title: A Beginning of Dialogue or an End of History?
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Dvornichenko, Andrey Yu.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-02-09T18:25:51Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-02-09T18:25:51Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Dvornichenko A. Yu. A Beginning of Dialogue or an End of History? Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2020, vol. 65, issue 4, рp. 1288–1301.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.issn
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2020.417
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/23691
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: At the beginning of his article the author postulates a general decline of culture nowadays
  which manifests itself in many kinds of arts, and also in the “art of History”. To the author’s
  dismay, the latter has been reduced to what can be called, according to Iu. I. Semenov, “istoriology”.
  Many historians now forget what history is, what an essence of scholar’s work is, what
  a scholar’s novelty is, and so on. To exemplify this tendency, the article concerns with the book
  recently published in Moscow. This monograph written by T. V. Chernikova consists of two
  books devoted to so called Europeanization of Russia. The first book focuses on the 15-16th
  centuries, and the second book — on the 17th century. This work is severely criticized in this
  review. The author shows that T. V. Chernikova does not explain the meaning of the word
  “Europeanization” and the essence of this notion. The author objects to the historiography
  and the sources in these books. However, the major criticism is concerned with the fact that
  historiography is not connected with the following text. The text itself based on a very limited
  range of scholarship and sources abounds in a large number of inaccuracies, errors and nonsense.
  Even this limited range of historiography the author of the books uses very originally.
  She simply retells some books or articles — sometimes she refers to them, sometimes — not!
  There is no academic novelty in the reviewed books, and their author does not understand
  what is “a historian’s craft” is. These books do not contribute to the scholarship at all.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Volume 65; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Culture
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: History
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: T. V. Chernikova
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Europeanization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russia of 15–17th centuries
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the End of Istoriology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: A Beginning of Dialogue or an End of History?
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 17.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/23691/1/17.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 665,12 kB