title: INGARDEN’S HUSSERL: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE 1915 REVIEW OF THE LOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: BYRNE, THOMAS
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-12-09T15:06:44Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-12-09T15:06:44Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: BYRNE T. INGARDEN’S HUSSERL: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE 1915 REVIEW OF THE LOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2020, vol. 9, issue 2, pp. 513–531.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-2-513-531
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/21401
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This essay critically assesses Roman Ingarden’s 1915 review of the second edition of Edmund Husserl’s Logical Investigations. I elucidate and critique Ingarden’s analysis of the differences between the
  1901 first edition and the 1913 second edition. I specifically examine three tenets of Ingarden’s interpretation. First, I demonstrate that Ingarden correctly denounces Husserl’s claim that he only engages
  in an eidetic study of consciousness in 1913, as Husserl was already performing eidetic analyses in
  1901. Second, I show that Ingarden is misguided, when he asserts that Husserl had fully transformed
  his philosophy into a transcendental idealism in the second edition. While Husserl does appear to
  adopt a transcendental phenomenology by asserting–in his programmatic claims–that the intentional
  content and object are now included in his domain of research, he does not alter his actual descriptions of the intentional relationship in any pertinent manner. Third, I show Ingarden correctly predicts
  many of the insights Husserl would arrive at about logic in his late philosophy. This analysis augments
  current readings of the evolution of Ingarden’s philosophy, by more closely examining the development
  of his largely neglected early thought. I execute this critical assessment by drawing both from Husserl’s later writings and from recent literature on the Investigations. By doing so, I hope to additionally
  demonstrate how research on the Investigations has matured in the one hundred years since the release
  of that text, while also presenting my own views concerning these difficult interpretative issues.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 9; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Ingarden
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Husserl
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: phenomenology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Logical Investigations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: transcendental reduction
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: logical grammar
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: essence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: descriptive psychology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: INGARDEN’S HUSSERL: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE 1915 REVIEW OF THE LOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 513-531.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/21401/1/513-531.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 648,79 kB