title: Stroop interference phenomenon in the context of lexical access theories
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Sopov, Mikhail S.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2018-05-23T09:16:36Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2018-05-23T09:16:36Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Sopov M. S. Stroop interference phenomenon in the context of lexical access theories. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology and Education, 2018, vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 47–69.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.104
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/10239
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The paper discusses a psycholinguistic approach to the empirical data obtained from the
  Stroop test and its modifications. In the classical Stroop test participants are required to name
  as quickly as possible the color in which a word is written, while ignoring the word meaning
  itself. Under certain conditions, the ignored information interferes with the naming of the
  color, resulting in slowed, error-prone responding. In psycholinguistics Stroop interference
  is considered as an inevitable consequence of speech production. Its explanation is given in
  several theories of lexical access, which are reviewed in the paper. Two groups of theories
  of lexical access are analyzed in the article: the theories of relative activation (the model of
  W. La Heij and colleagues, the model of A. Roelofs, and the conception of R. Abdel Rahman and A. Melinger) and the theories of absolute activation (Response Exclusion Account and
  the model of K. Mulatti and colleagues). It is postulated in the theories of the first group that
  Stroop interference occurs during the stage of response selection. According to the theories
  of the second group, Stroop interference occurs at the late stages of stimuli processing due to
  inappropriate response blocking. In conclusion, the author states that theories of lexical access
  fail to explain revealed interference phenomena. The ways of further development of the
  psycholinguistic theories to Stroop interference are discussed.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: Работа выполнена при поддержке гранта РФФИ № 15-06-05112.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Psychology and Education;Volume 8; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Stroop interference
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Stroop test
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: lexical access
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: speech production
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: lexical competition
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: psycholinguistics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Stroop interference phenomenon in the context of lexical access theories
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 04-Sopov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/10239/1/04-Sopov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 712,27 kB