title: The Reformation as a call to discussion
metadata.name: dc.contributor.author
metadata.value: Butakov, Pavel A.
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.accessioned
metadata.value: 2019-11-14T13:11:13Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.available
metadata.value: 2019-11-14T13:11:13Z
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.date.issued
metadata.value: 2019-09
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.citation
metadata.value: Butakov P. A. The Reformation as a call to discussion. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2019, vol. 35, issue 3, pp. 519–527.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.identifier.other
metadata.value: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.311
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.identifier.uri
metadata.value: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/16588
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.description.abstract
metadata.value: There are numerous interpretations of the event that is considered the beginning of the European
  Reformation of the 16th century, i. e., the publication of the Ninety-Five Theses by Martin
  Luther in 1517. According to the most popular interpretations, the publication of the Theses
  was an extraordinary historical event. I argue, however, that the writing of the Theses was an
  ordinary episode of daily academic life. This claim is justified by excerpts from private letters
  of Martin Luther from 1517–1518, contemporary historical scholarship of the Reformation
  era, and analysis of the specific features of European academic life and events from the history
  of the Church in the 15th–16th centuries. I consider the creation of the Ninety-Five Theses as a
  part of the more-than-a-century-old academic competition between universities belonging to
  the traditions of via antiqua and via moderna. In addition, I establish a relationship between,
  on the one hand, the struggle of the philosophical and theological traditions of via moderna
  and via antiqua and, on the other hand, the struggle of the ecclesiastical political movements
  for conciliarism and for the primacy of the pope. I also claim that the true cause of the beginning
  of the Reformation lies in the conflict between the ecclesiastical authorities, who tried
  to suppress theological discussions, and the academic community, which considered those
  discussions their undeniable right.
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.language.iso
metadata.value: ru
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.publisher
metadata.value: St Petersburg State University
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.relation.ispartofseries
metadata.value: Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies;Volume 35; Issue 3
metadata.lang: -
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Reformation
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Martin Luther
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Ninety-Five Theses
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: conciliarism
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: via moderna
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: Council of Constance
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.subject
metadata.value: the Fifth Lateran Council
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.title
metadata.value: The Reformation as a call to discussion
metadata.lang: en_GB
metadata.name: dc.type
metadata.value: Article
metadata.lang: en_GB
resources.filename: 519-527.pdf
resources.url: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16588/1/519-527.pdf
resources.format: Adobe PDF
resources.size: 614,69 kB