: simulation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: vices of will
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: “La Trahison des Images”: Intentional discrepancy between individual will and its declaration
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 04.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/44252/1/04.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 905,49 kB