title: Rereading Bayle
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Terenteva, Ekaterina A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-05-05T22:19:10Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-05-05T22:19:10Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Terenteva E. A. Rereading Bayle. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2020, vol. 65, iss. 1, pp. 329–338.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2020.120
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/17519
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In the first decades of the twenty-first century there has been a notable surge of scholarly
  interest in the problems of intellectual history, the issues of the Scientific Revolution in both
  Natural sciences and Humanities which still stay ahead of the curve. Such renowned researchers
  as P. Dear, S. Shapin, D. Wootton, and others are contributing to the study of changes in the
  minds of European intellectuals including their methods and their philosophical comprehension
  of the world. The monograph by Mara van der Lugt dedicated to the works of an eminent
  philosopher and writer of the early Enlightenment Pierre Bayle (1647–1706) is a major
  contribution to the vast Baylean studies which amount to hundreds of papers. The heritage
  of Bayle is put into political, religious, intellectual, and methodological contexts, including
  the complicated system of links and relations within the European Republic of Letters. The
  researcher suggests “a new way of reading Bayle”, which enables to raise and analyze a wide
  range of problems relating to Bayle’s “Historical and Critical Dictionary”. Another interesting
  methodological approach is the use of the figure of Bayle’s friend-antagonist Pierre Jurieu
  (1637–1713) as a sort of a semantic pivot, which simplifies the process of structuring and analyzing
  the enormous textual material. But, however solid and grounded the monograph is, it
  requires a number of critical comments given in the present review.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. History;Volume 65; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: intellectual history
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: history of science
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Bayle
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Jurieu
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Enlightenment
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Republic of Letters
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: philosophy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Rereading Bayle
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 329-338.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/17519/1/329-338.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 629,42 kB