title: The element of fault in Roman private law
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Jhering, Rudolf
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-08-24T10:53:08Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-08-24T10:53:08Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Jhering, Rudolf. 2023. The element of fault in Roman private law. Pravovedenie 67 (2): 216–257. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.205 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.205
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/43871
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: R. von Jhering’s 1867 work Das Schuldmoment im römischen Privatrecht, translated hereby
  into Russian, is still recommended in basic textbooks on German civil law marked “grundlegend”,
  which means “fundamental”. And indeed, despite the significant complication of the legal
  material on this issue since its publication, the work contains fundamental ideas from which one
  can depart in various directions, but which it is absolutely impossible and unacceptable for an
  educated lawyer to pass by. From a didactic point of view, the work is remarkable in terms of
  the accessibility of the language, the clarity of ideas and the illustrative nature of the material
  supporting them. The work of R. von Jhering, despite its relative brevity, is a full-fledged study
  and, undoubtedly, is one of the outstanding monuments of legal scholarship not only of the 19th
  century and Germany alone, but of all time for the whole world. It shows the path that the legal
  system must overcome from the unsophisticated ancient legal forms to an impartial assessment
  of what causes the greatest irritation in any person — the wrong committed against him.
  What is fundamentally important in the work is not that R. von Jhering explained what was already
  known, but how this work can help not to lose such important ethical values as the principle
  of guilt, proportionality of punishment, individual assessment of behavior on the further path
  of development. And much more. It seems that many readers, after reading the work, realize
  that their ideas about civil liability are much closer to Ihering’s description of ancient law, since
  the guilt component often goes far into the background compared to the idea that the injured
  person should be restored in property terms.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 67; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: fault
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: private liability
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: damages
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: tort
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: punishment
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The element of fault in Roman private law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 05.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/43871/1/05.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 810 kB