title: On the History of Military Law in the Period of Duma Monarchy
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Florinsky, Mikhail F.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-05-05T21:19:42Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-05-05T21:19:42Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Florinsky M. F. On the History of Military Law in the Period of Duma Monarchy. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2020, vol. 65, iss. 1, pp. 140–157.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2020.108
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17507
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article deals with the issues related to the functioning of the higher state institutions of the
  Russian Empire on the eve of the First World War. The Fundamental Laws of 1906 resulted in
  the approval of a representative system of government in the country. Although the monarch’s
  legislative prerogatives in the form of a general rule were now limited by two-chamber parliament
  represented by the State Duma and the reformed State Council, the emperor still had
  the opportunity, under certain conditions, to override parliamentarians in a number of areas
  of state life. These areas included the administration of the imperial military forces. The issue
  of the prerogatives of the crown and the legislative chambers repeatedly became the subject of
  political and legal conflicts, and Article 96 of the Fundamental Laws, which defined the scope
  of the powers granted to the monarch in the military sphere, was formulated in such a way that
  allowed for a wide variety of interpretations. The approval by Nicholas II on 24 August 1909 of
  Special Rules that explained the meaning of the article to the disadvantage of the prerogatives
  of the Duma and the State Council did not change anything in this sphere. Conflicts between
  the Government and parliamentarians and discussions within the government itself continued,
  which in many respects reflected the desire of the Military and Navy ministries to prevent
  interference in their affairs by both civilian agencies and Chambers,. This article reconstructs
  the history of the drafting of the instruction, which was intended to explain the meaning of
  the Rules on 24 August.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Volume 65; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: legislation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: parliamentarians
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Government
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Ministry of War
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Ministry of the Sea
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: basic laws
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: department
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: On the History of Military Law in the Period of Duma Monarchy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 140-157.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17507/1/140-157.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 687,45 kB