title: Typographical markers of emotionality used in expression of expert evaluation in German and Russian reviews in Linguistics
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kondratenko, Polina I.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-02-13T10:06:33Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-02-13T10:06:33Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Kondratenko P. I. Typographical markers of emotionality used in expression of expert evaluation in German and Russian reviews in Linguistics. German Philology in St Petersburg State University, 2022, iss. 12, pp. 102–115. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu33.2022.105 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu33.2022.105
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/39085
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This article explores the involvement of typographical means in the construction
  of evaluative meanings in expert scientific discourses. A qualitative context-semantic,
  axiological, and grapholinguistic analysis was carried out on the basis of 50 German
  and 50 Russian reviews in linguistics published in the period from 2016 to 2020 in
  high-ranking academic journals: Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik, Zeitschrift
  für Rezensionen, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, Problems of Onomastics, Russian
  Journal of Linguistics, and Topics in the study of language. During the course of the
  study, typographical emotionality markers used by the authors of linguistic reviews
  were identified and classified. Conclusions are drawn regarding the involvement of
  the selected units in the typical evaluation strategies in linguistic reviews. Particular
  attention is paid to cases of communicative-functional transposition of visual-graphic
  emotionality markers. The prospects for future research include an investigation of a
  wider number of reviews chosen for the corpus in order to collect statistical data for a
  quantitative comparative analysis of typographically marked expert-evaluative statements.
  The novelty of the study is in the discussion of typographical means relevant
  for the texts that ensure effective professional communication in academia. The means
  of this nature are still insufficiently covered in the publications of Russian researchers.
  The results presented in this paper can contribute to the further study of the text types
  of scientific discourse in an interlingual and intercultural perspective and particularly
  to the study of the interaction of linguistic and typographical features used to construct
  an author’s identity in context.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The study was prepared with the support of the Russian Science Foundation
  (project 22-28-01024 “Evaluation language in scholarly humanities practices and discourses
  of Germany and Russia”) at the St Petersburg State University.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: German Philology in St Petersburg State University;Issue 12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: typographical markers
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: emotionality markers
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: expert evaluation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: scientific discourse
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: German linguistic review
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russian linguistic review
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Typographical markers of emotionality used in expression of expert evaluation in German and Russian reviews in Linguistics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 102-115.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/39085/1/102-115.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 650,7 kB