title: Discursive-cognitive paradigm of the category of politeness in scientific communication (on the material of German-language reviews)
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Mkhitaryants, Evelina G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-01-18T21:25:07Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-01-18T21:25:07Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Mkhitaryants E. G. Discursive-cognitive paradigm of the category of politeness in scientific communication (on the material of German-language reviews). German Philology in St. Petersburg State University, 2023, vol. 13, pp. 42–62. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu33.2023.102 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu33.2023.102
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44601
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Problems of functioning of linguistic category of politeness in scientific
  discourse is relevant and not fully studied. The purpose of this article is a discourseoriented
  analysis of the implementation of that category. Within the framework
  of this study, textual typological, anthropocentric and intertextual features are
  taken into account. Secondary informativeness of the review is characterized
  by compression of the content space of the primary scientific text and by other
  features. The material of the study was reviews of articles and monographs in
  the field of German studies, sociolinguistics and methods of teaching German
  as a foreign language. The research methods are the contextual method, the
  method of linguistic interpretation of the text, the comparative method. Forms of
  politeness are the object of study from the point of view of various perspectives.
  As the analysis showed, the concept of conventional academic politeness reveals
  its polytextual nature, interacting with such categories as accentuation, evaluation,
  modality, intertextuality, dialogicity. Communication in the scientific-critical
  discourse has its own characteristics, which reveal themselves in the evaluativemodal
  markers of positive and negative politeness. Three microfields of negative
  assessment can be distinguished: reinforcing, neutral and mitigating. The last of the
  listed microfields can be considered as negative politeness. The modal and temporal
  markedness of the modes of reinforcing and mitigating a negative assessment is
  localized in the compositional and semantic structure of the review text. Positive
  and negative politeness accompanies the evaluative-argumentative segments of the
  communicative-pragmatic paradigm of scientific-critical intertext.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: German Philology in St Petersburg State University;Volume 13
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: category of politeness
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: scientific discourse
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: secondary scientific texts
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: intertextuality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: evaluation category
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Discursive-cognitive paradigm of the category of politeness in scientific communication (on the material of German-language reviews)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 42-62.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/44601/1/42-62.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 696,42 kB