title: Compensation for harm resulting from the usage of a building: Сomparative analysis of Russian and Chinese law
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Erbakhaev, Evgeniy A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kratenko, Maxim V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-08-25T13:59:55Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-08-25T13:59:55Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Erbakhaev, Evgeniy A., Maxim V. Kratenko. 2021. “Compensation for harm resulting from the usage of a building: Сomparative analysis of Russian and Chinese law”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 2: 455–476.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.213
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/32964
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article examines the problem of compensation for harm caused in the process of using a
  building and structure. Attention is paid to the side of the defendant in relation to apartment
  buildings and non-residential buildings, the distribution of liability in the case of a plurality of
  tortfeasors, the regulation of third-party liability issues by the contract. A comparative analysis
  of the legislation of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China regulating
  the liability of building’s owners (users) and contractors involved in the maintenance of a
  building as well as court practice is conducted. The choice of the Chinese legal system is due
  to the presence of special rules in Tort Liability Law of China (2009). According to the results
  of the study, the authors have formulated a number of proposals, in particular: to unify the legal
  regime for residential and non-residential buildings for the purposes of compensation for
  harm caused to third parties; to differentiate the liability for harm caused by the destruction of
  a building (its structural components) and damage due to items falling out from the building
  (snow or ice falling from the roof, falling advertising designs, objects being thrown out of the
  building, etc.), to allow the contractual regulation of owner’s liability provided that the victim
  is given the right to choose the defendant (the building’s owner or the maintenance company,
  the contractor involved). The authors also argue in favor of a codified act as a source of tort
  law, which will ensure consistent regulation of the studied relations.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 12; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: tort liability
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: building
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: structure
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: collapse
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: fallen object
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: maintenance company
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Compensation for harm resulting from the usage of a building: Сomparative analysis of Russian and Chinese law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 455-476.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/32964/1/455-476.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 806,09 kB