title: “TRACTS OF RUSSIAN MEMORY” OR THE MAIN “NESTS” OF MEMORY IN RUSSIA
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Nivat, Georges
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-05-06T11:52:11Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-05-06T11:52:11Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-04
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/9785288062353.02
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/36289
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: In this text, are given the plan and main contributions that are gathered in a collective
  work directed by Prof. Georges Nivat, Les sites de la mémoire russe. The first volume,
  Géographie de la mémoire russe, was published in 2007, the second one, Histoire et mythes
  de la mémoire russe, in 2019. The word “site” is meant as a prominent detail in the landscape
  and translated into Russian as “Uročišča”. The aim is to give a view of the main
  “sites” and debates that have arisen along Russian historiography since the 18th century.
  The “invention” of the “Chronicles” is one spectacular example. It goes from the first publication
  in 1846 to our days. Literature, painting, and music have constructed the Russian
  memory in the 18th century. Mussorgsky himself researched in the archives who were the Old believers, before writing his opera “Khovanshchina”. Ethnography appeared in
  the first half of the 19th century, the came great museums at the two extremities of
  the Empire, and a great number of ethnographical local museums are innumerable in
  Russia, have saved a lot of artefacts during the Soviet vandalistic period. Folklore was
  studied and local troubadours were registered until the end of the Soviet era. Emperor
  Peter the Great was keenly aware of the importance of creating his own myth during his
  lifetime, and succeeded, his role is still the main debate of Russian historiography and a
  very prominent site of memory. Loss of memory began early in the Soviet regime, loss
  of proletarian memory and as well as of peasant memory. Refs 9.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: St. Petersburg University Studies in Social Sciences & Humanities Vol. 2 Proceedings of 49th International Philological Conference in Memory of Professor Ludmila Verbitskaya (1936–2019);Volume 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: memory
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: places of memory
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Russian culture
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: sites of Russian memory
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: “TRACTS OF RUSSIAN MEMORY” OR THE MAIN “NESTS” OF MEMORY IN RUSSIA
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Book chapter
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 27-40.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/36289/1/27-40.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 730,88 kB