title: The comparative analysis of the law of evidence in civil proceedings in France and Russia
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Nakhova, Elena A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-08-12T13:32:38Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-08-12T13:32:38Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Nakhova, Elena A. 2022. “The comparative analysis of the law of evidence in civil proceedings in France and Russia”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 1: 257–270.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.115
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/37351
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article deals with the problems of the legal nature and legislative consolidation of norms of
  evidentiary law in France and Russia. The author claims that it is more optimal to consolidate
  norms of proof and evidence in evidentiary law of Russia. At the same time, Russian theory
  of evidence needs radical reform. The legal approach to the concept of proof in legislation of
  Russia and France is differentiated. In French evidentiary law, the ranking of evidence is legally
  fixed, which cannot be recognized as dignity. However, legal norms regarding some means of
  proof are sufficiently developed. The means of proof, which are outdated as legislation and
  judicial practice, are still fixed. At the same time, the legal regulation of electronic evidence has
  been sufficiently developed, which can be recognized as an advantage of French evidentiary
  law. Russian evidentiary law does not provide for legal regulation of electronic evidence as
  an independent means of proof. The following areas of improvement of Russian evidentiary
  law are highlighted: improvement of the theory of proof, optimization and unification of the
  legal regulation of the rules of evidence, reception of effective means of regulation from the
  evidentiary law of foreign countries, and detailed legal regulation of individual means of proof.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 13; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: French civil proceedings
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the Russian civil proceedings
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russian procedural legislation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: French procedural legislation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the concept of reforming civil procedural legislation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: evidentiary law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: proof and evidence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The comparative analysis of the law of evidence in civil proceedings in France and Russia
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 15.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/37351/1/15.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 664,83 kB