title: Experimental study of the construction o tom, čto as a clausal complement of verbs and nouns in non-standard Russian
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Knyazev, Mikhail Yu.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Zarembo, Valeria S.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-03-03T17:02:21Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-03-03T17:02:21Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Knyazev M. Yu., Zarembo V. S. Experimental study of the construction o tom, čto as a clausal complement of verbs and nouns in non-standard Russian. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2020, 17 (4): 650–671.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2020.410
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/25105
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The spread of the complementation construction o tom, čto in non-standard Russian in recent
  decades has been attested in previous work. It has been established that the construction has
  a wide distribution and can replace not only ordinary complement clauses introduced by the
  complementizer čto (so-called čto-clauses), cf. podtverždat’ o tom, čto + p ‘confirm that p’
  instead of podtverždat’, čto + p, but also so-called to, čto-clauses (čto-clauses preceded by a
  demonstrative), including those embedded in prepositional phrases introduced by a preposition
  other than o, cf. ostanovit’sja o tom, čto + p ‘settle on the fact that p’ instead of ostanovit’sja
  na tom, čto + p. The construction can also appear as a clausal complement of nouns, cf.
  podtverždenie o tom, čto + p ‘confirmation that p’ instead of podtverždenie togo, čto + p. The
  latter uses have been reported to lead to a milder violation, compared to the uses of the construction
  with verbs. The present study tested the latter hypothesis experimentally by using
  acceptability judgment data. The experiment tested the effect of the subcategorization of the
  matrix predicate (in standard Russian), i. e., whether it takes a direct object/čto-clause or a
  prepositional phrase (embedding a to, čto-clause). The findings suggest that there is a contrast
  in the status of clausal complements of verbs and nouns, specifically, that the latter are not
  genuine complements as has been earlier suggested in literature.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 17; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: prescriptive grammar
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: complement clauses
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: acceptability judgments
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: experimental study
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: nominalization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Experimental study of the construction o tom, čto as a clausal complement of verbs and nouns in non-standard Russian
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 650-671.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/25105/1/650-671.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 1 MB