title: THE REFERENTIAL POTENTIAL OF NOUN GROUPS FORMED BY THE BULGARIAN INDEFINITE PRONOUNS AND THE PROPER NAME
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Lazareva, Viktoria A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-03-03T16:59:21Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-03-03T16:59:21Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/9785288063183.11
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/39267
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article explores the referential potential of noun groups formed by the Bulgarian
  indefinite pronouns някой/някакъв (си) and the proper name. The study is based on authentic linguistic data from Bulgarian National Corpus and partly from other internet-
  sources. The linguistic data classified according to E. V. Paducheva’s classification of
  reference classes of noun groups. The referential approach allows all possible uses of
  noun groups to be described. There are only isolated observations on combinations of
  indefinite pronouns with proper names, which can be supplemented and reinterpreted
  according to specific research tasks. We are interested in the ability of indefinite pronouns
  to combine with different components of the meaning of the proper names. We
  show that: 1) the compatibility of a proper name with indicators of indeterminacy is not
  a rare or isolated case, but a systemic functioning; 2) the referential variation of the noun
  groups някой/някакъв (си) + proper name is due to the complex interaction between the
  semantics of indefinite pronouns and the proper name, which involves the denotative
  and significative components of the name’s semantics; 3) the proper names in combination
  with някой/някакъв (си) cover a wide spectrum of variability, revealing a predisposition
  to both referential and non-referential, as well as to predicate uses. In combination
  with indeterminatives, a proper name can realise its main functions as a linguistic sign:
  a) to act as a ‘code’ for an object; b) to identify an object; c) to characterise an object. We
  discuss ways of solving homonymy of different types of referential uses. Refs 22.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: St. Petersburg University Studies in Social Sciences & Humanities;Volume 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: proper name
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: indefinite pronoun
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Bulgarian
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: referentiality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: semantics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: THE REFERENTIAL POTENTIAL OF NOUN GROUPS FORMED BY THE BULGARIAN INDEFINITE PRONOUNS AND THE PROPER NAME
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 150-165.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/39267/1/150-165.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 797,99 kB