title: On the legal status of the “art” of the artificial intelligence
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Naumov, Victor B.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Tytiuk, Ekaterina V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-03-04T13:22:15Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-03-04T13:22:15Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Naumov, Victor B., Tytiuk, Ekaterina V. 2018. On the legal status of the “art” of the artificial intelligence. Pravovedenie 62 (3): 531–540.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu25.2018.307
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17148
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article is dedicated to the issues of protection of artworks, created by the artificial intelligence
  or with the help of artificial intelligence. The authors of the article analyze the term “artificial
  intelligence” from the perspective of technologies, legal doctrine and legislation and provide
  critical comparison of these definitions, basing on which stipulate several key criteria of the
  definition of artificial intelligence. The article also describe basic principles of the working process
  of the artificial intelligence systems. Basing on the key criteria, provided as a result of the
  analysis of the existing definitions of the “artificial intelligence”, the authors generate their own
  definition of this term. The article also provides detailed analysis of the term “creativity” from the perspective of the objective and subjective approaches. The analysis includes comparison of
  the process of the creation of the work of art by the human and by the artificial intelligence. The
  authors question whether it is possible in principle to apply the term “work of art” to the objects
  created by the artificial intelligence. According to the authors’ point of view, current level of the
  artificial intelligence technologies does not provide any possibility to apply the term “creativity”
  to artificial intelligence as the model of the working process of the artificial intelligence is based
  ultimately on the mathematical algorithms. According to the article, this mean that the objects
  created by the artificial intelligence or with the help of it do not meet traditional requirements of
  creativity. The article provide several potential regulation models for the objects created by the
  artificial intelligence or with the help of it. These models can be broken down as follows: no legal
  protection is required, public domain model, protection under information law, protection as
  know-how objects, protection as intellectual property objects. The authors of the article provide
  comparative analysis of the above-mentioned models of protection, the advantages and disadvantages
  of each model, give their opinion on the existing and potential legislative initiatives in
  the sphere of artificial intelligence regulation.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The research was performed with financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  as a part of the scientific research No. 18-29-16015 “Сomprehensive research of the legal and ethical aspects,
  connected with development and appliance of the artificial intelligence and robotics systems”.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Pravovedenie;Volume 62; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: artificial intelligence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: copyright
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: exclusive rights
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: cyber physical system
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: creative work
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: know-how
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: draft law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: caselaw
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: information
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: On the legal status of the “art” of the artificial intelligence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 531-540.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17148/1/531-540.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 612,95 kB