title: Chapter 5. Functional-pragmatic text analysis
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kuznetsov, Sergey A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Skrebtsova, Tatiana G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Suvorov, Sergey G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Klementyeva, Anna V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-12-02T10:35:44Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-12-02T10:35:44Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/9785288059278.06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/21182
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Drawing on Charles Bally’s distinction between dictum and modus, the final chapter
  deals with the pragmatic analysis of propositions identified at the previous step. Propositions can be expressed by an attribute linking together a number of objects or by a single
  word (implicit proposition). Implicit propositions should be made explicit, i.e. missing
  objects should be brought out. Each proposition is attributed a conceptual type. The authors posit four types of propositions, namely, fact, opinion, evaluation and expression
  of will. While the distinction between fact and opinion is common enough, evaluation
  emphasizes the emotional, or expressive, aspect of an utterance, and the expression of
  will has to do with persuasive speech acts. Next, relations between propositions, both
  local and distant, are established, which makes it possible to bring them together within
  a rhetorical text structure. The units of rhetorical structure are quite different from both
  the syntactic and communicative ones and vary depending on the its type (statement,
  persuasion, directive, etc.).
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: proposition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: fact
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: opinion
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: evaluation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: expression of will
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: rhetorical structure
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Chapter 5. Functional-pragmatic text analysis
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Book chapter
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 167-204.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/21182/1/167-204.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 726,36 kB