title: Concepts of limitation periods in UK and US law
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Malysheva, Veronika G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-06-24T21:10:38Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-06-24T21:10:38Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Malysheva, Veronika G. 2020. Concepts of limitation periods in UK and US law. Pravovedenie 64 (4): 483–495.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2020.403
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/36977
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In the article the author analyzes the statute of limitations under Russian law and the law of
  Great Britain and the USA. The current legal regulation of limitation periods in Russia is based
  simultaneously on two mutually exclusive concepts: on the one hand, the Civil Code of the Russian
  Federation indicates that the application of limitation periods prescribes that the fact of
  violation of a right and the determination of the person who violated this right must be established,
  on the other hand, the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration
  Procedural Code of the Russian Federation provide for the possibility of terminating legal proceedings without examining the merits of the case and without examining the evidence.
  While each of these concepts is obviously acceptable, the combination of various tasks within
  the framework of one institution demonstrates the inconsistency of legislative regulation. In this
  regard, the study of other countries’ experience concerning the purpose of the institution is of
  particular importance. A comparative legal analysis carried out by the author illustrates that the
  law lacks a unified concept and ideology of a mechanism providing for the refusal to resolve
  a dispute in judicial proceedings due to the expiration of a certain period of time. In the law of
  Great Britain and the USA, there exist several mechanisms of limitation, each of which is based
  on certain principles and operates according to its own rules. In the framework of this article,
  the author attempts a comprehensive comparative legal analysis of the statute of limitations in
  order to provide a basis for finding an answer to the question concerning the legal nature of the
  modern institute of limitation in Russian law.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 64; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: statute of limitations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: limitation periods
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: defendant’s remedy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: exception
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: institute of prescription
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: right to claim
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Concepts of limitation periods in UK and US law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 3.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/36977/1/3.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 791,51 kB