title: Concept and special features of proving in notarial activities
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Pogosyan, Ekaterina V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-08-12T09:48:19Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-08-12T09:48:19Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Pogosyan, Ekaterina V. 2022. “Concept and special features of proving in notarial activities”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 1: 125–141.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.107
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/37342
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article examines some problems related to proof in notarial activities and substantiates
  the relevance of those provisions of legislation for strengthening the role of the notary in
  the process of proof by introducing categories of limits and standards in notarial activities.
  The establishment of limits of notarial proof increases the meaning of certain clauses of the
  agreement (what exactly was checked and proved by the notary) and serves as the basis for an
  adequate solution to the issue of evidentiary value of the notarial deed, reflecting the results
  of the explanatory and verification activities of the notary. In the subject of proof in notarial proceedings, it is proposed to include documents, information, and statements containing
  information on the presence or absence of certain facts of legal significance necessary for the
  performance of a notarial act. Examining certain provisions of notary legislation, the author
  concludes that there exists a presumption in the notarial process that should be understood as
  provisions according to which a particular fact is considered unproven if a significant violation
  of the notarial form is committed. Based on examples from judicial and notarial practice,
  it is concluded that the main task of legal regulation of the procedure of notarial proof is to
  create conditions for a comprehensive establishment by a notary of the circumstances that
  took place in the relationship between the parties to notarial proceedings in order to eliminate
  subjective factors associated with the peculiarities of perception of the same type of legal relationship
  by subjects with different levels of psychological perception.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 13; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: notary
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: proofs
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: proving
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: subject of proof
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: limits of proof
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: standard of proof
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: principles of proof
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Concept and special features of proving in notarial activities
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 07.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/37342/1/07.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 744,83 kB