title: THE PREFACE TO THE TRANSLATION OF A TYPESCRIPT OF MARTIN HEIDEGGER’S TALK “BEING-THERE AND BEING-TRUE ACCORDING TO ARISTOTLE”
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: CHOUFRINE, ARKADI
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-07-08T10:44:15Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-07-08T10:44:15Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: CHOUFRINE A. THE PREFACE TO THE TRANSLATION OF A TYPESCRIPT OF MARTIN HEIDEGGER’S TALK “BEING-THERE AND BEING-TRUE ACCORDING TO ARISTOTLE”. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2020, vol. 9, issue 1, pp. 306–323.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-1-306-323
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/18580
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Heidegger’s Cologne address of 1924 is important in at least three respects. First, it represents the next
  stage in the genesis of Being and Time after the seminal text known as Natorp Bericht (1922). Second, it
  manifests a new landmark in Heidegger’s rethinking appropriation of Aristotle’s thought. This new synthesis
  includes, in particular, the groundwork on Aristotle’s Rhetoric from the summer course of 1924.
  The annotations to the translation,—based on the texts from 1922–1924,—bring to light Heidegger’s
  working his way to this synthesis. The preface specifically uncovers Heidegger’s reading of Aristotle’s
  doctrine of the “mean” and compares Heidegger’s interpretation of Aristotle concept of ethical decision
  to an interpretation of it typical of modern Aristotle scholarship belonging to analytical tradition. Third,
  the Cologne address represents Heidegger’s first thematic approach to the question of the essence of
  truth (which even after Being and Time for at least a decade remained among his guiding threads). In
  particular, it develops the thesis (barely outlined in Natorp Bericht) that (contrary to the dominant view
  which Daniel Dahlstrom appropriately dubbed “the logical prejudice”) the proper “place” of truth is not
  judgement, but the being indicated in a judgement by the copula and in a human act by the goodness
  that motivates it; and that speech, for the most part, conceals the truth originally sighted.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 9; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: logical prejudice
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: idle talk
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the Nicomachean Ethics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the doctrine of the mean
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the situation of choice
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Albert Leo Schlageter
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: THE PREFACE TO THE TRANSLATION OF A TYPESCRIPT OF MARTIN HEIDEGGER’S TALK “BEING-THERE AND BEING-TRUE ACCORDING TO ARISTOTLE”
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 306-323.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/18580/1/306-323.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 658,64 kB