title: The comparative historical and comparative legal characteristics of the Islamic criminal procedure
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Gusenova, Patimat A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Stoyko, Nikolay G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-01-19T11:35:42Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-01-19T11:35:42Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Gusenova P. A., Stoyko N. G. The comparative historical and comparative legal characteristics of the Islamic criminal procedure. Issues of Theology, 2020, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 550–566.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2020.402
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/22409
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In order to analyze and characterize modern forms of the criminal process, it is customary
  to use comparative legal typologies. Within the framework of the comparative
  legal approach, the division of the criminal investigative process and controversial
  types is widespread (‘common’). Each of them is characterized by a certain spectrum
  of ideal attributes, opposed to each other and “embedded” in a wider typology of legal
  families. This article raises the question of the existence of a third universal model
  of the criminal process, which is considered the criminal process of the countries of
  Islamic rule (Islamic). It is concluded that in its technical structure (at the level of its
  procedural form), the Islamic criminal process belongs to the investigative type. However,
  if we consider the Islamic criminal process from the point of view of its procedural
  content, which has a religious legal explanation, it undoubtedly has the specifics
  that make it possible to speak of it as an independent ideal type (universal model). This is evidenced by three characteristics: the supremacy of the Koran and the Sunna
  over legislation and precedent; the priority of ijma (unanimous opinion of Muslim
  legal scholars) over the law (its procedural and substantive provisions) and judicial
  decisions (precedent); the administration of justice only by the cadi (judges who, by
  virtue of religious duty, subordinate to themselves all participants in the criminal process
  and are responsible for its entire course and outcome).
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Issues of Theology;Volume 2; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Islamic criminal process
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ijma
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Quran
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: typology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: qadi
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: justice
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The comparative historical and comparative legal characteristics of the Islamic criminal procedure
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 550-566.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/22409/1/550-566.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 664,86 kB