title: Risk-reflections design factors: Conflict lines of cleavages
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Aleinikov, Andrei V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Sunami, Artem N.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-11-10T12:05:23Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-11-10T12:05:23Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Aleinikov A. V., Sunami A. N. Risk-reflections design factors: Conflict lines of cleavages. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2022, vol. 38, issue 3, pp. 382– 396. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.310 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.310
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38505
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article examines the problem of risk reflections design based on the interpretation of risks
  and threats as a way of social order legitimization. Authors analyze the “cleavage” nature (in
  the terminology of Lipset — Rokkan approach) of the consequences of these designing. Using
  Paul Slovic “psychometric paradigm”, theory of “sociocultural viability” by Aaron Wildavsky
  and Karl Dake, Paul Schoemaker expected utility model, prospect theory by Amos Tversky
  and Daniel Kahneman, Vincent Covello “mental noise” approach and Mary Douglas works
  on main risk cultural types, the authors suggest that, despite their heuristic capacity all these approaches, modeling of probable risk reflections is impossible without examination of the
  current political agenda, formal and informal practices of interpreting dangers and threats
  in public political discourse, as well as political goal-setting and elites intentions. These elements
  can weaken/strengthen, shift/replace risk reflections, which is critical for identifying
  key social polarizations (“cleavages”) between “risk beneficiaries” and “risk outsiders”. In this
  context, the article focuses to “administrative” failures in political risk management, the victim
  of which is often the whole society, but not just those who were originally nominated as
  consumers of risk. On the basis of the identified structural, actor-oriented and institutional
  factors of risk decision-making and the strategies for programming risk reflections by dominant
  risk producers, the authors conclude that errors in the design of risk reflections generate
  risk-anomie in the most vulnerable groups of the population.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The reserarch was funded by the Russian Science Foundation grant no. 19-18-00115 “Risk-reflections
  in modern Russian conflict management strategies”.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 38; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: risk
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: risk reflection
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: risk theories
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: conflict
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: cleavage
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: political risk-management
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: risk-anomie
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: risk-solidarity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Risk-reflections design factors: Conflict lines of cleavages
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 10.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/38505/1/10.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 663,98 kB