title: Latin Satire vs. Georgij Dashkow by Theophanes Prokopovich (Publication of the Text and Commentary)
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Budaragina, Olga V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-02-11T11:39:37Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-02-11T11:39:37Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Budaragina O. V. Latin Satire vs. Georgij Dashkow by Theophanes Prokopovich (Publication of the Text and Commentary). Philologia Classica 2020, 15 (2), 261–276.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2020.206
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/23864
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The paper submits the first publication of the hexametrical Latin satire of Theophanes Prokopovich
  (1681–1736), which consists of 172 verses and is his longest poetic work written in
  Latin during his St. Petersburg period. The manuscript is part of Prokopovich’s collection of
  works, which is kept in the Manuscripts Department of the St. Petersburg Branch of the Russian
  Academy of Sciences (Tec. Post. 142, f. 245–247 v.), and, as far as we know, it is the only
  surviving copy of the work. Although satire is untitled, it is very likely that the addressee of
  the attacks was Archbishop Georgyi (Dashkov) (d. 1739). In the satire, Dashkov is derived in
  an allegorical manner under the name of Grunnius and is depicted as a man who is viciously
  jealous of others and is unable to bear even the modest success of his fellow human beings. The
  article also touches upon two and a half lines from this satire that have been published to date,
  thanks to their quotation by Antioch Cantemir in the commentary on v. 41 of his third satire
  “On the Distinction of Human Passions. To the Archbishop of Novgorod”. In all Cantemir editions,
  the Latin text, and therefore the Russian translation of this couplet contain errors that
  have been corrected, and it is suggested that the new variant of the text and translation is to be
  taken into account in the preparation of future editions.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 20-012-42005.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Philologia Classica;Volume 15; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Theophanes Prokopovich
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Georgij Dashkov
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Antioch Cantemir
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Neo-Latin poetry
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: satire
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Latin Satire vs. Georgij Dashkow by Theophanes Prokopovich (Publication of the Text and Commentary)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 261-276.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/23864/1/261-276.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 730,15 kB