title: Philosophical conceptual apparatus formation in ukrainian literary works of the 17th century: ‘dobro’ and ‘blaho’
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Dovga, Larysa M.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2017-07-04T14:11:37Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2017-07-04T14:11:37Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2017-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Dovga L. M. Philosophical conceptual apparatus formation in ukrainian literary works of the 17th century: ‘dobro’ and ‘blaho’. Vestnik SPbSU. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2017, vol. 33, issue 1, pp. 98–106.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.110
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/6634
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The history of the formation of theological and philosophical apparatus in the Ukrainian literary
  works in early modern era period remains today almost untouched field of humanitarian studies.
  Meanwhile the ratio to the text and to the word, understanding its (word) significance, search of the
  semantic relations between different words/concepts/terms as well as the establishing semantic fields
  of individual lexemes are the signs that signal about the type of cultural area, thinking practices that
  prevalent in it, finally, about the formation of their own philosophical discourse within the particular
  culture. The article defines the semantic fields and the principles of use of lexemes “dobro” and “blaho”
  in the Ukrainian publications of the first quarter of the 17th century, in particular in the book “Likarstvo
  na ospalyi umysl cholovichyi” (Ostrog, 1607). On the basis of the conducted analysis the following
  conclusions are offered: 1) in texts written in Church Slavonic there is a trend towards diluting the
  semantic field of lexemes “blaho” and “dobro”, where the first is reserved for the defining of the area
  of the sacred, and the second describes all the positive things that occurs in life on earth; 2) the texts
  written in old Ukrainian language, completely missing the lexeme “blaho”, in return “dobro” applies to
  the sacred, and morally advanced plots in the profane world; at the level of everyday usage this lexeme
  is usually replaced by the synonyms of the other, not symbolic order; 3) the difference between the
  discourse that operates with the concepts and everyday language is less fixed on the choice of language
  (sacral, Church Slavonic or just “simple” old Ukrainian), but on the level at verbalized intellectual
  activity, fixed in the specific variations of word usage within every linguistic usage. Refs 20.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 33; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Ukrainian culture
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: lexeme
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: concept
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sacred
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Good
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: good
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Philosophical conceptual apparatus formation in ukrainian literary works of the 17th century: ‘dobro’ and ‘blaho’
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 10-Dovga.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/6634/1/10-Dovga.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 514,2 kB