title: HUSSERL’S LANGUAGE OF NEUTRALITY
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: CARBONE, GUELFO
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-01-27T12:53:33Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-01-27T12:53:33Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: CARBONE G. HUSSERL’S LANGUAGE OF NEUTRALITY. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2022, vol. 11 issue 2, pp. 517–543.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-2-517-543
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38908
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Husserl intended the phenomenological method as a new beginning for philosophy. The epoché, the key
  notion of this method, entails a modification of attitude such that it can completely cancel and disempower
  all that might be given to us and that might be used for philosophical inquiry. In Ideas I, in particular,
  this is addressed as the “neutrality modification,” and defined as a universal modification of consciousness
  that permeates the phenomenological attitude. Neutralization, along with the method, is described
  by relying on what Husserl calls the “language of neutrality,” which is actually spoken while investigating
  in the phenomenological attitude, enacted in the descriptions, and also discloses a series of rather peculiar
  acts that must be performed in order to obtain the phenomenological attitude. This paper discusses the
  phenomenological language of neutrality, first presenting what “neutrality” means, as well as illustrating
  the essential expressions of this peculiar language (such as “to put out of action,” “to bracket,” “to suspend,”
  and so on), then situating it in the context of phenomenological analyses, particularly as regards those
  devoted to phantasy experiences. Finally, going back to early interpretations of Husserl’s transcendental
  philosophy, notably the critical readings provided by Levinas and Fink, some key features of the method
  of epoché are pointed out, suggesting that the study of the specific neutrality involved in the latter can contribute
  to answering the question of what kind of act epoché is, and if it can even be considered an act at all.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 11; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Edmund Husserl
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: phenomenology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: methodology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: epoché
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: neutrality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: phantasy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: language
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: HUSSERL’S LANGUAGE OF NEUTRALITY
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 02_Carbone.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/38908/1/02_Carbone.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 684,52 kB