title: Transformation of political and administrative coordination strategies in the structure of public risk management
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Aleinikov, Andrei V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Maltseva, Daria A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Safonova, Olga D.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-06-27T19:53:24Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-06-27T19:53:24Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2024-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Aleinikov A. V., Maltseva D. A., Safonova O. D. Transformation of political and administrative coordination strategies in the structure of public risk management. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 2024, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 23–32. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2024.102
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2024.102
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/45640
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article problematizes a range of issues related to the transformation of coordination relations
  in the structure of public administration when making decisions under conditions of uncertainty.
  The main substantive objective of the study is to analyze the conceptual model of
  strategies and political-administrative coordination mechanisms of interaction in risk situations,
  the features of management influences that ensure enhanced functionality of prevention and
  distribution of threats, especially in the context of digitalization. The research methodology is
  based on classical and modern concepts of public management, risk and its perception, and
  theories of political coordination of various forms of algorithmic threat management. The article
  argues that coordination in the structure of public administration is a political form of coordination
  and correction of political interests, rules of interaction between producers and consumers
  of risks, their beneficiaries and those most exposed to risks. The article proves that political and
  administrative coordination in the field of risk management is aimed at minimizing the results of
  conflicts of interest, deformation of the perception of threats and dangers into riskophobia or
  riskophilia. The authors argue that government monopolization of the right to information about
  risks reduces the possibilities for joint coordination and the effectiveness of political strategies
  to address threats. The analysis made it possible to come to the conclusion that the discoordination
  of functions, tasks and risk management processes does not allow the preferences and
  perceptions of risk of social actors to be aggregated into the overall interest of preventing and forecasting threats, and forms points of blockade of the structural-organizational and institutional-
  regulatory mechanism for controlling hazards in the social system. The study identifies
  and describes dysfunctions in the field of public administration associated with discoordination
  of political risk management, highlights institutional, distributional, behavioral and paternalistic
  management failures in situations of uncertainty, threats and dangers, identifies and describes
  mechanisms of political-administrative coordination risk management.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The study was carried out with financial support of the Russian Science Foundation, Project
  no. 19-18-00115. https://rscf.ru/project/19-18-00115 in the part of the article written by A. V. Aleinikov
  and with financial support of EISR, Project no. 123091200053-0 “Dynamics of transformation of digital
  public administration in modern Russia: political strategies and risks in the context of escalating global
  conflict”, which is being implemented at INION RAN in the part of the article written by D. A. Maltseva
  and O. D. Safonova.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Political Expertise: POLITEX;Volume 20; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: transformation of public governance
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: political and administrative coordination
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: risk
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: risk reflection
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: political risk management
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: managerial failures
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Transformation of political and administrative coordination strategies in the structure of public risk management
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 02_Алейников,+Мальцева,+Сафонова.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/45640/1/02_%d0%90%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%b9%d0%bd%d0%b8%d0%ba%d0%be%d0%b2%2c%2b%d0%9c%d0%b0%d0%bb%d1%8c%d1%86%d0%b5%d0%b2%d0%b0%2c%2b%d0%a1%d0%b0%d1%84%d0%be%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%b2%d0%b0.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 623,81 kB