title: Chapter 3. Constructional syntactic analysis
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kuznetsov, Sergey A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Skrebtsova, Tatiana G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Suvorov, Sergey G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Klementyeva, Anna V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-12-02T10:28:56Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-12-02T10:28:56Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/9785288059278.04
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/21178
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: At this stage, a semantic-syntactic dictionary is activated, in order to supply the letter
  tokens with the information concerning their contextual realization and meaning proper.
  The list of features assigned to a word form is thus augmented by semantic and syntactic
  ones. Contextual realization is specified by means of subcategorization frames. Meaning
  is described in terms of semantic features which may or may not be hierarchically arranged. Among them, basic features are identified, e.g. ‘living being’, ‘action’, ‘space’, ‘time’,
  ‘quantity’, that have no direct bearing on the parts of speech. Thus, the feature ‘action’ can
  be assigned both to verbs and nouns. Additional semantic features make it possible to
  account for manifold aspects of word meaning. Thus, horse is marked both as ‘domestic
  animal’ and ‘vehicle’, which would be impossible in case of a strict hierarchy of features.
  The algorithm of syntactic analysis draws on the same basic idea as that of graphematical analysis, viz. iterative assembling of individual tokens into syntactic constructions,
  from local groups to larger ones until a resulting syntactic structure of a whole sentence
  emerges consisting of Subject-Predicate-Objects-Adverbials. Syntactic rules are ranked
  accordingly. The chapter illustrates the work of algorithm in a variety of cases and discusses multiple difficulties resulting from the syntactic ambiguity.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: semantic feature
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: subcategorization frame
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: syntactic analysis
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: syntactic rule
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: syntactic ambiguity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Chapter 3. Constructional syntactic analysis
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Book chapter
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 44-90.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/21178/1/44-90.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 808,78 kB