title: Christian paradoxology
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Goryachev, Daniil А. (priest)
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2023-09-29T16:55:12Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2023-09-29T16:55:12Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2023-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Goryachev D. А. Christian paradoxology. Issues of Theology, 2023, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 509–515. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2023.310 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2023.310
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/44008
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The subject of the review is a work on paradoxes in Theology. The focus of the
  reviewed book is on the Triadological and Christological dogmas. The first part of
  the book establishes the paradoxical nature of these dogmatic formulations due to
  the discovery of a logical contradiction in them. The reviewer draws attention to
  the patristic texts used here by the Protestant author. Attention is also drawn to the
  conclusion of a historical and theological nature, which shows that from the first to
  the twentieth century, no author offered an Orthodox explanation of the dogma of
  the St. Trinity, which would be free from contradictions. The same choice between
  logic and dogmatics, according to the monograph, accompanies Christology. In the
  second part of the book, the author offers his own model for resolving theological
  paradoxes, which he called the RAPT-model (rational affirmation of paradoxical
  theology), which causes the reviewer’s critical attitude. The review concludes that
  the author failed to maintain a position that simultaneously satisfies both dogmatic
  fidelity and logical consistency. At the same time, D. Anderson, developing his own
  analytical approach, according to the reviewer, evades orthodoxy.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Issues of Theology;Volume 5; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: dogma
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: theological paradox
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: paraconsistent logic
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: rationality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: analytical philosophy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: theological antinomy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Christian paradoxology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 509-515.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/44008/1/509-515.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 607,77 kB