title: ANALOGY, WEIGHING, AND DEDUCTION IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE FOLLOWING PRECEDENT
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Manzhosov, Sergei A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-03-04T12:04:46Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-03-04T12:04:46Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Manzhosov S. A. 2018 ANALOGY, WEIGHING, AND DEDUCTION IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE FOLLOWING PRECEDENT. Pravovedenie 62 (2): 400–421.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu25.2018.208
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17138
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Methodological features of justification of judicial decisions in the context of precedential
  law are often characterized through the use of the notion of “reasoning by analogy” (or
  “analogical argumentation”) usually represented as a particular method of the application of a law which is distinctive for precedents. In its turn, deductive logic is considered as
  a basic tool of application of statutes, and the procedure of weighing is taken to represent
  the specificity of application of constitution as a source of permanently conflicting legal
  norms of the utmost level of abstraction. The rigor of this “theory of a special method”
  makes many scholars seek a clarification of the structure of the following precedent,
  which would be without the use of notions of deduction and weighing. However, this
  approach has proven unavailing: it is generally accepted that the notion of “reasoning
  by analogy” still remains too vague and mysterious. This paper tries to give a primary
  analysis of the structure of the following precedent from the other side, under the premise
  of the methodological universality of the process of application of the law. The “open
  texture” theory advanced by H. L. A. Hart is the cornerstone for this analysis. The author
  comes to the conclusion that the analytical scheme of following precedent resulting
  from the reconstruction of this intellective procedure consists of a sequence of three different
  mental operations, one of which is appropriate to designate as “analogy”, though
  bearing polysemy of the term in mind. These basic operations — analogy, weighing, and
  deduction — are effected in the course of application of any legal norm, regardless of
  its source. On the basis of the inquiry’s findings, the author outlines the possible further
  development of the proposed approach.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научного
  проекта № 18-011-01136 «Доктрина прецедента в конституционном и международном
  правосудии».
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 62; Issue 2 (337)
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: precedent
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: stare decisis
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: analogy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: deduction
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: weighing
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: proportionality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: judicial method
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: legal reasoning
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: ANALOGY, WEIGHING, AND DEDUCTION IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE FOLLOWING PRECEDENT
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 400-421.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17138/1/400-421.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 655,52 kB