title: Аrguments contra Divine atemporality in today’s analytic theology and some new counterarguments against them
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Shokhin, Vladimir K.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-05-08T14:31:17Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-05-08T14:31:17Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2024-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Shokhin V. K. Аrguments contra Divine atemporality in today’s analytic theology and some new counterarguments against them. Issues of Theology, 2024, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 31–44. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2024.102 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2024.102
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/45400
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Albeit it is only a half of century that the issue of Divine (a)temporality entered the
  agenda of big discussions within analytic philosophical theology, it has become one
  of the keenest controversial topics, and voices against God’s timelessness are getting
  louder. The author avows that although Divine nature as it is is inaccessible for a
  created mind, some other matters, i. e. which conceptions of it do correspond to the
  real theism and which don’t, as well as which of them fit better to the definition of
  God as the most perfect Being (quo melius nihil cogitari potest) and which fit worse
  are quite under its power. He offers responses to the majority of the arguments
  against Divine timelessness by using centuries-long dialectical methods but some of
  them are postponed for forthcoming special scrutiny. Obsecuiousness to evolutionism
  as the pretended one and only scientific worldview and some other attributes of
  the profound inner secularization of theology are highlighted as the main reasons
  of the temporalists’ appeal. Meanwhile, it is mentioned as well that polemics with
  them can be useful for theism inasmuch as it stimulates deeper meditation on those
  Divine attributes that seem as it were too self-evident.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Issues of Theology;Volume 6; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: God
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: temporality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: timelessness
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: changes
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: immutability
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: theism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: panentheism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: process theology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: weak theology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: controversial dialectics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Аrguments contra Divine atemporality in today’s analytic theology and some new counterarguments against them
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 31-44.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/45400/1/31-44.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 660,5 kB