title: The return of poetics. Julia Kristeva vs Mikhail Bakhtin
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Barsht, Konstantin A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-08-24T21:43:13Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-08-24T21:43:13Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Barsht K. A. The return of poetics. Julia Kristeva vs Mikhail Bakhtin. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2021, 18 (2): 242–261.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2021.201
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/32919
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article offers an analysis of the concept of “intertext” that has been put forward by Julia
  Kristeva in her work “The Destruction of Poetics” in comparison with Mikhail Bakhtin’s idea
  of a universal context and “infinite dialogue”. It is concluded that Kristeva incorrectly perceived
  Bakhtin’s thoughts about context and dialogue, which are personalistic in nature in
  contrast to Kristeva’s impersonal one based on the Freudian-driven “It” and social factors of
  the “intertext”. The article analyzes the theoretical basis of this concept, including the crisis in
  literary theory in the 1970s–1980s where there was frustration by the European and Russian
  scientific community in the universalism of binary oppositions. In this regard, the issue of
  overcoming the theoretical difficulties of literary aesthetics with the help of the ternary model
  of aesthetic communication (“metalinguistics”), which was developed by Bakhtin in his works
  since the 1930s and was not heeded by Kristeva, has not yet been mastered in modern philological
  science. This concept is based on the idea of aesthetics as metaethics, which is built up
  in the process of textual communication over simple binary ethical exchange. The article suggests
  that the use of this idea of a ternary (metalinguistic) construction of the communicative
  field of a literary work can significantly advance the solution of many problems in theoretical
  poetics, in particular, reveal new ways for linking the discursive-textual and axiological fields
  of a literary-fiction text into one whole.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 18; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Julia Kristeva
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Mikhail Bakhtin
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: intertext
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: dialogue
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ternary aesthetic communication
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The return of poetics. Julia Kristeva vs Mikhail Bakhtin
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 242-261.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/32919/1/242-261.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 689,95 kB