title: Network, procedural and cognitive components of digital public governance implementation designs: Тhe experience of European countries
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Volkova, Anna V.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Kulakova, Tatyana A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2021-09-03T17:45:59Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2021-09-03T17:45:59Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-03
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Volkova A. V., Kulakova T. A. Network, procedural and cognitive components of digital public governance implementation designs: Тhe experience of European countries. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2021, vol. 37, issue 1, pp. 118–135.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/spbu17.2021.110
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/33040
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The authors of the article aimed to study institutional designs for implementing digital public
  governance in the context of the problem of state governance. It was revealed that digital designs
  act as ways to ensure the implementation of the rules laid down in the system. They are
  focused on the development of communication skills, on preventing or minimizing conflicts
  in public policy, but do not exclude the risks of developing dysfunctions and serious contradictions.
  The article presents the results of a comparative study of the digitalization policy of
  European leaders in this area, Estonia and Germany, where there is a tendency to “slow down”
  innovations: uneven implementation of digital technologies in business and public governance,
  a wary attitude of citizens, a stable number of political and cultural attitudes and a focus
  more on regulation rather than coordination in Internet management. Contradictions between
  the network, procedural and cognitive components of digital public governance implementation
  designs appear. The authors believe that the gap with practically implemented technologies
  increases due to the existence of organizational and institutional barriers that need to
  be overcome in various ways (process, cognitive, etc.). Organizational barriers can be removed
  directly by state managers, while institutional barriers are the subject of policy initiatives. The
  novelty of the study lies in the recognition of the mobilization effect of “coercive digitalization”.
  In the context of the pandemic, this mobilization was based on stable (stereotypical)
  interaction practices. According to the authors, as the forms of cooperation deepen, mutual
  long-term obligations become the main requirement and the state should create incentives for
  it. This is what prompts the demand for mutual responsibility of the digitalization “apostles”,
  users and the state.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.description.sponsorship
metadata.value: The research was conducted with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation, Project
  no. 19-18-00210 “Political ontology of digitalization: a study of the institutional basis of digital formats of
  state governability”.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: en
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 37; Issue 1
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: digitalization
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: institutional designs
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: public policy
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: civil participation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: conflicts
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: coordination
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: “smart regulation”
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: ethics
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: trust
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: “coercive digitalization”
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Network, procedural and cognitive components of digital public governance implementation designs: Тhe experience of European countries
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 118-135.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/33040/1/118-135.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 702,77 kB