title: Etiquette of second remarks in social networks (illustrated with examples of social networking “Country of moms”)
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Shcheglova, Ekaterina A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-12-04T11:18:48Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-12-04T11:18:48Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Shcheglova, E. A. (2019). Etiquette of second remarks in social networks (illustrated with examples of social networking “Country of moms”). Media Linguistics, 6(2), 263–273.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2019.210
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16722
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The paper offers the author’s idea on social networks as a subject for research in the sphere
  of criticism of media speech, namely, from the point of view of compliance with the etiquette
  principles in the communication process. As a linguistic material, the social network for parents
  “country of moms” was chosen: it brings together women of reproductive age to discuss
  issues related to family and children. Discussion in social networks develops a dispute model,
  yet it has a spiral structure. This makes it particularly interesting to consider the second
  remarks of dialogues in terms of possibility or impossibility of turning them into remarksincentives,
  which is largely due to their compliance or non-compliance with the norms of
  network etiquette. In the study, such models of the second remarks as a remark of response,
  a remark of argument, a question, a blocker question, a blocker remark were defined. It was
  found that an important manifestation of second remarks’ etiquette is the principle of using
  citation in them. When the user is focused on the constructive continuation of the dialogue
  (in remarks-reponses and remarks-arguments), the citation is carried out by means of lexical
  formulas that are semantic dominants of the discussion and that allow the interlocutors
  to establish (or confirm) the subject of the dispute, their assessment and behavioral attitudes
  (motivation). When provoking a refusal to communicate or continue the discussion in a destructive
  way, this principle of etiquette is not observed: the user either shifts the semantic accents
  towards semantically less significant, but more advantageous ones from the perspective
  of the opponent’s speech disorientation elements (this is typical for the blockers — questions),
  or develops his/her own formulas, engaged in self-citation at each turn of the discussion (in
  remarks-blockers).
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Media Linguistics;Volume 6; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: etiquette
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: social networks
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the second remarks
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: dialogue
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: comment
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Etiquette of second remarks in social networks (illustrated with examples of social networking “Country of moms”)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 263-272.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16722/1/263-272.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 659,56 kB