title: From Ledoux to Le Corbusier… and Back. To the Historiography of Revolutionary Architecture
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Sablin, Ivan D.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-12-12T17:14:39Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-12-12T17:14:39Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Sablin, Ivan. “From Ledoux to Le Corbusier… and Back. To the Historiography of Revolutionary Architecture”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts 9, no. 4 (2019): 688–697.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2019.406
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16825
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article discusses one of the most important aspects of the study of the architecture from
  the Great French Revolution — its supposed connection with the main trends and representatives
  of modernism (modern architecture of the 20th century). The once unconditionally
  postulated influence, or at least the internal affinity of the radical currents of the late 18th
  and early 20th centuries, in fact, turns out to be a series of random coincidences where any
  rigidly established relationship is fraught with violence over historical reality. It may make
  sense to try to revise some of the approaches adopted, finding unexpected similarity where it
  was least of all expected to be found. For example, using modern language, in the framework
  of both postmodern and anti-modern, that is in the architecture of the notorious totalitarian
  regimes. Clearly, the legacy of visionary projects from the time of the French Revolution
  could be claimed by various trends and creative groups throughout the 20th century. Perhaps
  the correct conclusion should be that the architecture of a certain period belongs only to its
  own era and no other. This can be well illustrated by the various disputes over the past century
  around the heritage of architecture from the turn of the 18th and 19th centuries. Starting from
  the (arbitrarily chosen) name of one of the first studies of architecture at the second half of the
  18th century, the book by the Austrian art historian E. Kaufmann, the author shows how the
  attitude to the so-called revolutionary architecture as well as to the notion of its importance
  for the present and the future of the culture of the West changed throughout this century.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts;Volume 9; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Revolutionary architecture
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: modern art
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: C.-N. Ledoux
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: E. Kaufmann
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: France
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Le Corbusier
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: From Ledoux to Le Corbusier… and Back. To the Historiography of Revolutionary Architecture
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 688-697.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16825/1/688-697.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 635,85 kB