title: THE HISTORY OF REFLEXIVE COPULAR VERBS WITH THE MEANING OF “TO BEGIN”
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Rudnev, Dmitriy V.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Руднев, Д.В.
metadata.lang: ru_RU
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2016-07-06T08:07:17Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2016-07-06T08:07:17Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2015
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Vestnik of St. Petersburg State University, Series 9. Philology. Asian Studies. Journalism;2, p.144-154
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.issn
metadata.value: 1813-1921
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/2330
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article examines the history of formation phase copular verbs that indicate the beginning of 
  attribute, based on the reflexive form of verbs with the meaning of creation in the Russian 
  lagnuage. It analyzes the history of copular verbs tvorit’sya–sotvorit’sya, chinit’sya–uchinit’sya 
  and partly of the verb delat’sya–sdelat’sya and some others. The article investigates the causes 
  and conditions of forming this group of phase copular verbs. In the Russian language the verb 
  stat’–stanovit’sya formed, apparently, still in the pre-Slavic era, but its use, especially of the 
  stat’ form, was avoided in literary language because of the semantic and stylistic reasons. Copula 
  stat’ formed in colloquial speech, and for a long time retained a shade of its colloquial nature; 
  its phase with the meaning of beginning was complicated with the undertone of emergence. It was 
  the main reason that made the written language to develop new copular verbs on the basis of 
  reflexive form of verbs with the meaning of creation. Under certain conditions, which are discussed 
  in the article, the grammatical subject of sentences with these verbs lost its indica- tion of 
  agent and began to express the object of perception, and the verb expressed an abstract meaning of 
  “to begin”. In the 19th century copula stat’ lost its colloquial shade and a shade of emergence. 
  This fact caused dying of phase copular formed on the basis of reflexive form of verbs meaning 
  creation.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: compound nominal predicate, copular verb, sentence, historical syntax, Russian language.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: THE HISTORY OF REFLEXIVE COPULAR VERBS WITH THE MEANING OF “TO BEGIN”
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title.alternative
metadata.value: ИСТОРИЯ ВОЗВРАТНЫХ СВЯЗОЧНЫХ ГЛАГОЛОВ СО ЗНАЧЕНИЕМ ВОЗНИКНОВЕНИЯ
metadata.lang: ru_RU
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: Rudnev_Istoriya vozvratnykh svyazochnykh glagolov so znacheniem vozniknoveniya.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/2330/1/Rudnev_Istoriya%20vozvratnykh%20svyazochnykh%20glagolov%20so%20znacheniem%20vozniknoveniya.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 176,53 kB