title: The Role of Bureaucratic Politics in Egypt’s Africa Policies under Mubarak. Part Two
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Salem, Marwa M.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-04-28T12:29:43Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-04-28T12:29:43Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Salem M. M. The Role of Bureaucratic Politics in Egypt’s Africa Policies under Mubarak. Part Two. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, 2020, vol. 12, issue 1, pp. 123–140.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2020.109
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17409
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The decision-making process in Egypt during the rule of President Hosni Mubarak was dominated
  by the president and a very small core group comprised mainly of advisers whom he
  appointed and dismissed. Towards the end of his rule, Mubarak was no longer capable of
  resuming his duties effectively. Therefore, several issues were left to be handled by the relevant
  ministry. It became possible for some parts of the bureaucracy to make a significant impact on
  foreign policy, particularly on topics not of interest to the ruling elite. The Nile Waters issue is
  one of the most important manifestations of the dynamics of Egypt’s foreign policy decisionmaking
  process under Mubarak at this stage. The analysis explores the role of institutions in
  water policy making, aiming to draw attention to the dominant role of the Ministry of Water
  Resources during the Cooperative Framework Agreement talks compared to other institutions,
  such as the foreign ministry. Also it examines the phenomenon of ‘bureaucratic rivalry’
  that prevailed at that time, while demonstrating that the Egyptian delegation faced great difficulties
  during the talks. Thus, the argument remains that the bureaucratic institution, despite
  its subordinate role, is partly responsible for Egypt’s foreign policy unhappy ending under
  Mubarak.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies;Volume 12; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: decision-making process
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: bureaucratic politics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: African politics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Egypt’s Africa policies
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Egyptian foreign ministry
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: President Mubarak
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Nile Waters issue
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The Role of Bureaucratic Politics in Egypt’s Africa Policies under Mubarak. Part Two
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 123-140.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17409/1/123-140.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 687,65 kB