title: Moral and applied theological issues of the implementation of constitutional freedoms of conscience and religion
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Mit’ko, August E.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-01-11T10:20:24Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-01-11T10:20:24Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Mit’ko A. E. Moral and applied theological issues of the implementation of constitutional freedoms of conscience and religion. Issues of Theology, 2021, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 581–587.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2021.410
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/34109
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This review examines the main directions of Konstantin Andreev’s, Candidate of Legal Sciences), analysis of modern Russian legislation on freedom of conscience and religious associations, as well as law enforcement practice in his monograph The right to believe in modern Russia (issues of implementing constitutional freedom of religion), which has become one of the few works on this topical issue. In addition, the review addresses issues that arise at the intersection of several research fields: philosophy, theology and law. The high level of the peer-reviewed research, its relevance, theoretical value, scientific significance, and the interdisciplinary nature of the research are noted. The review considers the impossibility of applying legislation in a unified format to different historical and cultural confessional trends. The author’s point of view regarding the implementation of religious constitutional freedoms is contemplated, and it provides possibilities for polemics with the author on the reasons for difficulties in the implementation of constitutional religious freedoms. The review deals with the problems of terminology and legislative regulation of some aspects of missionary activity in the context of the latest adopted federal regulations. The peculiarities of Andreev’s interpretation of the problem of “religious secrets” are pointed out. The value of the work for representatives of several branches of science is indicated.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Issues of Theology;Volume 3; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: religion
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: freedom of conscience
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: freedom of religion
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: state-confessional relations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: civil society
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: administrative law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: constitutional law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Moral and applied theological issues of the implementation of constitutional freedoms of conscience and religion
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 11_Серапион.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/34109/1/11_%d0%a1%d0%b5%d1%80%d0%b0%d0%bf%d0%b8%d0%be%d0%bd.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 599,33 kB