title: THE TRANSCENDENTAL AND THE MUNDANE SPHERES: ARE THEY REALLY ONTOLOGICALLY DISCTINCT?
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: LIVADAS, STATHIS
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-02-02T14:49:19Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-02-02T14:49:19Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: LIVADAS S. THE TRANSCENDENTAL AND THE MUNDANE SPHERES: ARE THEY REALLY ONTOLOGICALLY DISCTINCT?. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2023, vol. 12 issue 2, pp. 479–501.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2023-12-2-479-501
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44790
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: As implied by the title this article deals with a key question running through the history of philosophy
  virtually since antiquity. This is the question of the relationship, on ontological grounds, of the
  transcendental and the mundane “universes” to the extent that the nature of transcendence, even as
  detached from the metaphysical sphere and recalibrated in terms of immanence in the broadly conceived
  subjectivist tradition, it is still a highly controversial issue primarily in continental philosophy.
  This is especially true in view of the obvious incompatibility, at least in a naive sense, of the transcendental
  and the mundane contexts for which the philosophical discussion on phenomenological
  grounds is still open. My own arguments on the issue are mainly based on the Husserlian and Heideggerian
  narratives and also on E. Fink’s approach to the transcendence versus mundanity ontological
  problematic. On these prompts I set out to defend the position that there are serious reasons to regard
  the realm of transcendence as ineluctably constrained by mundanity concerns. More concretely I will
  try to show that there is no way, at least in the context of the phenomenological discourse, to do away
  with a kind of mundanity influence even in the most pure transcendental level involving the cornerstone
  of Husserlian transcendental phenomenology which is the concept of absolute ego. My overall
  approach, more than an attempt at vindicating Fink’s objections as to the purely transcendental level
  reached after the radical phenomenological reduction, is a demonstration of the conceptual pitfalls
  or even circularities involved along the way in trying to establish a sound foundation for a purely
  transcendental ontological level.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 12; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: absolute ego
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Dasein
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: mundanity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: operative concept
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: nature
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: transcendental reduction
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: THE TRANSCENDENTAL AND THE MUNDANE SPHERES: ARE THEY REALLY ONTOLOGICALLY DISCTINCT?
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 12_Livadas.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/44790/1/12_Livadas.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 653,4 kB