title: Chinese system of accessory to crime as a monistic system
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Liu, Ming Xiang
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2018-12-18T16:31:25Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2018-12-18T16:31:25Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Liu, Ming Xiang. 2018. “Chinese system of accessory to crime as a monistic system”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 4: 584–592.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/spbu14.2018.409
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15153
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In Criminal Law are identified two systems of complicity in crime: differentiated and monistic.
  The first one is accepted in such countries as Germany, Switzerland, France, Spain,
  Netherlands, Japan and some others. The system of complicity is used in such countries as
  Austria, Norway, Denmark, Italy, Sweden, Brazil, the countries of the former Soviet Union, the
  Czech Republic, etc. Today, most Chinese researchers claim that PRC has adopted a dualistic
  system of participation that distinguishes between performing and complicity — so called,
  “differentiated system”. There are certain grounds for such a conclusion in the provisions of
  the Criminal Code of the PRC, but they should not be interpreted unambiguously against the
  monistic system. At the same time, some scientists believe that the Chinese Criminal Law
  adopted a monistic system of participation or a system of a single performer — a uniform system.
  The legal grounds for this conclusion can also be found in the provisions of the Criminal
  Code of the PRC. To compare the two systems in the study, examples are given from some
  Criminal Laws, including consideration of different forms of complicity and roles of accessory
  to crimes. According to the author, the Chinese Criminal Law does not realise a dualistic system
  of participation that distinguishes between performance and complicity. Our arguments
  in favor of this position are presented in this comparative legal and critical study. This study
  is providing for the first time. For this, in particular, the interpretation of the provisions of the Criminal Code of the PRC, as well as examples of hypothetical crimes and the qualification of
  the actions of the persons participating in them are given.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 9; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Chinese Criminal Law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Criminal Code of the PRC
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: accessory to crime
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: differentiated system of accessory to a crime
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the monistic system of accessory to a crime
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Chinese system of accessory to crime as a monistic system
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 09-Liu Ming Xiang.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15153/1/09-Liu%20Ming%20Xiang.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 711,95 kB