title: DERRIDA’S OTHER TRANSCENDENTAL AESTHETIC
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: LOBO, CARLOS
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-08-10T21:43:38Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-08-10T21:43:38Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: LOBO C. DERRIDA’S OTHER TRANSCENDENTAL AESTHETIC. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2023, vol. 12 issue 1, pp. 48–73.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2023-12-1-48-73
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/43738
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: By going back to the starting point of Derrida’s debates with some of the main representatives of structuralism
  in France, I propose to highlight the ambiguities that cover the very notion of structure, and
  to take the measure of the exact role that the reference to phenomenology plays then and will continue
  to play thereafter. Among these ambiguities: the one that touches the mathematical notion of structure,
  central in the triumphant structuralist mathematical current in France at that time; and especially: the
  one called “groups of transformations,” the most important one to understand at the same time the
  audacities and the impasses of structuralism. The hard core of mathematization of modern physics,
  with Galileo’s principle of relativity, then developed in a masterly way in Einstein’s theory of relativity
  rest on this very structure. After tracing the broad outlines of these initial discussions, we engage
  in an analysis of how it is possible to understand the “epistemological contemporaneity” of relativity
  theory and Husserl’s transcendental aesthetics. Based on a thorough exploration of the analyses of the
  intersubjective constitution of space, time and the objective common world, we identify this central
  structure that Husserl calls “intersubjective group of transformation.” Equipped with this phenomenological
  structure, we trace this motif in Derrida’s work. Its insistence allows us to understand how
  the phenomenological premises of his critique of structuralism can help to understand his theoretical
  positions, especially in contrast to Jean-Luc Nancy.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 12; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: structure
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: group of transformation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: relativity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: coordinate system
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: intersubjectivity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: space and time
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: body
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: DERRIDA’S OTHER TRANSCENDENTAL AESTHETIC
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 03_Lobo.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/43738/1/03_Lobo.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 676,08 kB