title: Voprosy filosofii in the context of 1990s-era Russian philosophical journals
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: DeBlasio, Alyssa
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2017-12-17T11:09:29Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2017-12-17T11:09:29Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2017-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: DeBlasio A. Voprosy filosofii in the context of 1990s-era Russian philosophical journals. Vestnik SPbSU. Philosophy and Conflict studies, 2017, vol. 33, issue 4, pp. 436–445.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.405
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/8774
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article provides an analysis of the journal Voprosy filosofii in the era of the 1990s. This
  journal is compared with other philosophical journals published in Russia at that time. While it is
  methodologically problematic to do a one-to-one comparison of 1990s issues of Voprosy filosofii
  and independent philosophy journals, a comparison of the two can offer some interesting (but not
  unexpected) conclusions. What is interesting about the data from Voprosy filosofii is not what it tells
  us about Voprosy filosofii itself, but how it can help us better appreciate the diversity among 1990s
  independent philosophical journals. Some of these journals published mostly scholarly texts; others
  included high percentages of historical texts and translations. However, most saw themselves as
  new vehicles for a new discipline. They crafted distinctive intellectual identities for themselves, be it
  underground philosophy in St. Petersburg (Stupeni), phenomenology (Logos), the history of Russian
  philosophy (Nachala), or post-structuralism and postmodernism (Paralleli). Voprosy filosofii too
  reacted to the new intellectual freedoms of the early 1990s, but its reaction was tempered by the fact
  that it was a professional philosophical journal with a long history and, thus, far less flexibility in form
  and content. Perhaps this is why independent philosophical journals made such a splash in the early
  1990s, and perhaps this is why most of them would cease to exist by the time the new millennium hit.
  Refs 4. Tabl. 5.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 33; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Voprosy filosofii
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russian philosophy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: philosophical journals
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: 1990s-era
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Voprosy filosofii in the context of 1990s-era Russian philosophical journals
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 05-DeBlasio.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/8774/1/05-DeBlasio.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 636,58 kB