title: Cross-textual and intertextual connections as manifestation of dialogue between texts
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Grishaeva, Liudmila Ivanovna
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-12-09T12:29:40Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-12-09T12:29:40Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-06
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Grishaeva L. I. Cross-textual and intertextual connections as manifestation of dialogue between texts. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2019, 16 (2): 172–187.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2019.202
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16764
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: The paper discusses dialogue between texts. This metaphor nominates heterogeneous phenomena
  which differ in nature, functional potential and properties and which can be defined
  by a variety of their characteristics. The dialogue between texts can be described from various
  perspectives: thematic, nominative, cognitive, functional, or intentional. The same applies to
  markers of textual dialogue. The markers can be characterized from cognitive, interactional,
  verbal (including structural), and grammatical points of view. The paper discusses consequences
  of dialogue between texts within a culture. Two examples of textual dialogues are:
  hypertextual organization of modern computer-mediated communication; and new textual
  entities that exist in mass media discourse and denote one and the same media event in one
  or several cultures. The author differentiates cross-textual and intertextual relations: the former
  are interpreted as a wider concept in comparison to the latter. The paper lists criteria according
  to which various groups and subgroups of textual relations are identified. The author
  creates a typology of intra-textual, cross-textual and intertextual relations, which takes into
  account both content-related and formal parameters that are further differentiated according
  to the environment in which a particular kind of textual relations exists. The paper describes
  cognitive fundamentals for the recognition of the dialogue between texts and discusses reasons
  for spreading dialogue between texts.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Language and Literature;Volume 16; Issue 2
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: text
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: textuality
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: means of coherence
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: typology of connections
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: functions of connections
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: Cross-textual and intertextual connections as manifestation of dialogue between texts
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 172-187.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16764/1/172-187.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 701,27 kB