title: World Trade Organization: Quo vadis?
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Sutyrin, Sergei F.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Xueling, Guan
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Jovanovic, Miroslav N.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Mashayekhi, Mina
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Paugam, Jean-Marie
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Portansky, Alexey P.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Smeets, Maarten
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-03-03T13:06:36Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-03-03T13:06:36Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Sutyrin S. F., Guan Xueling, Jovanovic M. N., Mashayekhi M., Paugam J.-M., Portansky A. P., Smeets M. (2020) World Trade Organization: Quo vadis? St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 36, iss. 4, pp. 543–578.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2020.401
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/25077
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: During last couple of years, the academic community, national civil servants in charge of trade
  policies, and employees of international economic organizations have intensively discussed
  reforming the World Trade Organization. All participants of the debate tend to agree that the
  system of multilateral trade regulation in its present form does not match expectations and
  requirements. There is less unanimity regarding the reasons that have resulted in the poor
  performance of the institution under review. As for possible ways to solve the problem, existing
  opinions differ dramatically. Both expert views and official proposals of WTO members
  (Canada, EU, Japan, China and some others) deal with prospects for the Doha round, modalities
  of future agreements, decision-making process, and a range of other questions waiting for
  uneasy answers.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The research was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Chinese Academy of
  Social Sciences (project No. 19-51-93009).
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies;Volume 36; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: international trade
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: World Trade Organization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: trade policy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: World Trade Organization: Quo vadis?
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 543-578.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/25077/1/543-578.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 832,13 kB