title: Structural Analysis of Economic Growth in China: International Comparison Context
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Sukharev, Oleg S.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Voronchikhina, Ekaterina N.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-02-06T15:54:16Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-02-06T15:54:16Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Sukharev O. S., Voronchikhina E. N. (2019) Structural Analysis of Economic Growth in China: International Comparison Context. St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 35, iss. 4, pp. 543–568.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2019.403
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17022
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The Chinese economy over the long term has shown relatively high average growth rates, even
  considering a gradual slowdown over the last several years. In this regard, it is important to identify
  features of this model and policies of economic growth in comparison with other countries.
  Purpose of this research is to conduct a structural analysis of the Chinese economic growth in
  comparison with the United States, Germany, Japan, and Russia, as well as to identify features
  of its structural dynamics and macroeconomic policy. The subject of investigation is models of
  economic growth in these countries, and approaches to macroeconomic growth policy in China
  and Russia that determine the contribution of GDP components and economic sectors to the
  rate of economic growth. The hypothesis is that the economy growth model is determined by
  the dominance of the components and sector in GDP. Three basic growth models are defined.
  The model based on the dominance of gross consumption in the USA and Russia, investment
  in China, and a mixed growth model in Germany and Japan. The Chinese economy is close to
  the “Schumpeterian” growth model. The Russian economy approximates the “Fisher” model,
  especially in terms of macroeconomic policy requirements. Therefore, to ensure the investment
  growth model, it is necessary, in addition to encouraging investments, to change the characteristics
  of structural dynamics, including change in macroeconomic policy instruments.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies;Volume 35; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: empirical analysis of growth
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: GDP structure by expenditure
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sectoral structure of the economy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: comparative analysis
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: model of economic growth
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Structural Analysis of Economic Growth in China: International Comparison Context
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 543_568.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17022/3/543_568.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 1,41 MB