title: Benefits in law, legal science and practice
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Repev, Artem G.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-04-20T18:34:30Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-04-20T18:34:30Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Repev, Artem G. 2021. “Benefits in law, legal science and practice”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 1: 224–245.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.115
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/28073
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article presents a theoretical analysis of “privilege” as a category of jurisprudence through
  the prism of the system of advantages in law. The relevance of the research is due to the fact
  that despite the study (mainly in the field of financial and banking law) of benefits, this legal
  phenomenon has not become the object of a comprehensive analysis. For the first time, the
  author proves the significant impact of benefits on the functioning of many areas of modern
  society (state policy, economy, social relations, etc.). The practical significance of the study is
  due to the consideration of benefits as means aimed at strengthening the independence and
  special legal status of subjects in need of state support (business community, employees of
  state law enforcement and other bodies, etc.), as well as social assistance (disabled people, veterans,
  minors, etc.). The author aims to prove the social, state-legal necessity of using this legal
  tool in the process of regulating public relations, to consider the main functions and goals of
  benefits, their internal classification. Using a variety of means and methods of cognition, the
  objective and subjective determinants of legislative consolidation of such a deviation from
  equality are identified, based on social and natural causes of occurrence, economic conditions
  and special legal factors. The need to analyze legislation and law enforcement practice has
  determined the necessity to identify existing patterns and shortcomings of technical and legal
  consolidation of benefits. These include the presence of synonymy in the legislation, which
  is characteristic of the system of advantages, in which the same terms denote different legal
  phenomena in their essence; the absence of a definitive apparatus, which makes it necessary
  to develop technical and legal measures aimed at improving the legislative consolidation of
  benefits, removing administrative barriers to their implementation.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 12; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: benefit
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: privilege
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: immunity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: legal advantage
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: benefit
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: compensation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: evaluation concept
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Benefits in law, legal science and practice
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 224-245.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/28073/1/224-245.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 689,82 kB