title: The crisis of the “Liberal International Order” and the challenges from China and Russia
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: de Robertis, Antonio Giulio M.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Tkachenko, Stanislav L.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-02-18T11:25:54Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-02-18T11:25:54Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: De Robertis A. G., Tkachenko S. L. The crisis of the “Liberal International Order” and the challenges from China and Russia. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 2020, vol. 13, issue 4, pp. 465–477.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2020.403
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/24310
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The concept of “Liberal International Order” (LIO) is one of the most popular in contemporary
  international relations. LIO received global recognition and became a key factor of international
  politics after the Second World War. Studies of the LIO have gone through periods
  of peaks and valleys since the Second World War. Nowadays, the studies are once again at the
  epicenter of political discussions. Academic studies of the LIO face difficult challenges since
  the concept has found itself in a ‘grey zone’ between two well-established disciplines — political
  science and economics. Two factors, which signaled a deep crisis of the LIO are: 1) disaffection
  of people living in Western democracies in multiple negative effects of globalization;
  2) the progressive rising of powers such as China and Russia, whose political regimes are
  currently defined as illiberal. For many states in different parts of the world, the LIO did not
  generate prosperity for a majority of their population. Rather it led to an economically painful
  transformation from previous socio-economic systems as well as rising inequality. Member
  states of BRICS and of SCO have been and still are more respectful of the principles of the
  traditional Liberal International Order than the USA and western European countries. China
  currently is promoting a non-Western version of globalization, but it is still globalization with
  low customs barriers and the free movement of people, services and capital.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. International Relations;Volume 13; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Liberal International Order
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: BRICS
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: International Political Economy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Neo-Marxism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: embedded liberalism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The crisis of the “Liberal International Order” and the challenges from China and Russia
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 465-477.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/24310/1/465-477.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 632,18 kB