title: Arist. Poet. 1454a31–33 Again
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kostyleva, Tatiana V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-02-11T14:28:42Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-02-11T14:28:42Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Kostyleva T. V. Arist. Poet. 1454a31–33 Again. Philologia Classica 2020, 15 (2), 411–415.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2020.214
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/23882
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Among the examples on how not to portray a character in tragedy, Aristotle names the female
  protagonist of the Iphigenia in Aulis, claiming that she is drawn in violation of the principle
  of consistency: begging to spare her life she is much unlike her later self. Philologists stood
  for Euripides, charging Aristotle with a lack of intuitive understanding. Moreover, as has been
  pointed out, the unaffected character of Iphigenia’s behaviour could find a footing in the ample
  observations on human psychology Aristotle himself made elsewhere in the Ethics and Rhethoric.
  Certain modern scholars, however, tend to side with Aristotle. To argumentatively prove
  or disprove the feasibility of the change Iphigenia undergoes seems thus to be close to impossible,
  both psychologically and aesthetically. A thought not alien to the Poetics goes as simple
  as that: not all the shifts and turns, so human and so easily observed in life, should find their
  way into art. One supposes Aristotle all too well recognised the fact that no example would in
  this case prove to be free of blame, while holding that the general applicability and inherent
  veracity of his theory goes unimpaired by the fact that it could in principle be assailed.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Philologia Classica;Volume 15; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Aristoteles
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Poetics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Euripides
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Iphigenia in Aulis
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the concept of homalon
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Arist. Poet. 1454a31–33 Again
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 411-415.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/23882/1/411-415.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 668,37 kB