title: Justice of punishment: Theoretical format and law enforcement practice
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Egorova, Tatyana I.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-02-09T13:47:02Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-02-09T13:47:02Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2021-12
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Egorova, Tatyana I. 2021. “Justice of punishment: Theoretical format and law enforcement practice”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 4: 984–1002.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.411
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/34790
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The article analyzes the theoretical and law enforcement aspects of justice as a principle of
  punishability, the purpose of criminal punishment and the general commencement of sentencing.
  The primary focus is the issues of appointment and execution of punishment in the form
  of imprisonment. The problems of exemption from serving a sentence due to illness, penalization
  of drug crimes and compensatory punishment as the most relevant and illustrative facts
  of the existing relationship of justice with the principles of legality and humanism are analyzed
  in particular. Based on the study of the exclusion of persons sentenced to imprisonment, the
  boundaries of the fairness of individual sanctions of criminal law norms were studied, and the
  fairness of their application was evaluated in connection with the possibilities of modern justice,
  including the presence of discrete powers of the court in terms of assigning a specific type
  of correctional institution. It is noted that the discursive analysis of legal studies and empirical
  data reflects two main directions for the implementation of justice of punishment in its effective
  appointment and execution: on the one hand, the correction of the convicted person in a
  safe penitentiary process should be provided, and on the other, there are deontic expectations
  of the victim, society and the state from the impact of necessary and sufficient measures for
  criminal coercion. Observation of the results of the author’s research, data from judicial practice
  and statistics does not allow us to draw a conclusion about the absolutization of the justice
  of punishment in the considered aspects. However, a promising focus of the penitentiary process
  is the increased individualization and differentiation of punishment based on the nature
  and degree of public danger of the crime, as well as the importance of private-public interests.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 12; Issue 4
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: justice
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: legality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: humanism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: principles of criminal law
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: punishment
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: imprisonment
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: regime
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Justice of punishment: Theoretical format and law enforcement practice
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 984-1002.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/34790/1/984-1002.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 723,8 kB