title: On the place and significance of judicial practice and legal precedent in Russian civil procedural law
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Samsonov, Nikolai V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-07-04T19:59:52Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-07-04T19:59:52Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Samsonov, Nikolai V. 2019. “On the place and significance of judicial practice and legal precedent in Russian civil procedural law”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 2: 293–310.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.207
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15861
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article examines the possibility of attributing judicial practice and judicial precedent to the sources (forms) of civil procedural law. The author claims that these categories are close, but not identical; analyzes various approaches to their understanding in the legal literature, and also formulates their definitions. The author distinguishes judicial practice in a broad and narrow sense, outlining the hierarchical boundaries of the latter from decisions made by the court of first instance to decisions of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, made in specific cases as supervisors; the author draws attention to the special nature of the Decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and reviews of judicial practice approved by the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, due to the fact that they are not acts issued in specific cases, and are taken out of procedural form. The author substantiates the thesis that the rulings of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, issued in exercising supervision, constitute a judicial precedent, currently implicitly recognized as the source (form) of the right at the legislative level, while the rest of the judicial practice within the specified limits individual elements, or in general, the source of law is not, and provides relevant examples. The author proposes the need to transfer implicit recognition of decisions of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, made in specific cases in the order of supervision to the category of explicit ones; and also notes the need to legislate additional conditions for the use of judicial precedent as a source (form) of law.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 10; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: civil proceedings
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: judicial practice
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: judicial precedent
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sources of civil procedural law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: On the place and significance of judicial practice and legal precedent in Russian civil procedural law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 293-310.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15861/1/293-310.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 660,22 kB