title: Contemporary studies on political communication — the limits of cognitive horizons
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Hordecki, Bartosz
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-01-28T12:53:20Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-01-28T12:53:20Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2018-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Hordecki, B. (2018). Contemporary studies on political communication — the limits of cognitive horizons. Media Linguistics, 5 (2), 210–220.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: 10.21638/spbu22.2018.205
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/15332
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: Principles governing contemporary metamorphosis of political communication influence its
  studies. Additionally, the main spheres of research interest in on political communication are
  determined in clear correspondence with these rules. Current studies in the area of political
  communication partly belong to political communication and to some extent are absorbed or
  infected by it. It results in confusion of views on media researcher’s obligations. In particular,
  voices emerge that he or she is obliged to deliver outcomes which can be easily mediatized or
  politicized (this is expected to ensure some alleged positive impact on transformation within
  the field of media and politics). In this context it is rather not surprising that contemporary
  research on political communication rarely starts from questioning which dimensions
  of human existence should/may be or should not/may not be mediatized or politicized.
  Moreover, representatives of studies on political communication not infrequently excessively
  ensure that they offer some kind of well-founded and reliable knowledge. However, the conclusions
  presented by them usually have to be asserted as nothing more than some functional
  idiosyncrasy.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Media Linguistics;Volume 5, no. 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: political communication
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: studies on political communication
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: cognitive horizon of studies on political communication
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: politicization and mediatization of studies on political communication
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Contemporary studies on political communication — the limits of cognitive horizons
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 05-Hordecki.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15332/1/05-Hordecki.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 627,07 kB