title: In the wake of one publication, or about the attitude to the history of science as a science
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kozhukhar, Vladimir G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-06-20T15:55:58Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-06-20T15:55:58Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Kozhukhar V.G. In the wake of one publication, or about the attitude to the history of  science as a science. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Medicine, 2022, vol. 17, issue 4, pp. 315–326.  https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu11.2022.407 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu11.2022.407
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/41633
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article is a historical investigation devoted to reliability of Professor T.A.Ginetsinskaya’s 
  publication about the circumstances of Professor E. S.Danini’s speech (December 1954) criti cizing O.B.Lepeshinskaya’s “new cellular theory”. After analyzing scientific sources, mem oirs of contemporaries of the described events and comparing the dates, the author proves 
  that E. S.Danini’s speech in the context given in T.A.Ginetsinskaya’s article could not have 
  taken place in reality. It took place in other circumstances and was not so dramatic. This is 
  indicated by the documented memories of eyewitnesses and participants of the meetings, as 
  well as materials of speeches by members of the Society of Anatomists, histologists and em bryologistsat the Institute of Experimental Medicine (including E. S.Danini). In addition, it 
  is shown that criticism of Lepeshinskaya’s “new cellular theory” had begun much earlier than 
  December 1954. The article provides data of numerous critical speeches about Lepeshinskaya’s 
  theory at various meetings in 1953 and 1954. Criticism of Lepeshinskaya’s views by the end of 
  1954 ceased to pose a danger to critics, and therefore the drama of the situation described in 
  Ginetsinskaya’s article does not seem to correspond to the realities of that time.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Medicine;Volume 17; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: T. A. Ginetsinskaya
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: E. S. Danini
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: O. B. Lepeshinskaya
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: new cell theory
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: history of science
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: In the wake of one publication, or about the attitude to the history of science as a science
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 07.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/41633/1/07.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 1,13 MB