title: The ‘concentration of public elements’ theory and the arbitrability of disputes in Russia
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Skvortsov, Oleg Yu.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-04-20T17:41:50Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-04-20T17:41:50Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Skvortsov, Oleg Yu. 2021. “The ‘concentration of public elements’ theory and the arbitrability of disputes in Russia”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 1: 112–122.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.107
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/28065
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This article is devoted to the analysis of the theory of concentration of public elements. The
  author explains the causes of this theory and its influence on the arbitrability of disputes in
  Russia. The causes of this jurisdictional theory are illustrated in the development of substantive
  law. The work emphasizes that the two sectors of civil turnover regulation, which have
  developed in Russia, largely affect the formation of dispute resolution mechanisms. This also
  applies to the issue of determining the range of disputes that the arbitral tribunal is entitled to
  accept for its consideration. The author stresses that there are no norms in the legislation on
  which the theory of concentration of public elements is based. It is generated exclusively by judicial
  decisions, which are not always consistent. This is evidenced by the fact that, despite the
  precedent nature of one of the decisions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on
  the arbitrability of procurement disputes for the needs of certain types of legal entities, lower
  cassation courts refuse to recognize the arbitrability of this category of disputes. At the same
  time, they refer to the violation of public order when considering procurement disputes by
  arbitration courts. This is seen as some manipulation in which a conservative approach to the
  activities of arbitration courts is provided by the arbitrary involvement of various doctrines
  that have no basis in the law. The author predicts the negative consequences of the development
  of this doctrine, which will take place in the form of limiting the arbitrability of disputes
  considered by commercial arbitrations and in relation to other categories of cases in which a
  public element will be manifested to a greater or lesser extent.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 12; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: arbitration
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: commercial arbitration
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: concentration of public elements
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: arbitrability
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: court practice
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: internal arbitration
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: reform of arbitration
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The ‘concentration of public elements’ theory and the arbitrability of disputes in Russia
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 112-122.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/28065/1/112-122.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 631,09 kB