title: On the Reception of N. Hartmann in France. The Problem of the Real: Per se Being or Transobjectivity?
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Gachkov, Sergueï
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-07-05T10:20:28Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-07-05T10:20:28Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Gachkov S. On the Reception of N. Hartmann in France. The Problem of the Real: Per se Being or Transobjectivity? Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2019, vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 52–66.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2019-8-1-52-66
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15885
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article aims to show some particularities of the reception of Nicolai Hartmann’s philosophy in postwar France. In my viewpoint, one of the recurrent problems in Hartmann’s philosophy is the status of ‘real being’ on all its levels (Gegebenheit, trans-objectivity, historical, natural being, etc.). According to Hartmann, ontology does not deal with a particular being, but rather with the transcendence of the real toward trans-objectivity. With that in mind, Hartmann seems to give solutions to many philosophical problems and difficulties engendered by the interaction of realism and spiritualism, phenomenology and criticism, by showing the multiplicity of forms of the real under the conditions of subject-object relation. It is shown in the article that Hartmann’s new ontology of the real does not completely go outside of the framework of the classical metaphysical and anthropological conception of the world. As such, our approach is not purely historical, but also hypothetical and theoretical. The article presents the following conclusions as regards Hartmann’s ontology: 1) the question about the real was considered as one of the most important questions in Hartmann’s ontology by its French interpreters, 2) these interpreters connected the question of the real with that of the irrational (Vuillemin), the multi-level structure of Being (Breton) or the intentional flow of phenomena (Gurvich), 3) the question about inter-objectivity was not discussed by Hartmann, nor by his French interpreters.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: fr
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 8; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Real
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: per se being
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: transobjectivity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: irrational
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: metaphysics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: given
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: knowledge
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Cogito
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: On the Reception of N. Hartmann in France. The Problem of the Real: Per se Being or Transobjectivity?
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 52-66.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15885/1/52-66.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 620,97 kB