title: Kant and the “New Brain Line” of Akim Volynsky
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Matveychev, Oleg A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-12-03T17:58:08Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-12-03T17:58:08Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2024-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Matveychev O. A. Kant and the “New Brain Line” of Akim Volynsky. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2024, vol. 40, issue 2, pp. 201–210. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2024.202 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2024.202
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/48101
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article treats the specific reception of I. Kant’s ideas by an eminent Russian philosopher,
  literary critic and art critic at the turn of the 19th–20th century Akim L. Volynsky. Unlike
  G. W. F. Hegel and F. W. J. Schelling, I. Kant did not enjoy popularity in Russia until the very
  end of the 19th century. The appearance of A. L. Volynsky’s work ‘Critical and Dogmatic Elements
  in Kant’s Philosophy’ (1889) became an important event in Russian cultural life. In
  this article A. L. Volynsky announced the inevitability of “the power of religious belief over all
  questions of life.” In so doing, he had set vector of the development of literature, philosophy
  and social consciousness in Russia and prepared a religious and philosophical renaissance of the turn of the century. I. Kant’s philosophy, which stands against dogmatism in thought and
  also establishes unbendable moral values, became a worldview ground for A. L. Volynsky in
  his struggle with Positivism, atheism and Utilitarianism that dominated over the society and
  literature at the time. However, his enthusiasm was not appreciated by his contemporaries —
  representatives of the Silver Age of Russian culture, among whom F. Nietzsche began to come
  into vogue. A. L. Volynsky was not a pioneer of Russian Kantianism. His article on Kant had
  only an indirect influence on his contemporaries. However, it was the first sign of Russian
  Kantian studies, ahead of the works by A. I. Vvedensky, V. S. Solovyov, I. I. Lapshin, N. Ya. Grot,
  F. A. Stepun, and others.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 40; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: history of philosophy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: philosophy of Kant
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russian philosophy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Silver Age of Russian culture
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Akim Volynsky
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Kant and the “New Brain Line” of Akim Volynsky
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 2024+(2),2.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/48101/1/2024%2b%282%29%2c2.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 603,83 kB