title: Problems in Threatened Species Conservation: Differences in National Red Lists Assessments with Global Standards
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Evgeny, Abakumov
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Yulia, Kirillova
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Andrey, Brodsky
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-04-01T11:49:42Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-04-01T11:49:42Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-02-27
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Brodsky, A.; Abakumov, E.; Kirillova, I. Problems in Threatened Species Conservation: Differences in National Red Lists Assessments with Global Standards. Diversity 2023, 15, 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/ d15030337
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/39449
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The solution of transnational environmental problems in the field of the protection of
  threatened species and conservation biology directly depends on the level of international communication,
  which can significantly decrease due to differences in Red Lists and Red Data Books of
  different levels. In order to identify the similarities and differences in approaches to the assessment of
  national Red Lists and Books of the Baltic Sea region countries (Russia, Denmark, Germany, Lithuania,
  Finland, Poland and Sweden) with the IUCN Red List, a comparative analysis was carried out. It
  was determined that the level of discrepancy between Red Data Lists and Books varies considerably,
  with differences in the scales of species categories, species lists and categories. Most of the threatened
  species at the national level are not listed under the IUCN Red List, while species in a more stringent
  category at the national level prevail (37% and 3% on average, respectively). However, national Red
  Lists and Red Data Books do not take into account the global trend of the risk of extinction of species.
  The percentage of species with insufficient information to define a category at the national or global
  level ranges from 6% to 28%. These discrepancies make it difficult to exchange data on threatened
  species and create a unified database with information on protected species at different levels and,
  therefore, reduce the effectiveness of biodiversity conservation activities at regional and international
  levels. The results also demonstrate that countries have an international responsibility to conserve
  a species, and the cases identified can provide useful additional information to guide a national
  conservation strategy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: This research was funded by Saint Petersburg State University, project ID: 101662710
  (CZ_MDF-2023-1).
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: MDPI
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: red lists; red data books; threatened species; species categories; species protection; biodiversity conservation; Baltic region
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Problems in Threatened Species Conservation: Differences in National Red Lists Assessments with Global Standards
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: diversity-15-00337-v2 (1).pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/39449/1/diversity-15-00337-v2%20%281%29.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 939,55 kB