title: Phonetics and orthoepy: Status, object and tasks of two disciplines
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kalenchuk, Maria L.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-03-03T16:42:15Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-03-03T16:42:15Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Kalenchuk M. L. Phonetics and orthoepy: Status, object and tasks of two disciplines. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2020, 17 (4): 571–581.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2020.405
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/25100
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: It is known that two linguistic disciplines — phonetics and orthoepy — coexist on the sound
  level of the Russian language. The question of the relationship between the status, object and
  tasks of these sections as independent linguistic disciplines is debatable. In the works of modern
  scientists, two main approaches to the definition of phonetics and orthoepy can be found.
  Some linguists traditionally believe that both sections of the science of spoken speech study
  the same language material, but from different angles. Others attempt to differentiate the areas
  of responsibility of phonetics and orthoepy, showing that they operate in principle with different
  sound facts. The article formulates and analyzes these points of view and offers a new
  approach that allows not to contrast phonetics and orthoepy, but to combine them on the basis
  of the principle of positional structure. The implementation of a phoneme under the action
  of an orthoepic regularity is probabilistically predicted by a number of factors of different
  nature — phonetic, lexical, grammatical, word-forming, graphic and sociolinguistic, which
  were previously proposed to be called orthoepic positions. These factors do not operate in isolation,
  but there is a complex hierarchical system of relationships between them. It is possible
  to provide a description of the sound system of the Russian language, in which pronouncing
  patterns are divided not into phonetic and orthoepic, but into positional and non-positional.
  The concepts of phonetic and orthoepic positions can either be combined into a single concept
  of pronouncing positions, or, while preserving the concepts of phonetic and orthoepic positions,
  the former can be considered as a particular manifestation of the latter, which removes
  the question of differences between phonetics and orthoepy.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 17; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sound speech
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: phonetics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: orthoepy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: norms of pronunciation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Phonetics and orthoepy: Status, object and tasks of two disciplines
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 571-581.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/25100/1/571-581.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 665,03 kB