title: THE PROBLEM OF A PRIORI IN FUNDAMENTAL ONTOLOGY: A PRIORI PERFECT AND THE EXISTENTIAL-TEMPORAL CONCEPT OF PHILOSOPHY
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: VAVILOV, ANTON
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-07-07T13:09:33Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-07-07T13:09:33Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: VAVILOV A. THE PROBLEM OF A PRIORI IN FUNDAMENTAL ONTOLOGY: A PRIORI PERFECT AND THE EXISTENTIAL-TEMPORAL CONCEPT OF PHILOSOPHY. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2022, vol. 11 issue 1, pp. 141–169.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-141-169
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/37081
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Based on the philosophy of Martin Heidegger the article presents the possibility of actualizing Heidegger’s
  main question about the meaning of Being in the context of the analysis of so-called “a priori
  perfect.” During the development of fundamental ontology in the second half of the 1920s, Heidegger
  ponders the approach to Being in the history of philosophy and identifies such a feature of Being as a
  priori, a kind of antecedence of Being in relation to being. Although tradition invariably understands
  Being in this way, in it, according to Heidegger, the question is no longer raised either about the sense
  of such antecedence, or about the temporal basis of this sense, and therefore a priori as the essential
  character of Being is left in total oblivion. We suggest that it is the problematization of apriority in its
  temporal origin that can contribute to resolving Heidegger’s fundamental philosophical question of
  time as the transcendental horizon of any concept of Being that precedes being. In this precedence
  there is a cherished temporal moment, the comprehension of which allows us to develop the “basic
  question of metaphysics” about the relationship of Being and time in a more concrete way than Heidegger’s
  four main themes of the question of Being: the ontological difference; the basic articulation
  of Being (essentia/existentia); the truth-character of Being; the possible modifications of Being and the
  unity of Being’s variety. Revealing a priori question as the central question of all Heideggers thinking
  before the “Turn” we attempt to update this question and justify the need for its renewal on the basis of
  a fundamental ontology. With this task we relate the question of the essence of philosophy in general
  in its existential-temporal concept since philosophy appears as a temporality-based possible of the
  questioning return to the “earlier”: to the essential structures of being, knowledge, Being, Dasein. Our analysis is based on the following decisions: (1) Being in relation to being is always pre-understood as
  “earlier,” and in this understanding a temporal definition operates, hence the main question of fundamental
  ontology about the relation of Being and time can be developed or at least clarified through the
  problem of meaning of a priori. (2) The question of the meaning of the “earlier” and of the temporal
  basis for understanding Being as “earlier,” a priori, is concretized into the question of the conditions
  for the possibility of any ontology, including the fundamental ontology, which raises the question of
  the earlier in relation to Being and therefore “lives” in the light of the understanding of the “earlier” as
  such. (3) This reflexive foundation of the fundamental ontology from itself is a necessary stage on the
  way of developing its project, if we remember that the main “duty” of the philosopher is to clarify “our
  inner nature” for the sake of opening the boundaries and conditions of the possibility of philosophy.
  The conclusion is that the possibilities of fundamental ontology in making sense of Being, time, and
  philosophy in general are far from exhausted, but await the questions that actualize them and new
  readings that allow to see the hidden richness of Heidegger’s thought.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 11; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: a priori
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: perfect
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: questioning
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ontology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: fundamental ontology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Being
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: time
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Dasein
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Heidegger
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: THE PROBLEM OF A PRIORI IN FUNDAMENTAL ONTOLOGY: A PRIORI PERFECT AND THE EXISTENTIAL-TEMPORAL CONCEPT OF PHILOSOPHY
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 07_Vavilov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/37081/1/07_Vavilov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 743,96 kB