title: Three types of negation in Russian (on the example of A. V. Druzhinin’s texts)
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Shuneyko, Alexander A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Chibisova, Olga V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-08-10T17:12:50Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-08-10T17:12:50Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Shuneyko A. A., Chibisova O. V. Three types of negation in Russian (on the example of A. V. Druzhinin’s texts). Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2022, 19 (1): 210–222.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2022.112
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/37328
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The study is aimed at identifying the formal, substantive, and functional characteristics of
  negation-ambivalence, thereby expanding the traditional concept of negation. To achieve this
  goal, methods of semantic and functional analysis were used: within their framework, a matrix
  was developed for comparing various types of negations. As a result of using this matrix
  on the material of A. V. Druzhinin’s texts, the following conclusions were drawn. Negationambivalence
  differs from standard negation and oxymoron in the way it reflects reality conveyed
  by semantics and the number of components involved in communication. It can be
  argued that there are four communicative reasons for using negation-ambivalence in texts:
  collisions of different points of view on one object; the multidimensionality of the object itself;
  the complexity of the description; and speech reasons associated with the level of linguistic
  competence of the speaker. Negation-ambivalence is always associated with situations of
  choice. It can also be assumed that it is a marker of boundary states. This research can lead to
  a local change in scholarly thinking and the practice of perceiving linguistic communicative
  forms. Using negation-ambivalence as a text analysis tool allows streamlining many cases, the
  status of which researchers argue to this day.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 19; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: A. V. Druzhinin
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: standard negation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: oxymoron
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: negation-ambivalence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Three types of negation in Russian (on the example of A. V. Druzhinin’s texts)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 13516-Текст статьи-43920-1-10-20220511.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/37328/1/13516-%d0%a2%d0%b5%d0%ba%d1%81%d1%82%20%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b0%d1%82%d1%8c%d0%b8-43920-1-10-20220511.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 639,63 kB