title: Civil law obligation reform in Russian Federation and its effect on the institute of damages (losses)
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Monastyrsky, Yuri E.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Koval’, Vladimir N.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Vlasov, Anatoliy A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-10-12T14:47:40Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-10-12T14:47:40Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Monastyrsky, Yuri E., Vladimir N. Koval’, Anatoliy A. Vlasov. 2021. “Civil law obligation reform in Russian Federation and its effect on the institute of damages (losses)”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 3: 574–583.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.306
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33302
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: When an economic actor resorts to recovery of damages as a legal remedy, the main question
  that arises is what legal provisions govern the claim raised by such an actor. At a first glance,
  the answer is simple: both Chapter 25 (“Liability for violation of obligations”) and Article
  15 (“Reimbursement of damages”) of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation contain
  provisions governing the terms of satisfaction of financial claims. However, such claims
  do not always arise from a failure to perform obligations and sometimes are even raised in
  the absence of an offence per se as stated by law. Therefore, quite often we need to consider
  the extent to which it would be lawful or, perhaps, even appropriate to invoke some of the
  provisions contained in Subsection 1 “General provisions on obligations” of Section III of
  the Civil Code. More detailed provisions on obligations introduced in March 2015 to Civil
  Code of RF may not be compatible with circumstances of losses. Articles 310, 311, 313, 314,
  328, 407, 416 if applicable to damages recovery claims would undermine the said remedy as
  such. They grand a debtor the legal basis assumed and adopted as his limited protection in
  obligatory relationship as a whole to avoid the burden of full reimbursement by suspension of
  performance, counter demands, etc.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 12; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: civil law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: liability
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: damages
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: loss
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: fault
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: harm
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: obligation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Civil law obligation reform in Russian Federation and its effect on the institute of damages (losses)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 574-583.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/33302/1/574-583.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 647,64 kB