title: What Can Possibly Integrate Us?
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Ilyin, Mikhail V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-11-26T20:30:30Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-11-26T20:30:30Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Ilyin M. V. What Can Possibly Integrate Us? Political Expertise: POLITEX, 2019, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 7–16.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu23.2019.101
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16672
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Both the profession of political science and our professional community remain highly fragmented
  despite all the recent advances. The article reviews and suggests ways to overcome this situation
  and achieve greater cohesion. A clearer distinction between politics and its environment as well
  as a more consistent use of advanced research methods may help. Specific methods modelled
  for the subject of study are relatively developed in political science. In addition to them, the paper
  considers the usage of transdisciplinary methods in political studies. They are the metretic
  (quantitative) methods, which developed from the basic biological ability to rate sensations and
  to measure respective information into methods of data generation and calculus, the morphetic
  (configurational) methods, which developed from the basic cognitive ability to recognize patterns
  and to single out types of phenomena into morphological and comparative methods, and the semiotic
  methods, which developed from the basic human ability to assign meanings into elaborate
  methods of analysis and interpretation. An appropriate interface for the subject matter and the
  methodological techniques appears to be found in social semiotics. It integrates various aspects
  of life as modes of human interaction through providing a multimodal approach. It also uses semiotics
  for combining transdisciplinary and specific methods. The author's conclusions are based
  on the assumption that many generations of people distinguish politics as a particular aspect
  of their lives, while implying definite, yet often different meanings. Synthesizing these different meanings, the author and colleagues at the Center for Advanced Methodologies of Social and
  Humanitarian Research, the Institute of Scientific Information in Social Science, RAS, propose
  new epistemological procedures and scientific methods for the implementation of the task of finding
  a consensus around the main themes and categories of politics. The main conclusion should
  be recognized to be the call to unite researchers who share the fundamental principles discussed
  in the current paper, which are technically based on a common set of methodologies, techniques,
  and instrumental approaches, while cognitively being based on the need of organizing and reorganizing
  the consciousness and the paradigm of the thinking.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The study was carried out with a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (project
  No. 17‑18‑01536). The theme of the project “Knowledge Transfer and Convergence of Methodological
  Traditions: Experience of Interdisciplinary Integration of Political, Biological and Linguistic”.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Political Expertise: POLITEX;Volume 15; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: political science
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: subject matter and method
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: transdisciplinary methods
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: metretics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: morphetics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: semiotics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: social semiotics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: multimodal approach
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: What Can Possibly Integrate Us?
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 7-16.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16672/1/7-16.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 658,32 kB