title: The internet-meme and the ethics: A review of scientific research for 2018–2022
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Glikina, Anna V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-02-02T17:28:21Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-02-02T17:28:21Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Glikina A. V. (2023). The internet-meme and the ethics: A review of scientific research for 2018–2022. Media Linguistics, 10 (4), 538–553. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2023.406 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2023.406
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44804
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article accumulates, systematizes and qualifies the most significant modern and relevant
  scientific works in the field of digital ethics and memetics over the past five years by means
  of a semisystematic analysis. This method allows us to consider various areas of research for
  a specified period and provide an overview of scientific sources on issues of digital ethics and
  memetics. The studies reviewed by the author were selected on scientific and technical bases
  as eLibrary, CyberLeninka and CORE according to the following keywords: Internet meme,
  memetics, digital ethics, ethics of a journalist, social networks. The author’s focus is on identifying
  gaps in research on both internet memes and digital ethics. The author aims to identify
  different aspects of the relationship between the Internet meme and the ethics of its creation
  and distribution, as well as to outline the prospects for further research of the problems raised.
  The presented article specifies the range of existing semantic gaps in scientific concepts and
  identifies the main lines of development of the problem. As a result of the study the author
  notes that the study of creolized texts comes down to three problematic issues: how they influence
  the user’s picture of the world, how they become popular and who creates them. At the
  same time, the ethical side of the issue is not touched upon by the authors in their works. Most
  scholarly articles on digital ethics and journalism ethics boil down to three areas: analysis of
  codes of ethics, analysis of user behavior on social networks and analysis of the spread of fake
  information online. Thus, the author concludes that digital ethics scholars almost never consider
  Internet memes as a subject of study, and vice versa, researchers of Internet memes rarely
  address ethical issues in their works.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Media Linguistics;Volume 10; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: internet-meme
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: digital ethics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: journalistic ethics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: social media
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: memetics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The internet-meme and the ethics: A review of scientific research for 2018–2022
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 538-553.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/44804/1/538-553.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 674,87 kB