title: Unjustified enrichment and restitution in social security legal relations
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Sedelnikova, Marina G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Trutaeva, Anna V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-03-19T14:02:23Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-03-19T14:02:23Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2024
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Sedelnikova, Marina G., and Anna V. Trutaeva. 2024. “Unjustified enrichment and restitution in social security legal relations.” Russian Journal of Labour & Law 14: 358–372. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu32.2024.124 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu32.2024.124
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/45114
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article is devoted to the consideration of the grounds and prospects for the use of the
  mechanism of restitution in the law of social security. The authors argue that the industry has
  developed a need for a legal structure regulating cases of unjustified or excessive provision of social security to citizens. This thesis is illustrated by an analysis of current regulatory legal
  acts and emerging judicial practice. In resolving disputes of the category considered in the
  article, the courts took the path of borrowing a private law mechanism of restitution, which is
  generally supported by the authors. At the same time, the article focuses on the need to comply
  with the rules developed by science for borrowing private law structures by social security
  law, including ensuring the sectoral adaptation of the implemented legal instrument. In this
  regard, the authors draw attention to the position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian
  Federation, formulated in Resolution of 14.01.2016 no. 1-P. In the work, this position of the
  Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is regarded as focusing on a specific industry
  adaptation of the borrowed legal structure of restitution for the purposes of social security law.
  The authors emphasize that when the parties to the social security legal relationship return
  to the state preceding the violation of the law, it is necessary to formalize the distribution of
  the burden of adverse consequences of the error of the authorized body on the basis of the
  general legal principle of justice, excluding a formal approach to resolving the legal situation.
  This involves taking into account the specifics of the life situation in which the citizen is, the
  duration of the period during which he received the social payment assigned by mistake, as
  well as other significant circumstances.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Russian Journal of Labour & Law;Volume 14
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: restitution
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: unjust enrichment
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: social payment
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: social security
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: legal aid
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: adaptation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Unjustified enrichment and restitution in social security legal relations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 358-372.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/45114/1/358-372.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 646,45 kB