title: On the question of speech portraits of political propagandists
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Milekhina, Tatiana A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-10-12T13:42:56Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-10-12T13:42:56Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Milekhina, T. A. (2021). On the question of speech portraits of political propagandists. Media Linguistics, 8 (3), 237–247.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2021.303
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33290
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Based on the analysis of the oral public speech of popular publicists (S. A. Mikheev and
  I. N. Panarin) working in electronic media and the Internet, the article attempts to characterize
  the stylistic and semantic originality of modern Russian pro-government propaganda.
  The dependence of the nature of the linguistic features of propaganda on such factors as the
  personality of the propagandist, the scope of his activities, and the nature of the transmission
  is established. It is shown that the personal qualities of Mikheev is conditioned by such features
  of his speech as emotionality, exceeding the permissible volume level, and careless pronunciation
  style, while Professor Panarin is characterized by an academic manner of speech
  with its inherent consideration of the opposite point of view, argumentation, and respect for
  the audience. It is claimed that the influence of the sphere of activity (Mikheev works in electronic
  media, such as Evening with Vladimir Solovyov, the radio program Iron Logic, Panarin
  conducts an analytical program Igor Panarin. World Politics on the YouTube channel) is found
  in taking into account the composition and request of the audience to which the propaganda
  is directed. Television discussion allows rudeness, verbal aggression, reduced vocabulary, political
  banter, logic of the absurd, direct insults, and threats to opponents. Analytical transmission
  involves the strategic forecasting of events filled with the metaphysics of propaganda, the
  creation of mythologies, the use of allegories, and hints. It is proved that despite the almost
  opposite stylistic format, the propaganda discourse of Mikheev and Panarina is characterized
  by common dominant semantic categories, such as traditional family values, religiosity, conservatism,
  protection of the interests of the state, humanistic maximalism, and the historical
  continuity of Russia.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Media Linguistics;Volume 8; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: speech portrait
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: speech behavior
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: stylistics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: semantics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: On the question of speech portraits of political propagandists
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 237-247.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/33290/1/237-247.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 625,82 kB