title: THE INGARDENIAN DISTINCTION BETWEEN INSEPARABILITY AND DEPENDENCE: HISTORICAL AND SYSTEMATIC CONSIDERATIONS
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: PIWOWARCZYK, MAREK
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-12-09T15:11:03Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-12-09T15:11:03Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: PIWOWARCZYK M. THE INGARDENIAN DISTINCTION BETWEEN INSEPARABILITY AND DEPENDENCE: HISTORICAL AND SYSTEMATIC CONSIDERATIONS. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2020, vol. 9, issue 2, pp. 532–551.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-2-532-551
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/21402
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In this paper I present the Ingardenian distinction between inseparability and dependence. My considerations are both historical and systematic. The historical part of the paper accomplishes two goals.
  First, I show that in the Brentanian tradition the problem of existential (or broadly: ontological) conditioning was entangled into parts—whole theories. The best examples of such an approach are Kazimierz Twardowski’s theory of the object and Edmund Husserl’s theory of parts and wholes. Second,
  I exhibit the context within which Ingarden distinguished inseparability and dependence. Moreover,
  Ingarden’s motivations are presented: the problem of understanding the Husserlian concept of “immanent transcendence,” the issue of the existence of purely intentional objects, and finally the problem of
  the relationship between individual objects and ideas. The systematic part deals with the ambiguity of
  Ingarden’s definition of inseparability. I seek to improve this definition by reference to the distinction
  (made by Ingarden himself) between absolute and summative wholes. I also present some divisions
  of inseparability and dependence and investigate whether these types of existential conditioning are
  reflexive, symmetric, or transitive.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: This paper is a result of project no. 2017/27/B/HS1/02455 and was funded by the National Science
  Center, Poland
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology;Volume 9; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: inseparability
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: dependence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: absolute whole
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: summative whole
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Roman Ingarden
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Edmund Husserl
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Kazimierz Twardowski
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: THE INGARDENIAN DISTINCTION BETWEEN INSEPARABILITY AND DEPENDENCE: HISTORICAL AND SYSTEMATIC CONSIDERATIONS
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 532-551.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/21402/1/532-551.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 632,88 kB