title: Frames in educational practices
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Vasilkova, Valeriya V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Treukhova, Evgeniia O.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-01-28T11:09:35Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-01-28T11:09:35Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Vasilkova V. V., Treukhova E. O. Frames in educational practices. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 2018, vol. 11, issue 4, pp. 487–502.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/spbu12.2018.407
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15308
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article presents results of the study of students’ educational practices based on frame analysis.
  The authors note that frame analysis is characterized by a variety of ways of its empirical
  verification, and suggest their own version of how educational practices can be framed.
  We suggest that ideas about individuals’ life strategies can be used as the basis for choosing
  frames, since the attitude towards educational practices is largely determined by the expectations
  and ideas about the future. This is related to the ‘intermediate’ status of students, who are
  in the initial stage of their professional self-identification at the university. Such ideas may not
  exist as clearly formulated attitudes, but act as a hidden mechanism of motivation and social
  activity of a person (which is especially important for frame analysis). A system of indicators
  for framing educational practices has been developed, including relationships with classmates,
  communication with supervisors, the image of the university and the image of a future career.
  The research has been carried out using the semi-structured interview method. Interviews
  have been conducted with undergraduate students at the Faculty of Sociology at St. Petersburg
  State University. As a result, four main frames has been identified, which can be considered as
  a latent expression of a certain type of life strategy: ‘careerist-workaholic’ — the strategy for
  successful employment and career growth; ‘researcher’ — the strategy for further intellectual/
  academic activity; ‘curious erudite’ — the strategy for communication, gaining a wide range of
  knowledge; ‘transit’ — the strategy for avoiding choosing a life strategy in the near future. The
  most frequently occurring frames are the ‘researcher’ and the ‘careerist-workaholic’, which can
  be explained by the specifics of the level of education of the respondents.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Sociology;Volume 11; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: frame
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: frame analysis
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: educational practices
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: life strategies
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: educational competencies
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Frames in educational practices
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 07-Vasilkova.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15308/1/07-Vasilkova.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 655,32 kB