title: Old Russian metnoye pismo
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Tsypkin, Denis Olegovich
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-08-29T14:53:41Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-08-29T14:53:41Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Tsypkin D. O. Old Russian metnoye pismo. Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana, 2019, vol. 1 (25), pp. 124–135.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu19.2019.109
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16222
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The author discusses the classification of types of writing in the views of professional Russian scribes of the 16th–17th centuries. This classification included two basic types of professional writing: ustav or knizhnoe pis’mo (book writing) and skoropis’. There was also a certain kind of scrittura usuale termed “metnоe pis’mo” by the Russian bookmen. Ustav (“knizhnoe pis’mo”), skoropis’ and metnоe pis’mo were proper professional terms used in specialized books for calligraphers, in manuals and schoolbooks.
  The term “metnоe pis’mo” appears in the 1570ies – 1580ies. The terms “ustav” and “skoropis’” are attested in Western Russian documents from the 1540ies. In Muscovy the term “skoropis’” referring to the type of writing already existed by the 1570ies, but it may have appeared as early as the 1550ies. The term “ustav” is first encountered in a document dated to 1614.
  As far as the term “poluustav” is concerned, it is attested from the 1630ies and later. However, it did not mean a special type of writing. As may be proved by the contextual analysis, this term had different occasional usages. In the 17th century muscovite scribal milieu poluustav was a general term designating all forms of writing not properly coinciding with ustav. In some cases it meant some kind of nonconformity to the professional book writing (“knizhnoe pis’mo”) in function or in quality. In other cases it meant just writing in smaller scale in comparison to other manuscripts made in proper ustav.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The research is prepared with the support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant № 16-01-00210.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana;Volume 1 (25)
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Old Russian writing
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: metnоe pis’mo
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: scrittura usuale
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ustav
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: poluustav
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: skoropis’
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: paleography
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the study of historical writing
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Old Russian metnoye pismo
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 124-135.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16222/1/124-135.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 945,49 kB