title: THE CONTRASTIVE RHETORIC OF METADISCOURSE MARKERS IN L1 AND L2 RESEARCH PAPERS: A CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON OF ABSTRACTS AND DISCUSSION SECTIONS OF MEDICAL RESEARCH PAPERS
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Grigoriev, Ivan V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Rubtsova, Svetlana Yu.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-05-25T18:51:20Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-05-25T18:51:20Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2782-1943.2022.17
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/41517
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Most researchers find themselves in a very competitive surrounding and are
  supposed to be published continuously in prestigious peer-reviewed journals.
  However, the norms adopted by the local academic communities may differ
  from the norms adopted by the international academic communities. Differences
  have various causes and often include metadiscoursal textual features.
  The vast majority of the research in metadiscourse basically follow the model
  proposed by K. Hyland in 2005. To analyze the distribution of metadiscourse
  markers, four corpora were created: two corpora representing medical cardiology
  texts written in English by L2 Russian researchers (abstract and discussion
  section corpora) and two corpora representing English medical texts
  written by L1 English researchers. The results suggest that interactive metadiscourse
  markers for sequencing, announcing goals and indicating the nature of
  a given statement (evidentials) are more frequent in both L1 English abstracts
  and discussion sections than in their L2 English counterparts. The findings of
  this study have important pedagogical implications, especially for classes in
  English for Specific Purposes, English for Academic Purposes, and English for
  Research Publication Purposes.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Synergy of Languages & Cultures 2022: Interdiscipilinary Studies;
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: contrastive rhetoric
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: metadiscourse markers
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: disciplinary community
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: THE CONTRASTIVE RHETORIC OF METADISCOURSE MARKERS IN L1 AND L2 RESEARCH PAPERS: A CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON OF ABSTRACTS AND DISCUSSION SECTIONS OF MEDICAL RESEARCH PAPERS
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 211-227.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/41517/1/211-227.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 637,03 kB