title: International cooperation in the fight against cyberpression in the context of response to new challenges and threats
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Klevtsov, Kirill K.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2022-12-29T14:17:05Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2022-12-29T14:17:05Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2022-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Klevtsov, Kirill K. 2022. “International cooperation in the fight against cyberpression in the context of response to new challenges and threats”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 3: 678–695. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.306 (In Russian)
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.306
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/38771
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: This article explores criminal procedure and other organizational and legal aspects of international
  cooperation between states in the fight against cybercrime in the face of new challenges
  and threats. The aim is to identify and consider formal and informal measures of international
  cooperation in response to transnational cybercrime. Through legal analysis, we demonstrate
  that such crimes, as a rule, have an international character, as they have negative consequences
  on the territory of other sovereign countries. The author analyzes various forms of international
  cooperation in the fight against crime, which include extradition (extradition), legal assistance
  in criminal matters, transfer of criminal prosecution (judicial proceedings), as well as
  informal cooperation between law enforcement agencies (international police cooperation),
  in particular within the framework of US law called “СLOUD Act”. As an empirical basis for
  the study, materials of Russian operational and investigative practice for 2018–2019, as well
  as decisions of courts of foreign states, were used. However, the majority of law enforcement
  agencies deliberately or without intent resort to the practice of obtaining evidence on cybercrimes
  that are physically located on the territory of another country, independently, without
  obtaining the consent of this state. This happens through a remote connection in real time
  to the subscriber device of a criminally prosecuted person or its withdrawal from a victim or
  witness located on the territory of the state by law enforcement agencies that conduct proceedings
  on a cybercrime case with subsequent inspection to find information relevant to the case,
  as well as through the use of other legal methods.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Law;Volume 13; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: cybercrime
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: international cooperation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: jurisdiction
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: electronic information
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: service provider
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: International cooperation in the fight against cyberpression in the context of response to new challenges and threats
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 06.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/38771/1/06.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 738,55 kB