title: Imagawa Ryoshun’s Nantaiheiki: Edited with Translation and Commentary. Part 1–2
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Prasol, Alexander F.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2024-09-27T13:37:09Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2024-09-27T13:37:09Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2024-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Prasol A. F. Imagawa Ryoshun’s Nantaiheiki: Edited with Translation and Commentary. Part 1–2. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, 2024, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 196– 218. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2024.112 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2024.112
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/47606
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article contains a description, typological characteristics, Russian translation and comments
  on the Nantaiheiki (Critisism of the Cronicle of Great Peace). Nantaiheiki was written
  in February 1402 by the Japanese politician and warlord Imagawa Ryoshun. Until now, it has
  not become an object of study in domestic oriental studies and has no Russian translation.
  The article analyzes the reasons for writing the manuscript and the goals pursued by its author.
  The translation of the text allows us to conclude that the Imagawa Ryoshun’s manuscript
  can be attributed to the medieval genre of family instructions for the military class (kakun,
  kaho), although it has some features that are not typical for them. Based on the translation,
  the author singles out three semantic parts in the manuscript: 1) information from the history
  of the Imagawa and Ashikaga families; 2) a description of the shortcomings of the Cronicle of
  Great Peace; 3) an explanation of the situation with Ryoshun’s participation in the rebellion
  of 1399–1400. A comparison of Imagawa’s comments with existing versions of the Taiheiki shows discrepancies in the description of details and allows us to assert that after his death
  the manuscript was repeatedly rewritten and supplemented. The article concludes that Nantaiheiki
  contains a reliable description of some fragments of the Imagawa family history and
  is of interest from the point of view of argumentation and moral assessments of the actions
  committed by the author himself and his contemporaries. However, it cannot be in any way
  considered as complete or reliable source representing the main events of the middle and
  second half of the 14th century.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies;Volume 16; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Nantaiheiki
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Imagawa Ryoshun
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Ashikaga Yoshimitsu
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Ouchi Yoshihiro
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Oei Disturbance
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Imagawa Ryoshun’s Nantaiheiki: Edited with Translation and Commentary. Part 1–2
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 12_Прасол+А.+Ф._196-218.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/47606/1/12_%d0%9f%d1%80%d0%b0%d1%81%d0%be%d0%bb%2b%d0%90.%2b%d0%a4._196-218.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 1,46 MB