title: Current trends of the principle of transparency and the right of access to administrative documents
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Cocozza, Giovanni
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-12-13T19:26:43Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-12-13T19:26:43Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Cocozza, Giovanni. 2019. “Current trends of the principle of transparency and the right of access to administrative documents”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 4: 699–711.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.406
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16869
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article focuses on recent developments of the principle of transparency in Italian jurisdiction
  law, in relation to the needs that arise in European Law. In this regard, the provisions of
  the Italian reforms in recent years are examined. Even if with some difficulties, they are aimed
  at defining, developing, and providing substance to the principle of transparency. Transparency
  is increasingly essential in the activity of public administration for its fundamental role in
  the protection of individuals, and as an instrument to fight corruption, also enhancing forms
  of cooperation between citizens and public administration. Accordingly, the critical points of
  the legislation are considered, in particular the absence of agreement between the new right of
  access, so-called in Italian “diritto di accesso civico generalizzato” (introduced in 2016), and
  the pre-existing types of right of access to documents of the public administration. There are
  three types of right of access in the Italian legislation: the first provided in 1990, the second in
  2013 and the third in 2016. Each of these are unique in terms of their conditions and features.
  The situation has resulted in an overlap of norms and difficulties in the legal regulation of various
  types of jurisdiction. The paper analyzes the European provisions, also considering the debate
  on the possibility of a codification of a European administrative proceeding. In this way,
  one can see the symmetries and the needs in the different legal systems, in search of a balance
  between the methods of making administrative decisions and the protection of citizens’ rights.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law;Volume 10; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Principle of transparency
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Right of access to administrative documents
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Italian reforms
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: European administrative procedure
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Protection of individuals
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Current trends of the principle of transparency and the right of access to administrative documents
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 699-711.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16869/1/699-711.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 650,45 kB