title: Fundamentalism as problem of identity: Social psychological observations in theological perspective
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Plaul, Constantin
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2020-12-01T12:52:31Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2020-12-01T12:52:31Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2020-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Plaul C. Fundamentalism as problem of identity: Social psychological observations in theological perspective. Issues of Theology, 2020, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 441–456.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: http://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2020.304
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/21130
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article analyses the so-called religious and non-religious fundamentalism. From
  an empirical perspective, fundamentalism appears to be a constant phenomenon of
  modern life. The author claims that the principle possibility of fundamentalism has
  its roots in the sociocultural structures of Modernity. Of course, fundamentalist
  positions do not emerge necessarily, but they are inscribed in these structures as a
  permanent option. In the field of identity construction, the relation between fundamentalism and modern life can be explored especially well. This is because under
  modern conditions identity formation processes have not only found new opportunities, but also risky challenges. Herein lays a significant motive for fundamentalist
  identity constructions. To shed some light on this problematic complex, the author
  refers to insights of classical social psychology (Dilthey, Mead, Hofstätter, Goffman,
  Krappmann) and applies them to the problem here at stake. Because of the close
  nexus between fundamentalism and religion, religion plays an important role in
  the author’s argument. Reasoning from a protestant theological point of view, the
  author is not limited to a descriptive approach, but also offers a normative critique. Translation from German is made by Anna Briskina-Müller.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Issues of Theology;Volume 2; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: religion
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: theology
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: fundamentalism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Modernity
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: anti-modernism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: identity construction
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: social role
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: secularization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: social functional differentiation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Fundamentalism as problem of identity: Social psychological observations in theological perspective
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 441-456.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/21130/1/441-456.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 682,1 kB