title: Discussions about technological sovereignty: Analyzing conceptual differences and justification strategies
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Tomin, Leonid V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-06-23T16:47:35Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-06-23T16:47:35Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Tomin L. V. Discussions about technological sovereignty: Analyzing conceptual differences and justification strategies. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 2023, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 22–35. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2023.102 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2023.102
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/41676
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The paper is devoted to the study of conceptual differences in the interpretation of the concept —
  “technological sovereignty”. In recent years, many states have proclaimed the achievement of
  technological sovereignty as a strategic priority and one of the goals of long-term development.
  At the same time, in the scientific literature on this topic, in the presence of review publications and
  case studies, there is a lack of analysis of conceptual differences. In strategic documents, state
  concepts and public discourse, the articulation of the concept of “sovereignty” in the technological
  sphere varies from a variant close to autarky in meaning to a policy of maintaining a competitive
  environment and diversifying foreign suppliers of critical technologies. As a methodological
  basis for the study, we chose the concept of problematics developed within the framework of the
  French tradition of historical epistemology (J. Martin, L. Althusser, D. Lecourt). Its toolkit makes it possible to explicate the internal structure and interconnection of concepts within the framework
  of individual interpretations and the logic of justification strategies in public policy. On the example
  of the European Union, a new interpretation of sovereignty as an agency was demonstrated,
  in addition, its connection with the postulates of German ordoliberalism was investigated. The
  cases of Brazil and India represent two different models for justifying the policy of technological
  sovereignty in the context of understanding center-periphery relations in the global economy and
  postcolonialism.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: This paper was supported by the Expert Institute for Social Research, project “Evidence-based
  policy of technological sovereignty and trust: a study of public justification strategies”.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Political Expertise: POLITEX;Volume 19; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sovereignty
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: technologies
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: competition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: nationalism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ideology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: identity narrative
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Discussions about technological sovereignty: Analyzing conceptual differences and justification strategies
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 16236-Article Text-55307-1-10-20230615.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/41676/1/16236-Article%20Text-55307-1-10-20230615.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 717,37 kB