title: The relations of the church and the state in the Russian public polemic in the 1870–1890s
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Vorozhikhina, Ksenia V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-03-05T15:23:12Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-03-05T15:23:12Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Vorozhikhina K. V. The relations of the church and the state in the Russian public polemic in the 1870–1890s. Issues of Theology, 2019, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 518–531.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: http://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2019.404
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17175
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article examines different points of view on the relations between the Church
  and the state, expressed by thinkers, publicists and public figures of the second
  half of the 19th century. Slavophiles (A. A. Kireev) believed that during the reign of
  Emperor Alexander III, the Slavophile idea must win and become state ideology.
  The existing system of control over the church provoked a polemic concerning the
  role of the church in the life of the state and society. Bureaucratic nationalists —
  K. P. Pobedonostsev and M. N. Katkov — adhered to the position of “cesaropapism,”
  believing that the Church should serve the state in order to increase its power. The
  “papocesarists” (K. N. Leontiev, T. I. Filippov, and V. S. Solovyov), believed that the
  goals of the Church cannot be limited by national interests and concern ultimately spiritual rather than political tasks (in Soloviev’s opinion, the church and political
  spheres merge into theocracy). Metropolitan Anthony (Khrapovitsky) is the voice
  of the Byzantine Orthodox tradition, according to which absolute and sacred monarchical
  power harmoniously co-exists with the Church, headed by a patriarch, as
  two natures in Christ.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Issues of Theology;Volume 1; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: symphony of authorities
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: state church
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: theocracy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: nationality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: slavophilism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russian idea
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The relations of the church and the state in the Russian public polemic in the 1870–1890s
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 518-531.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17175/1/518-531.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 676,12 kB