title: Grounds for the cancellation or amendment of court decisions in criminal cases on appeal
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Panokin, Aleksandr M.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-04-20T17:24:00Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-04-20T17:24:00Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Panokin, Aleksandr M. 2021. “Grounds for the cancellation or amendment of court decisions in criminal cases on appeal”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 1: 52–72.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.104
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/28062
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article analyzes the legal regulation and practice of applying the grounds of appeal. The
  positive and negative sides of the statutory recognition of the grounds of appeal are revealed.
  The author comes to the conclusion that when establishing such grounds in the Criminal
  Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, the rules of formal logic and systematization of
  legislation were violated. The grounds of appeal do not form a unified system, they do not
  cover all possible violations that entail the delivery of unjust court decisions. As a result of
  the study, it can be affirmed that the absence of appeal grounds will protect the rights of the
  individual in criminal proceedings to the maximum extent by maximizing the extension of
  the subject of the appeal and verification of court decisions, and it will provide ample opportunity
  for the court of appeal to identify and eliminate any violations committed. In addition
  to this, it is necessary to increase the requirements for the reasoning of appeals, representations
  of professional participants in criminal procedures and the quality of the justification
  and motivation of decisions by courts of appeal. The absence of the grounds of appeal makes
  it necessary to provide a detailed answer to the arguments of the subjects of the appeal set out
  in the complaints, as a result of which the decision of the court of appeal becomes not only
  legal, reasonable, motivated and fair, but also convincing. Equally, the absence of such grounds
  guarantees the independence of judges and their high professionalism, as well as the demand
  for creative potential when reviewing court decisions. In turn, the consolidation in the criminal
  procedure law of various grounds for reviewing court decisions that have entered into
  legal force will make it possible to limit separate control and verification stages of the criminal
  process from each other.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 12; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: grounds of appeal
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: subject of the appeal
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: subject of verification
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: court decisions
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: appeal
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: criminal process
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Grounds for the cancellation or amendment of court decisions in criminal cases on appeal
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 52-72.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/28062/1/52-72.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 691,41 kB