title: Dipartite principle in the mechanism of the real right’s alteration in China
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Chen, Shuxiu
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-10-16T11:21:10Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-10-16T11:21:10Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Chen, Sh. 2023. Dipartite principle in the mechanism of the real right’s alteration in China. Pravovedenie 67 (3): 343–374. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.306
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.306
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44254
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The discrepancy of real right transfer mode decides the registered effects of real estate register
  (Confrontation or Confirmation Doctrine) and its examinational scope, further influencing the
  credibility and applied scope of the real estate register. The defined basis of the transfer mode
  is the attitude toward the juristic act of liability and juristic act of disposition, the causality and
  nonature of the juristic act of disposition. According to the research on the history, axiology
  and systematology, the transfer mode with the idealism has been cancelled in Chinese legislation,
  but there are still some exceptions. The enacting of the article 595 of the Civil Code is to
  distinguish the relationship between sales contracts and other contracts, which is unable to
  combine it with the article 598 and then deem the double effects of the sales contracts. The
  distinguish between juristic act of liability and juristic act of disposition in Chinese civil law has
  been confirmed by the juridical practices, which contained in the article 215 of the Civil Code.
  This distinguish is a summary of social and life experiences, particularly outstanding in the presale
  of house, the real estate register and the non-real time sales. In the real estate register, the
  consensus of both parties includes in the registration application, their signature means the
  agreement for the change of real right. The article 597 of the Civil Code stipulates the juristic act
  of liability’s effect when the seller has no right to dispose it. The distinguish principle in the theory
  of juristic act of real right, is not only beneficial to protect the third party, but can also clear
  the legal relation in the complicated disputes. In this condition, some scholars still deny that the
  separation of juristic act of liability and juristic act of disposition is induced by the preconceived
  notions. Although the principle of abstraction has some advantages to protect the transaction
  safety and simplify the trading programs, no identified basis can be found in the examinational
  scope and related law when the authority handles the registration.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 67; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Chinese law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Dipartite principle
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Creditor’s rights formalism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Real right formalism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Juristic act of liability
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Juristic act of disposition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Causality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Real right transfer
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Dipartite principle in the mechanism of the real right’s alteration in China
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 06.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/44254/1/06.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 1,02 MB