title: КОГДА НАПИСАНА «ПОЭТИКА» АРИСТОТЕЛЯ?
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Позднев, Михаил Михайлович
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2015-06-10T11:53:34Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2015-06-10T11:53:34Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2014
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.issn
metadata.value: 0202-2532
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/1548
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description
metadata.value: Статья из выпуска 9 сборника "Philologia classica"
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: В статье сведены вместе аргументы в пользу поздней датировки «По-
  этики». Вопреки мнению части авторитетных исследователей (Дю-
  ринг, Буркерт) внешние свидетельства в комбинации с перекрестными
  ссылками императивно указывают на то, что Аристотель работал над
  «Поэтикой» в последний период своей жизни, живя в Афинах после
  334 г. Это не исключает, что наблюдения над закономерностями лите-
  ратурного творчества записывались им и ранее. Однако окончатель-
  ный вариант «Поэтики» (возможно, не законченный) создавался после
  «Политики» и до «Риторики». Доказательства ранней даты «Риторики»
  признаются недостаточными.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Philologia classica;9
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: древнегреческая философская проза, эстетика, Арис- тотель, Поэтика, Риторика
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Aristotle, Poetics, Rhetoric
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: КОГДА НАПИСАНА «ПОЭТИКА» АРИСТОТЕЛЯ?
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.altabstract
metadata.value: Th e chronology of the Aristotelian works fails to be supported by their proximity
  to or hostility towards Plato’s philosophy. In fact, only two means of
  maintaining the chronological order are reliable, i. e. the cross-references
  (provided they are authentic) and the historical data mentioned. Th e notorious
  question of diff erent chronological strata underlying Aristotelian treatises
  we try to put aside admitting that, although he may have worked lifelong
  on the similar topics, the remaining versions are most close to publishable.
  Th e fi nal author’s revision of a given work should thus be considered as
  its actual creation. Th e cross references necessarily bring to the conclusion
  that the Poetics was created aft er the Politics and before the Rhetoric: the
  famous catharsis reference in the Politics is in future tense (which also seems
  to prove its authenticity); all six Rhetoric references are retrospective; the
  Poetics reference in ch. XIX, 1456 a 33: 
   is either prospective or non-Aristotelian
  ( 1456 b 19, is defi nitely late and the other references to the Rhetoric
  elsewhere are missing; for additional evidence concerning relative chronology
  cf. Poet. 1454 b 17–18 and 1460 b 13–1). Th e absolute chronology
  151
  comfortably coincides with this: the Politics displays expectations pertaining
  to Alexan der’s reforms and conquests, and to prove that Rhetoric is late
  one only has to trace the dramatic political events of the early 30-ies hinted
  at. Th e Poetics is poor in external evidence of that kind. However, the high
  esteem of Th eodectes and the absence of recommendations regarding satyrs
  as well as trilogies point at the second Athenian period оf Aristotle. Th e
  philosopher could have derived inspiration from the impressive theatrical
  reform program of Lycurgus (reconstruction of the theatre of Dionysus, the
  edition of the three great tragedians). He may have even been involved in
  it and most certainly cherished hopes of reviving the art of tragedy which
  he saw in decline. Th e position of Düring, Burkert and others who argue
  that the Poetics and the Rhetoric (or their basic strata) were completed by
  Aristotle in the years of Academy should be abandoned. Th e early date of
  the Poetics tells nothing new about it, whereas the late date is not only better
  supported by the evidence, but also explains one of the most puzzling
  features of this treatise, that is, its prescriptive character.
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: Classical_philology.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/1548/1/Classical_philology.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 5,54 MB