title: “Palestinian Legacy” in Provisional Government’s Policy (March — April 1917)
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Shapovalov, M. S.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2017-08-20T16:38:06Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2017-08-20T16:38:06Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2017
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Shapovalov M. S. “Palestinian Legacy” in Provisional Government’s Policy (March — April 1917), Modern History of Russia, no. 2, 2017. P. 19–32.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/11701/spbu24.2017.202
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/7071
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article is based on documents published by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and unpublished
  archival materials from the collection of Minister of the Interim Government P. N. Milyukov. It examines the
  history of the Palestinian policy of the Provisional Government in March-April 1917. Particular attention is paid to
  the formation of the Palestinian heritage of the Interim Government, the history of the discussion of the future
  of Palestine during the First World War. The Russian Provisional Government of Prince G. E. Lvov inherited from
  tsarist Russia not only the difficult situation in the First World War, but also the obligations of Russia (and before
  Russia) about the arrangement of the postwar world. One of the key agreements complexes allies in the Entente
  in the 1914–1916 biennium was about the section of Asiatic Turkey. Government of G. E. Lvov was burdened by a
  range of issues in internal and foreign policy and had to formulate its position on the future shape of the Middle
  East, decide whether it will adhere to the agreement with Britain and France, or abandon them. The most important
  question remained postwar territorial acquisitions of Russia. In the context of the February revolution it
  was clear for the new ministers that just grab any area was now unlikely to be possible. In 1917 it was a peak of
  negotiations of allies on the support of Zionist aspirations in building (revival) their home (state) in the Holy Land,
  which again required the development of the position of the Interim Government. The article is a look at the Russian
  seemed to be well-researched negotiations on the partition of Asian Turkey on the base of foreign sources.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: Публикация подготовлена в рамках поддержанного РГНФ научного проекта №15-61-01007 «Палестина в системе международных отношений в конце XIX — начале XX в.: российский взгляд».
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Modern History of Russia;Issue 2(19)
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Palestine
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Provisional Government
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Sykes — Picot Agreement
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Balfour Declaration
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Miliukov
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: “Palestinian Legacy” in Provisional Government’s Policy (March — April 1917)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 02-Shapovalov.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/7071/1/02-Shapovalov.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 783,94 kB