title: The creation of China’s lenient punishments for those confessing to their crimes and accepting punishments in criminal cases and its theoretical reflection
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Zehua, Lyu
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-08-25T13:45:10Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-08-25T13:45:10Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Zehua Lyu. 2021. “The creation of China’s lenient punishments for those confessing to their crimes and accepting punishments in criminal cases and its theoretical reflection”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 2: 401–418.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.210
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/32961
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The reform to improve the system of admitting guilt and accepting punishment for leniency is
  one of the important measures to “promote the reform of the jury-centered litigation system”,
  which is parallel to the substantial reform of court hearings. After pilot reform, it was finally
  confirmed by legislation. From the perspective of legislative norms, the leniency system of
  confession to a crime and acceptance of punishment includes basic principles, applicable
  standards for confession and acceptance of punishment, procedural norms and a system for
  the protection of rights. From the analysis of its nature, it is a diversion mechanism of criminal
  procedure, rather than a plea-bargaining system, which mainly implements the statutory
  penalty and is supplemented by the application of discretion and also embodies voluntary
  confession and other Chinese characteristics. The reform to the leniency system of admitting
  to a crime and accepting punishment contributed to the development of the conceptual
  and theoretical system of the leniency system and formed a series of theoretical systems for
  pleading guilty with Chinese characteristics: the generation of the penalty theory of postcrime
  behavior, a balance of justice and efficiency of the program from a simple theory, and
  the development of the effective defense system in China. It is particularly noteworthy that
  the system of admitting guilt and accepting punishment for leniency in China is a sentencing
  negotiation system rather than a conviction negotiation system.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 12; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Сhina
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: reform
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: guilt
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: punishment
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: leniency
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: voluntary
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: plea bargain
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The creation of China’s lenient punishments for those confessing to their crimes and accepting punishments in criminal cases and its theoretical reflection
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 401-418.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/32961/1/401-418.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 705,23 kB