title: A new approach to the enigmatic language of Kurbskij and its seeming “anomalies”
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Bounatirou, Elias Moncef
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-09-03T19:19:14Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-09-03T19:19:14Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Bounatirou E. M. A new approach to the enigmatic language of Kurbskij and its seeming “anomalies”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2021, 18 (1): 37–55.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2021.103
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33057
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In 2018, the author published a two-volume monograph in German entitled “Eine Syntax
  des ‘Novyj Margarit’ des A. M. Kurbskij. Philologisch-dependenzgrammatische Analysen zu
  einem kirchenslavischen Übersetzungskorpus” (“A Syntax of A. M. Kurbskij’s ‘Novyj Margarit’.
  A Philological and Dependency-grammatical Study of a Corpus of Church Slavonic Translations”).
  This article presents some results of the study in Russian and extends and complements
  the analysis begun in the monograph. The article focuses on the remarkable use of deverbal
  formations with the suffixes *‑m‑ and *‑n‑ having the meaning of passive necessity such as in до просвещаемы(х)/ad illuminandos ‘to those who have to be enlightened’. It is shown that
  the phenomenon in question, which can be observed in the Church Slavonic texts by Prince
  Andrei Kurbskij (1528–1583), should not be considered to be linguistically erroneous, as in
  the past. The fact that the use of the two formations mentioned is repeated in the same text and
  that examples of this phenomenon occur in different works by different authors suggests that
  it reflects a usage with a certain tradition. Consequently, the necessitative use of the deverbal
  suffixations has to be regarded as correct. In addition, a more systematic analysis makes it possible
  to show that a considerable number of other linguistic “anomalies” in Kurbskij’s works do
  not actually represent “anomalies”, or at least they are not linguistic errors of Kurbskij’s.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 18; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Аndrei Kurbskij
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: deverbal suffixations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Church Slavonic
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: alleged errors
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: language norms
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: A new approach to the enigmatic language of Kurbskij and its seeming “anomalies”
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 37-55.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/33057/1/37-55.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 836,38 kB