title: The language of evaluation: What the evaluation says about the evaluator
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Nefedov, Sergey T.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-03-24T10:52:08Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-03-24T10:52:08Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Nefedov S. T. The language of evaluation: What the evaluation says about the evaluator. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2022, 19 (4): 821–838. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2022.410 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2022.410
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/39411
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The language of evaluation as a subsystem of linguistic means with special pragmatic functions
  is examined in the context of scientific communication on an interpersonal and personal levels. On the one hand, the role of the evaluation language in reflecting social relationships
  in the scientific field is emphasized, and on the other hand, the individual characteristics of
  researchers in establishing professional relationships with their colleagues. It is shown how the
  participants in the scientific discourse construct their professional identity through the choice
  of certain types of evaluation resources. Four types of means of evaluation are the focus of
  consideration, which are central to the evaluative qualification and the evaluative positioning
  in scientific discourse: evaluative lexemes, modal epistemic words, means of authorization and
  emphasizing metatextual structures with predicates of mental information processing. It has
  been noted that different researchers use the same means of evaluation in different ways. The
  different use of evaluative language can be explained by individual preferences when choosing
  pragmatic strategies for conducting scientific discussions with other researchers. Accordingly,
  general professional profiles of the authors of the analyzed articles are distinguished, which
  reflect their typical language behavior models in interaction with potential communication
  partners. The description of the profiles is operationalized by metaphorical terms scientistdebater,
  scientist-diplomat, scientist-didactician. The theoretical articles by three German linguists,
  who are well-known and authoritative experts in their field, serve as empirical material
  for the analysis. The methodology is based on the theoretical foundations of language pragmatics,
  interactional sociolinguistics and discourse analysis.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The study was prepared with the support of the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 22-28-
  01024 “Evaluation language in scholarly humanities practices and discourses of Germany and Russia”) at
  St Petersburg State University.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 19; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: language of evaluation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: linguistic discourse
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: research article
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: personal level of evaluation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: boosting of scientific formulation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The language of evaluation: What the evaluation says about the evaluator
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 10.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/39411/1/10.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 703,54 kB