title: Psycholinguistic model of salience translation applied to paremia (on the example of Buryat-English correlations)
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Budaeva, Tsyndyma Lvovna
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-12-09T12:25:14Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-12-09T12:25:14Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Budaeva T. L. Psycholinguistic model of salience translation applied to paremia (on the example of Buryat-English correlations). Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2019, 16 (2): 160–171.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2019.201
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16763
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article depicts the translation process in intercultural communication within a psycholinguistic
  approach, namely the model of salience translation developed by P. P. Dashinimaeva
  (2010, 2017a). According to this model, mental and speech stages occur as separate and asymmetric
  activation processes. This extends the stage of the original salience decoding, which includes
  three receptive versions of salience: natural salience-I, artificial version of salience-1 (of
  the addresser), and a version of salience-2 (of the addressee). The author applies the model to
  the translation of paremic units, which are classified as difficult-to-translate. Buryat-English
  correlations are used for the analysis. At the first stage of decoding, perception of the proverb
  evokes involuntary associations and images in the author’s mind that come out of his personal
  experience. At the next stage, the author “suppresses” these images and identifies the proverb’s
  didactic value, analyzing Buryat traditional values. At the last stage, he makes a pragmatic
  adaptation of the addresser’s version to the addressee’s, predicting the communicative effect.
  After analyzing the English behavior in different communicative situations, the author seeks
  English correlates with similar didactive value. The author then compares metaphorical images
  and ways of describing the situation in Buryat-English correlates and finally chooses the
  most appropriate English variant. In conclusion, the author provides several arguments that
  illustrate the reasonableness of using this model for the translation of paremic units.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 16; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: psycholinguistic model of salience translation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Buryat-English correlations
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: paremia
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: prescription
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Psycholinguistic model of salience translation applied to paremia (on the example of Buryat-English correlations)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 160-171.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16763/3/160-171.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 678,25 kB